<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://ideawaza.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=129.67.0.0%2F16</id>
	<title>IdeaWazaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://ideawaza.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=129.67.0.0%2F16"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/129.67.0.0/16"/>
	<updated>2026-09-30T04:01:20Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Principles_of_Management&amp;diff=21238</id>
		<title>Principles of Management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Principles_of_Management&amp;diff=21238"/>
		<updated>2008-11-18T11:54:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.49.210: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Principles of Management are the essential, underlying factors that form the foundations of successful management. According to [[w:Henri Fayol|Henri Fayol]] (1841-1925) in his book &#039;&#039;General and Industrial Management&#039;&#039; (1916), there are fourteen &#039;principles of management&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Principles ==&lt;br /&gt;
Management principles are statements of fundamental truth. These principles serve as guidelines for decisions and actions of managers. &lt;br /&gt;
They are derived through observation and analysis of events which managers have to face in practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;&#039;Division of Work -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The specialization of the workforce, creating specific personal and professional development within the labour force and therefore increasing productivity; leads to specialization which increases the efficiency of labour. By separating a small part of work, the workers speed and accuracy in its performance increases. This principle is applicable to both technical as well as managerial work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;&#039;Authority and Responsibility-&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issue of commands followed by responsibility for their consequences. Authority means the right of a superior to give order to his subordinates; responsibility means obligation for performance.&lt;br /&gt;
This principle suggests that there must be parity between authority and responsibilty.. They are co-existent and go together, and are two sides of the same coin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &#039;&#039;&#039;Discipline-&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discipline refers to obedience, proper conduct in relation to others, respect of authority, etc. It is essential for the smooth functioning of all organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &#039;&#039;&#039;Unity of Command -&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This principle states that every subordinate should receive orders and be accountable to one and only one superior. If an employee receives orders from more than one superior, it is likely to create confusion and conflict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unity of Command also makes it easier to fix responsibility for mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &#039;&#039;&#039;Unity of Direction -&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All those working in the same line of activity must understand and pursue the same objectives. All related activities should be put under one group, there should be one plan of action for them, and they should be under the control of one manager.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seeks to ensure unity of action, focusing of efforts and coordination of strength. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &#039;&#039;&#039;Subordination of Individual Interest&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The management must put aside personal considerations and put company objectives first. Therefore the interests of goals of the organization must prevail over the personal interests of individuals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. &#039;&#039;&#039;Remuneration -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Workers must be paid sufficiently as this is a chief motivation of employees and therefore greatly influences productivity. The quantum and methods of remuneration payable should be fair, reasonable and rewarding of effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. &#039;&#039;&#039;The Degree of Centralization -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of power wielded with the central management depends on company size. Centralization implies the concentration of decision making authority at the top management. Sharing of authority with lower levels is called decentralization. The organization should strive to achieve a proper balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. &#039;&#039;&#039;Scalar Chain -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Scalar Chain refers to the chain of superiors ranging from top management to the lowest rank. The principle suggests that there should be a clear line of authority from top to bottom linking all managers at all levels. It is considered a chain of command.&lt;br /&gt;
It involves a concept called a &amp;quot;gang plank&amp;quot; using which a subordinate may contact a superior or his superior in case of an emergency,defying the hierarchy of control.However the imediate superiors must be informed about the matter &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. &#039;&#039;&#039;Order -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Social order ensures the fluid operation of a company through authoritative procedure.  Material order ensures safety and efficiency in the workplace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. &#039;&#039;&#039;Equity -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employees must be treated kindly, and justice must be enacted to ensure a just workplace. Managers should be fair and impartial when dealing with employees.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. &#039;&#039;&#039;Stability of Tenure of Personnel -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period of service should not be too short and employees should not be moved from positions frequently. An employee cannot render useful service if he is removed before he becomes accustomed to the work assigned to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. &#039;&#039;&#039;Initiative -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the initiative of employees can add strength and new ideas to an organization. Initiative on the part of employees is a source of strength for the organization because it provides new and better ideas. Employees are likely to take greater interest in the functioning of the organization. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. &#039;&#039;&#039;Esprit de Corps -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This refers to the need of managers to ensure and develop morale in the workplace; individually and communally. Team spirit helps develop an atmosphere of mutual trust and understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These can be used to initiate and aid the processes of change, organization, decision making, skill management and the overall view of the management function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fayol also divided the management function into five key roles:&lt;br /&gt;
*To organise&lt;br /&gt;
*To plan and forecast (Prevoyance)&lt;br /&gt;
*To command&lt;br /&gt;
*To control&lt;br /&gt;
*To coordinate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further Reading - ==&lt;br /&gt;
*Administration Industrielle et Général, Henri Fayol, 1917&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources - ==&lt;br /&gt;
#http://www.12manage.com/methods_fayol_14_principles_of_management.html&lt;br /&gt;
#Administration Industrielle et Général, Henri Fayol, 1917&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Participants in this [[learning resource]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:RobbiG]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[School:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Master of Business Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Business research]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Start-Up Business Financing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:International Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Management]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Principles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.49.210</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Medicine&amp;diff=1321</id>
