<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://ideawaza.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=121.243.170.233</id>
	<title>IdeaWazaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://ideawaza.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=121.243.170.233"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/121.243.170.233"/>
	<updated>2026-09-29T03:41:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Project_fork&amp;diff=25763</id>
		<title>Archive:Project fork</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Project_fork&amp;diff=25763"/>
		<updated>2009-02-12T05:50:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;121.243.170.233: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[software engineering]], a &#039;&#039;&#039;project fork&#039;&#039;&#039;  happens when developers take a copy of [[source code]] from one [[Computer software|software package]] and start independent development on it, creating a distinct piece of software.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[free software|Free]] or [[open source]] software is that which may be forked from the original development team. However, licensed forks of proprietary software (&#039;&#039;e.g.&#039;&#039; [[Unix]]) also happen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Branching ==&lt;br /&gt;
A kind of fork that is standard practice in many projects is a &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;stable&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;release&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039; version, modified only for bug fixes, while a &#039;&#039;development&#039;&#039; tree develops new features. Such forks are usually referred to as &amp;quot;[[branching (software)|branches]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Free software==&lt;br /&gt;
Free or open source software may be forked with no prior permission, per the definitions of &amp;quot;[[free software]]&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;) and &amp;quot;[[Open Source Definition|open source]]&amp;quot; (&#039;&#039;&amp;quot;3. Derived Works: redistribution of modifications must be allowed. (To allow legal sharing and to permit new features or repairs.)&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In free software, forks often result from a [[schism]] over different goals or personality clashes. In a fork, both parties assume nearly identical code bases but typically only the larger group, or whoever controls the web site, will retain the full original name and the associated user community. Thus there is a reputation penalty associated with forking. The relationship between the different teams can be cordial (&#039;&#039;e.g.&#039;&#039;, [[Ubuntu]] and [[Debian]]) or very bitter ([[X.Org Server]] and [[XFree86]], or [[cdrtools]] and [[cdrkit]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forks are considered an expression of the freedom made available by free software, but a weakness since they duplicate development efforts and can confuse users over which forked package to use. Developers have the option to collaborate and pool resources with free software, but it is not ensured by [[free software licenses]], only by a commitment to cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;[[The Cathedral and the Bazaar]]&#039;&#039; stated in 1997 [http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/homesteading/ar01s03.html] that &#039;&#039;&amp;quot;The most important characteristic of a fork is that it spawns competing projects that cannot later exchange code, splitting the potential developer community&amp;quot;&#039;&#039;. However, this is not common present usage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, a fork can merge back into the original project or replace it. [[EGCS]] (the Experimental/Enhanced GNU Compiler System) was a fork from [[GNU Compiler Collection|GCC]] which proved more vital than the original project and was eventually &amp;quot;blessed&amp;quot; as the official GCC project. Some have attempted to invoke this effect deliberately, &#039;&#039;e.g.&#039;&#039;, [[Mozilla Firefox]] started as an unofficial project within [[Mozilla]] that soon replaced the [[Mozilla Suite]] as the focus of development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the matter of forking, the [[Jargon File]] says:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Forking is considered a [[Bad Thing]]&amp;amp;mdash;not merely because it implies a lot of wasted effort in the future, but because forks tend to be accompanied by a great deal of strife and acrimony between the successor groups over issues of legitimacy, succession, and design direction. There is serious social pressure against forking. As a result, major forks (such as the [[GNU Emacs|Gnu-Emacs]]/[[XEmacs]] split, the fissioning of the [[386BSD]] group into three daughter projects, and the short-lived GCC/EGCS split) are rare enough that they are remembered individually in hacker folklore.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is easy to declare a fork, but can require considerable effort to continue independent development and support. As such, forks without adequate resources can soon become inactive, &#039;&#039;e.g.&#039;&#039;, GoneME, a fork of [[GNOME]] by a former developer, which was soon discontinued despite attracting some publicity. Some well-known forks have enjoyed great success, however, such as the [[X.Org Server|X.Org]] [[X Window System|X11]] server, a fork from [[XFree86]] which gained widespread support from developers and users and notably sped up X development.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proprietary software==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[proprietary software]], the copyright is usually held by the employing entity, not by the individual software developers.  