IdeaWazaWiki - User contributions [en]

Archive:Fanboy

2006-08-26T20:10:22Z

67.180.171.92: /* Television */

:''For the comic book character, see [[Fan Boy]]. For the film, see [[Fanboys (film)]]''

'' '''Fanboy''' '' or '' '''fanboi''' '' is a term used to describe an individual (usually male, though the feminine version ''fangirl'' may be used for females) who is utterly devoted to a single subject or [[hobby]], often to the point where it is considered an [[obsession]].

In [[computing]], the word is used somewhat differently - referring to someone [[Computer zealotry|slavishly supportive]] of their preferred operating system, computer programming language or brand of computer hardware and will predictably support their superiority in debates. [http://thedailywtf.com/forums/AddPost.aspx?PostID=24177&Quote=True][http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/06/02/when-the-bough-breaks][http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2005-10-25-008-26-OS-HL-SW-0002][http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=14891&comment_id=133439].

==History of fanboys and the term==
The term originated in [[comic book]] circles, to describe someone who immersed himself in the fictional worlds of comics and the culture of comics fandom. The term is often used in a derogatory manner by other less obsessed fans. In the songs of the fannish [[parody]] [[musician]] [[Luke Ski]], many characters proudly consider themselves ''fanboys''. The term is most commonly associated with adolescent and teen males but can be applicable to any age or sex. Common subjects of reverence by fanboys are [[TV show]]s, [[film|movie]]s, [[music]], [[anime]], [[car]]s, [[video game console]]s, [[video games]], [[operating system]]s, [[MMORPG]]s, and [[software]] companies.

The stereotypical image of the fanboy is as an unkempt, socially awkward, young man who may be perceived as a loud mouthed [[pseudo-intellectual]]. A popular depiction of this stereotype is the [[Comic Book Guy]] on ''[[The Simpsons]]''.

The earliest use of the word "fanboy" has been dated to 1982, to the cover of the "Official Underground and Newave Comix Price Guide". On this cover page are sketched overweight, overzealous comic book collectors wearing T-shirts that state "Fanboys of America," and are describing the extreme measures they would go to, including moving to San Francisco, to preserve their comics. Another early use is in a smart-alec editorial reply by "[[Ambush Bug]]" to a letter in his comic in [[1985]].

Many fanboys can display an intense obsession with the object of their affections. This is often shown by their devotion to a company/product/character, often to the detriment of their sense of veracity or critical judgment. This condition often coincides with bouts of heavy denial and a marked resistance to any type of meaningful or significant change in the status quo of the obsession, as noted in the controversy surrounding the introduction of [[Green Lantern]] [[Kyle Rayner]].

==Trivia==
The word "Fanboys" can be a mnemonic for the [[Grammatical conjunction|coordinating conjunction]]s of the English language: "for", "and", "nor", "but", "or", "yet", and "so".

==Media==
===Comic Book===
*[[Sergio Aragonés]]' ''Fanboy''
*Doug Holverson's "Fanboy" (anthropomorphized rotary fan obsessed with comics, who uses his electrical plug for a hand). Dates from the prolific minicomic wave of the 1980s.

===Television===
*''[[Freakazoid!|Freakazoid]]'''s [[freakazoid!#Other_characters|Fan Boy]]
The Simpsons Comic Book Guy

===Radio/Podcasts===
*[[Fanboy Radio]] - [http://fanboyradio.com]
*Drooling FanBoy - [http://droolingfanboy.com]
*ifanboy - [http://www.ifanboy.com]
*[[The Fanboy Smackdown Podcast]] - [http://www.fanboysmackdown.com]

===Webcomics===
*Fanboy Almanac (webcomic) - [http://fanboyalmanac.com Fanboy Almanac]
*[http://www.ngeb.net/fanboys Fanboys web comic]
*[http://www.fogclub.net Fanboy Otaku Gamers Club web comic]
*[http://www.fanboysonline.com Fanboys!! Beyond Geekdom!!! (webcomic)]
*[http://www.fanboys-online.com Fanboys-Online]

===Video Games===
*[http://www.dsfanboy.com DS Fanboy]
*[http://www.pspfanboy.com PSP Fanboy]
*[http://www.nintendowiifanboy.com Nintendo Wii Fanboy]

==See also==
* [[Addiction]]
* [[Otaku]]
* [[Anorak (slang)|Anorak]]

== External links ==
* [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fanboy Urban dictionary: fanboy]
* [http://www.netjak.com/review.php/1013 Dissecting the Fanboy Mind] - A discussion of the fanboy behavior in regards to video games.