		<title>Medicine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Medicine&amp;diff=1321"/>
		<updated>2006-09-06T14:24:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.13.54: /* Division of Neurosciences */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Welcome to the School of Medicine!&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Physcian examining a child.jpg|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Medicine|Medicine]]&#039;&#039;&#039; is the branch of [[w:health science|health science]] and the sector of public life concerned with maintaining or restoring [[w:human|human]] [[w:health|health]] through the study, diagnosis and treatment of [[w:disease|disease]] and [[w:injury|injury]]. It is both an &#039;&#039;area of knowledge&#039;&#039; &amp;amp;ndash; a [[w:science|science]] of [[w:body|body]] [[w:organ system|systems]], their diseases and treatment &amp;amp;ndash; and the &#039;&#039;applied practice&#039;&#039; of that knowledge. However, &#039;&#039;medicine&#039;&#039; often refers more specifically to matters dealt with by [[w:physician|physicians]] and [[w:surgery|surgeons]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medicine is both an area of knowledge (a &#039;&#039;science&#039;&#039;), and the application of that knowledge (by the medical profession and other health professionals such as nurses). The various specialized branches of the science of medicine correspond to the equally specialized medical professions dealing with particular organs or diseases. The science of medicine is the knowledge of body systems and diseases, while the [[w:profession|profession]] of medicine refers to the social structure of the group of people formally trained to apply that knowledge to treat disease.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Medicine comprises various specialized sub-branches, such as [[w:cardiology|cardiology]], [[w:pulmonology|pulmonology]], [[w:neurology|neurology]], or other fields such as sports medicine, research or public health.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;[[w:Medicine|More...]]&#039;&#039;&#039;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Divisions and Departments==&lt;br /&gt;
Divisions and Departments of the School exist on pages in &amp;quot;topic&amp;quot; namespace. Start the name of departments with the &amp;quot;Topic:&amp;quot; prefix; departments reside in the [[Wikiversity:Namespaces|Topic: namespace]]. Departments and divisions link to learning materials and learning projects. Divisions can link subdivisions or to departments. For more information on schools, divisions and departments look at the [[Wikiversity:Naming_conventions|Naming Conventions]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Topic:Basic sciences|Basic sciences]]===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Chemistry|Chemistry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Physics|Physics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Molecular biology|Molecular biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Cell Biology|Cell biology]] - Ready for participants.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Human Body]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Anatomy|Anatomy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[School:Psychology|Psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Communication|Communication]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[School:Law|Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Philosophy|Philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Division of Biology|General Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Histology|Histology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Medical Microbiology|Medical Microbiology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Pathology|Pathology]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Physiology|Physiology]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Immunology|Immunology]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Laboratory Techniques|Laboratory Techniques]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Genetics|Genetics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Medical Specializations / Divisions and Departments===&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of Surgery and Anesthesiology===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Surgery|Surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:General surgery|General surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Cardiothoracic surgery|Cardiothoracic surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Neurosurgery|Neurosurgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Ophthalmology|Ophthalmology]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Orthopedic surgery|Orthopedic surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Plastic surgery|Plastic surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Pediatric surgery|Pediatric surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Urology|Urology]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Topic:Vascular surgery|Vascular surgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Anesthesiology|Anesthesiology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Emergency Medicine|Emergency Medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Intensive care medicine|Intensive care medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of General and Internal Medicine===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Internal medicine|Internal medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Cardiology|Cardiology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Endocrinology|Endocrinology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Gastroenterology|Gastroenterology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Hematology|Hematology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Infectious diseases|Infectious diseases]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Nephrology|Nephrology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Oncology|Oncology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Pulmonology|Pulmonology]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Topic:Rheumatology|Rheumatology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Dermatology|Dermatology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Otorhinolaryngology|Otorhinolaryngology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of Healthcare and General Practice===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:General practice|General practice]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Public Health &amp;amp; Occupational Medicine|Public Health &amp;amp; Occupational Medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of Woman, Child and Geriatric Health===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology|Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Pediatrics|Pediatrics]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Geriatrics|Geriatrics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of Neurosciences=== &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Psychiatry|Psychiatry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Neurology|Neurology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Neurosurgery|Neurosurgery]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Neuroscience|Neuroscience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Psychology|Psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Sciences===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Radiology|Radiology]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Radiation Oncology|Radiation Oncology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Division of Experimental Medicine===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Topic:Biomedical Informatics|Biomedical Informatics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Active participants==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[User:Stevenfruitsmaak|Steven Fruitsmaak]] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User_talk:Stevenfruitsmaak|Talk]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 00:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[User:Daniel575|Daniel575]] 15:34, 5 September 2006 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==School news==&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;August 24, 2006&#039;&#039;&#039; - School founded! Also most elements transferred from WikiBooks. Let the learning begin!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[School:Biology|The School of Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikiversity schools|Medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Fachbereich_Humanmedizin]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.13.54</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Solid_state_physics&amp;diff=17137</id>