Proprietary code is thus more commonly forked when the owner needs to develop two or more versions, such as a [[Window (computing)|windowed]] version and a [[command line interface|command line]] version, or versions for differing operating systems, such as a [[wordprocessor]] for [[IBM PC]] compatible machines and [[Apple Macintosh|Macintosh]] computers. Generally, such internal forks will concentrate on having the same look, feel, data format, and behavior between platforms so that a user familiar with one can also be productive or share documents generated on the other. This is almost always an economic decision to generate a greater [[market share]] and thus pay back the associated extra development costs created by the fork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A notable proprietary fork not of this kind is the many varieties of proprietary [[Unix]] &amp;amp;mdash; all derived from AT&amp;amp;T Unix and all called &amp;quot;Unix&amp;quot;, but increasingly mutually incompatible.&amp;lt;!-- see the see-also for the reference for this --&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;See&#039;&#039; [[UNIX wars]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[BSD licenses]] permit forks to become proprietary software, and some say that commercial incentives thus make proprietisation almost inevitable. Examples include [[Mac OS X]] (based on [[Nextstep]] and thus [[BSD]]), [[Cedega]] and [[CrossOver]] (proprietary forks of [[Wine (software)|Wine]]),&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.enterprisedb.com EnterpriseDB] (a fork of [[PostgreSQL]], adding Oracle compatibility features), [http://www.fastware.com.au/docs/FujitsuSupportedPostreSQLWhitePaperV1_02.pdf Fujitsu Supported PostgreSQL] &lt;br /&gt;
with their proprietary ESM storage system, and [http://www.netezza.com/media/2004/Weblog.htm Netezza]&#039;s proprietary highly scalable derivative of PostgreSQL. Some of these vendors contribute back changes to the community project, while some keep their changes as their own competitive advantages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other notable forks==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Most [[Linux distribution]]s are descended from other distributions, most being traceable back to [[Debian]], [[Red Hat Linux|Red Hat]] or [[Slackware]]. Since most of the content of a distribution is free software, ideas and software interchange freely as is useful to the individual distribution. Merges (&#039;&#039;e.g.&#039;&#039;, [[United Linux]] or [[Mandriva]]) are rare.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pretty Good Privacy]] was forked outside of the United States&amp;lt;!-- see that article for ref--&amp;gt; to free it from restrictive US laws on the [[export of cryptography|exportation of cryptographic software]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The game &#039;&#039;[[NetHack]]&#039;&#039; has spawned a number of variants using the original code, notably &#039;&#039;[[Slash&#039;EM]]&#039;&#039;, and was itself a fork of &#039;&#039;[[Hack (video game)|Hack]]&#039;&#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[OpenBSD]] was a fork of [[NetBSD]] 1.0 by [[Theo de Raadt]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[OpenSSH]] was a fork from [[Secure Shell|SSH]], which happened because the license for SSH 2.x was [[non-free]] (even though the source was available), so an older version of SSH 1.x, the last to have been licensed as [[free software]], was forked. Within months, virtually all Linux distributions, BSD versions and even some proprietary Unixes had replaced SSH with OpenSSH.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DragonFly BSD]] was forked from [[FreeBSD]] 4.8 by long-time FreeBSD developer [[Matt Dillon (computer scientist)|Matt Dillon]], due to disagreement over FreeBSD 5&#039;s technical direction.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adempiere]] is a community maintained fork of [[Compiere]] 2.5.3b, due to disagreement with commercial and technical direction of Compiere Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NeoOffice]] is a fork of [[OpenOffice.org]], with an incompatible license (GPL rather than LGPL), due to disagreements about licensing and about the best method to [[porting|port]] OpenOffice.org to [[Mac OS X]].&lt;br /&gt;
*MiaCMS (and Lite) is a fork of Mambo (and Lite). As well as Joomla! 1.0.xx is a fork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Licensing_and_Law/forking.html Fear of forking] - An essay about forking in [[free software]] projects, by Rick Moen&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html#forking Forking] ([[David A. Wheeler]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.usemod.com/cgi-bin/mb.pl?RightToFork Right to Fork] at [[Meatball Wiki]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Software development]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Software forks| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[ca:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[cs:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Abspaltung (Softwareentwicklung)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[es:Bifurcación (desarrollo de software)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[it:Fork (sviluppo software)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[nl:Fork (ontwikkeling)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[ja:フォーク (ソフトウェア開発)]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[pl:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[pt:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[ru:Форк]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[sk:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[sv:Fork]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>121.243.170.233</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>