		<title>Archive:Solid state physics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Solid_state_physics&amp;diff=17137"/>
		<updated>2006-06-10T03:06:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.40.218: correct grammatical mistakes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Solid State Physics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Topics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What is a solid?&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Cristaline Solids&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Vitreous Solids&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Other Amorphous Solids&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Binding Forces in a Solid&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Cristaline Structure and Symmetries&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Bravais Lattice&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Reciprocal Lattice&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Bragg Diffraction&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Bloch&#039;s Theorem&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lattice Vibrations&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Phonons&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Electronic Conduction in Solids&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Drude Theory of Conduction&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Sommerfeld Theory of Conduction&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Boltzmann&#039;s Equation&lt;br /&gt;
    ** Quantum Transport&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.40.218</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4845</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4845"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T22:42:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We must note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]]. Consequently, it is possible to introduce a [[dimensionless number|dimensionless correction factor]], Y, in order to characterise the geometry. We thus have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = Y \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.4)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where Y is a function of the the crack length and width of sheet given by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Y \left ( \frac{a}{W} \right ) = \sqrt{\sec\left ( \frac{\pi a}{W} \right )}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for a sheet of finite width W containing a through-thickness crack of length 2a, or&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Y \left ( \frac{a}{W} \right ) = 1.12 - \frac{0.41}{\sqrt \pi} \frac{a}{W} + \frac{18.7}{\sqrt \pi} \left ( \frac{a}{W} \right )^2 - ...\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.6)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for a sheet of finite width W containing a through-thickness edge crack of length a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remainder of the mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering - Mathematical Relations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4844</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4844"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T22:31:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We must note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]]. Consequently, it is possible to introduce a [[dimensionless number|dimensionless correction factor]], Y, in order to characterise the geometry. We thus have:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = Y \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.4)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where Y is given by:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;Y(a/W)  = \sqrt{sec(\pi a / W )}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for a sheet of finite width W containing a through-thickness crack of length 2a&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remainder of the mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering - Mathematical Relations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4843</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4843"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T22:20:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remainder of the mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering - Mathematical Relations]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4842</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4842"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T22:19:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remainder of the mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering - Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4841</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4841"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T22:18:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4840</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4840"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T22:17:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
*C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4839</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4839"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:56:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4838</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4838"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:55:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [[Charpy Impact Test]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4837</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4837"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:55:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm UMIST - Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4836</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4836"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:50:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterise fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useful Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4835</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4835"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:49:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useul Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4834</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4834"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:49:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The mathematics employed in this approach is interesting, but is probably better summarised in external pages due to its complex nature (refer to the Useful Websites section).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useul Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm eFunda - Fracuture Mechanics]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4833</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4833"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:42:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The complex mathematics employed in this approach is  summarized on the [http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering Web Page]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Useul Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.efunda.com/formulae/solid_mechanics/fracture_mechanics/fm_intro.cfm www.efunda.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4832</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4832"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:39:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The complex mathematics employed in this approach is  summarized on the [http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering Web Page]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_{Ic} = \sqrt{\frac{E J_{Ic}}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4831</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4831"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:36:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Theory ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The complex mathematics employed in this approach is  summarized on the [http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering Web Page]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_Ic = \sqrt{\frac{E J_Ic}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4830</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4830"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T21:35:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (3.1) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2.3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (2.1) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The complex mathematics employed in this approach is  summarized on the [http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering Web Page]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_Ic = \sqrt{\frac{E J_Ic}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3.1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4829</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4829"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T20:17:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The History of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (6) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appendix: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(4)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (3) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The complex mathematics employed in this approach is  summarized on the [http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering Web Page]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; = {EJ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/(1 - ν&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;              (6)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, Lecture Notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4828</id>
		<title>About fracture mechanics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=About_fracture_mechanics&amp;diff=4828"/>
		<updated>2006-02-10T20:06:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;129.67.62.226: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is a method for predicting failure of a structure containing a crack. It uses methods of analytical [[Solid Mechanics]] to calculate the driving force on a crack and those of experimental [[Solid Mechanics]] to characterize the material&#039;s resistance to fracture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern [[Materials Science]], &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is an important tool in improving the mechanical performance of materials and components. It applies the [[physics]] of [[stress (physics)|stress]] and [[strain]], in particular the theories of [[elasticity]] and [[plasticity (physics)|plasticity]], to the microscopic [[crystallographic defect]]s found in real materials in order to predict the macroscopic mechanical failure of bodies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An excellent introduction to &#039;&#039;&#039;Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&#039; is: Adrian Demaid &#039;&#039;Fail Safe&#039;&#039; Open University (2004).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Need for Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tay1.jpg|left|thumb|Tay Bridge Disaster (1879)]]In many cases, failure of engineering structures through fracture can be fatal; one example is that of the [http://www.mcgonagall-online.org.uk/poems/pgdisaster.htm Tay Bridge Disaster] (left). Often disasters occur because engineering structures contain cracks - arising either during production or during serevice (e.g. from [[Fatigue (material)|fatigue]]). These cracks can lower the strength of the structure beyond that due to loss of load-bearing area.  For instance, growth of cracks in pressure vessels due to crack propagation could cause an fatal explosion. If failure were ever to happen, we would rather it were by [[yield (engineering)|yield]] or by leak before break. As a consequence, a material property, above and beyond conventional strength, is needed to describe the fracture resistance of engineering materials. This is the reason for the need for fracture mechanics - the evaluation of the strength of cracked structures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Griffith&#039;s Crack Theory: Strain Energy Release Rate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fracture Mechanics was invented during World War I by English aeronautical engineer, [[A.A.Griffith]], to explain the failure of brittle materials. Griffith was faced with the problem that theoretical calculations showed that the stress at the tip of a sharp crack approaches infinity. Accordingly, any structure containing a crack should fail, no matter how small the crack or how light the load. To solve this dilemma, Griffith developed a thermodynamic approach. He assumed that growth of a crack requires creation of surface energy, which is supplied by the loss of strain energy accompanying the relaxation of local stresses as the crack advances. Failure occurs when the loss of strain energy is sufficient to provide the increase in surface energy, as shown in the Appendix to this article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Irwin&#039;s Modified Griffith Crack Theory: Fracture Toughness, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TankerSchenectady.jpg|left|thumb|The S.S.Schenectady Split Apart by Brittle Fracture while in Harbor (1944)]]Griffith’s work was ignored for over twenty years until a group under [[G.R. Irwin]] at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) took it up during World War II. Irwin and his colleagues developed a modified form of Griffith&#039;s approach; they reformulated it in terms of stress, rather than energy. Their work resulted in a new materials property, [[fracture toughness]], which is denoted K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, and is now universally accepted as the defining property of fracture mechanics (see Appendix for equations).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But a problem arose for the NRL researchers because naval materials, e.g. ship-plate steel, are not perfectly elastic but undergo [[plastic deformation]] at the tip of a crack violating the underlyuing assumption of the theory. Linear-elastic fracture mechanics is limitied practical use for structural steels for two other reasons:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(1) Fracture toughness testing is very expensive and sufficient information for selection of steels can be obtained from the simpler and cheaper [http://www2.umist.ac.uk/material/research/intmic/features/charpy/notes.htm Charpy Impact Test]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) If a part&#039;s reasponse to load is sufficiently close to linear-elastic that K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; can be measured, there is little plastic relaxation at the crack tip and the steel will be [[brittle]]. Structural steels, in particular, can be prone to brittle fracture, which has led to a number of catastrophic failures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aircraft_Crash.jpg|left|thumb|Vertical Stabilizer, which Separated from the Aircraft Leading to a Fatal Crash(2001)]]In the mid-1960&#039;s  J.R.Rice (then at Brown University) developed a new toughness measure to describe the case where there is sufficient crack-tip deformation that the part no longer obeys the linear-elastic approximation. Rice&#039;s analysis, which assumes non-linear elastic deformation ahead of the crack tip, is designated the J integral. This analysis is limited to situations where plastic deformation at the crack tip does no extend to the furthest edge of the loaded part. It also demands that the assumed non-linear elastic behavior of the material is a reasonable approximation in shape and magnitude to the real material&#039;s load response. The elastic-plastic failure parameter is designated J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is conventionally converted to K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; using Equation (6) of the Appendix to this article. Also note that the J integral approach reduces to the Griffith theory for linear-elastic behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fully Plastic Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the alloy is so tough that the yielded region ahead of the crack extends to the far edge of the specimen before fracture, the crack is no longer an effective stress concentrator. Instead, the presence of the crack merely serves to reduce the load-bearing area. In this regime the failure stress is conventionally assumed to be the average of the yield and ultimate strengths of the alloy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Engineering Applications of Fracture Mechanics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The folowing information is needed for a fracture mechanics prediction of failure:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Applied load&lt;br /&gt;
*Residual stress&lt;br /&gt;
*Size and shape of the part&lt;br /&gt;
*Size, shape, location, and orientation of the crack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually not all of this information is available and pessimistic assumptions have to be made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally post-mortem fracture-mechanics analyses are carried out. In the absence of an extreme overload, the causes are either insufficient toughness (K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;) or an excessively large crack that was not detected during routine inspection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Short Summary ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arising from the manufacturing process, interior and surface flaws are found in all metal structures. Not all such flaws are unstable under service conditions. Fracture mechanics is the analysis of flaws to discover those that are safe (that is, do not grow) and those that are liable to propagate as cracks and so cause [[structural failure|failure]] of the flawed structure. Fracture mechanics as a subject for critical study has barely been around for a century and thus is relatively new. There is a high demand for engineers with fracture mechanics expertise - particularly in this day and age where engineering failure is considered &#039;shocking&#039; amongst the general public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== APPENDIX: Mathematical Relations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Griffith&#039;s Energy Relation&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the simple case of a thin rectangular plate with a crack perpendicular to the load Griffith’s theory becomes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G = \frac{\pi \sigma^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G is the strain energy release rate, σ is the applied stress, a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. The strain energy release rate can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate at which energy is absorbed by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, we also have that:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_c = \frac{\pi \sigma_f^2 a}{E}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(2)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the critical strain energy release rate (also [[fracture energy]]), σ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;f&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[brittle fracture stress]], a is half the crack length, and E is the [[Elastic modulus|Young’s modulus]]. This [[fracture energy]] can otherwise be understood as: &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;the rate of strain energy release by growth of the crack&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If G ≥ G&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;, this is the criterion for which the crack will begin to propagate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Irwin&#039;s Modification of Griffith&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually a modification of Griffith’s theory emerged from this work; a term called [[stress intensity]] replaced strain energy release rate and a term called [[fracture toughness]] replaced surface energy. Both of these terms are simply related to the energy terms that Griffith used:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_I = \sigma \sqrt{\pi a}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{E G_c}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane stress]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(4)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K_c = \sqrt{\frac{E G_c}{1 - \nu^2}}\,&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (for [[plane strain]])&amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp; &amp;amp;nbsp;(5)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; is the [[stress intensity]], K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; the [[fracture toughness]], and ν is [[Poisson ratio|Poisson’s ratio]]. Fracture occurs when K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; ≥ K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;. For the special case of plane strain deformation, K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; becomes K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; and is considered a material property. The subscript I arises because of the different ways of loading a material to enable a crack to propagate. It refers to loading via Mode I - the most common form of loading:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three ways of applying a force to enable a crack to propagate:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode I - Opening mode (a [[tensile stress]] normal to the plane of the crack)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode II - Sliding mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and perpendicular to the crack front)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Mode III - Tearing mode (a [[shear stress]] acting parallel to the plane of the crack and parallel to the crack front)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that the expression for K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;I&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; in Eq (3) will be different for geometries other than the center cracked plate, as discussed in the article on [[stress intensity]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_________________________________________________________&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The complex mathematics employed in this approach is  summarized on the [http://www.engin.brown.edu/courses/EN175/Notes/Failure_Plasfrac/Failure_Plasfrac.htm Brown University Engineering Web Page]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because engineers became accustomed to using K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to characterize fracture toughness, a relation has been used to reduce J&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; to it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
      K&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt; = {EJ&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Ic&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;/(1 - ν&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;}&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1/2&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;              (6)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
C. P. Buckley, &amp;quot;Material Failure&amp;quot;, lecture notes (2005), [[University of Oxford]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[fatigue (material)|Fatigue fracture]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Engineering]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materials science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Bruchmechanik]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[zh:断裂力学]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>129.67.62.226</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>