[[Category:Fandom]]
[[Category:Anime and manga terminology]]
[[de:Fanboy]]

Archive:Fanboy

2006-08-26T20:09:22Z

67.180.171.92: /* Television */

:''For the comic book character, see [[Fan Boy]]. For the film, see [[Fanboys (film)]]''

'' '''Fanboy''' '' or '' '''fanboi''' '' is a term used to describe an individual (usually male, though the feminine version ''fangirl'' may be used for females) who is utterly devoted to a single subject or [[hobby]], often to the point where it is considered an [[obsession]].

In [[computing]], the word is used somewhat differently - referring to someone [[Computer zealotry|slavishly supportive]] of their preferred operating system, computer programming language or brand of computer hardware and will predictably support their superiority in debates. [http://thedailywtf.com/forums/AddPost.aspx?PostID=24177&Quote=True][http://diveintomark.org/archives/2006/06/02/when-the-bough-breaks][http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2005-10-25-008-26-OS-HL-SW-0002][http://www.osnews.com/permalink.php?news_id=14891&comment_id=133439].

==History of fanboys and the term==
The term originated in [[comic book]] circles, to describe someone who immersed himself in the fictional worlds of comics and the culture of comics fandom. The term is often used in a derogatory manner by other less obsessed fans. In the songs of the fannish [[parody]] [[musician]] [[Luke Ski]], many characters proudly consider themselves ''fanboys''. The term is most commonly associated with adolescent and teen males but can be applicable to any age or sex. Common subjects of reverence by fanboys are [[TV show]]s, [[film|movie]]s, [[music]], [[anime]], [[car]]s, [[video game console]]s, [[video games]], [[operating system]]s, [[MMORPG]]s, and [[software]] companies.

The stereotypical image of the fanboy is as an unkempt, socially awkward, young man who may be perceived as a loud mouthed [[pseudo-intellectual]]. A popular depiction of this stereotype is the [[Comic Book Guy]] on ''[[The Simpsons]]''.

The earliest use of the word "fanboy" has been dated to 1982, to the cover of the "Official Underground and Newave Comix Price Guide". On this cover page are sketched overweight, overzealous comic book collectors wearing T-shirts that state "Fanboys of America," and are describing the extreme measures they would go to, including moving to San Francisco, to preserve their comics. Another early use is in a smart-alec editorial reply by "[[Ambush Bug]]" to a letter in his comic in [[1985]].

Many fanboys can display an intense obsession with the object of their affections. This is often shown by their devotion to a company/product/character, often to the detriment of their sense of veracity or critical judgment. This condition often coincides with bouts of heavy denial and a marked resistance to any type of meaningful or significant change in the status quo of the obsession, as noted in the controversy surrounding the introduction of [[Green Lantern]] [[Kyle Rayner]].

==Trivia==
The word "Fanboys" can be a mnemonic for the [[Grammatical conjunction|coordinating conjunction]]s of the English language: "for", "and", "nor", "but", "or", "yet", and "so".

==Media==
===Comic Book===
*[[Sergio Aragonés]]' ''Fanboy''
*Doug Holverson's "Fanboy" (anthropomorphized rotary fan obsessed with comics, who uses his electrical plug for a hand). Dates from the prolific minicomic wave of the 1980s.

===Television===
*''[[Freakazoid!|Freakazoid]]'''s [[freakazoid!#Other_characters|Fan Boy]]

===Radio/Podcasts===
*[[Fanboy Radio]] - [http://fanboyradio.com]
*Drooling FanBoy - [http://droolingfanboy.com]
*ifanboy - [http://www.ifanboy.com]
*[[The Fanboy Smackdown Podcast]] - [http://www.fanboysmackdown.com]

===Webcomics===
*Fanboy Almanac (webcomic) - [http://fanboyalmanac.com Fanboy Almanac]
*[http://www.ngeb.net/fanboys Fanboys web comic]
*[http://www.fogclub.net Fanboy Otaku Gamers Club web comic]
*[http://www.fanboysonline.com Fanboys!! Beyond Geekdom!!! (webcomic)]
*[http://www.fanboys-online.com Fanboys-Online]

===Video Games===
*[http://www.dsfanboy.com DS Fanboy]
*[http://www.pspfanboy.com PSP Fanboy]
*[http://www.nintendowiifanboy.com Nintendo Wii Fanboy]

==See also==
* [[Addiction]]
* [[Otaku]]
* [[Anorak (slang)|Anorak]]

== External links ==
* [http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fanboy Urban dictionary: fanboy]
* [http://www.netjak.com/review.php/1013 Dissecting the Fanboy Mind] - A discussion of the fanboy behavior in regards to video games.

[[Category:Fandom]]
[[Category:Anime and manga terminology]]
[[de:Fanboy]]

Aestheticization as propaganda

2006-06-03T01:27:10Z

67.180.145.84:

{{Sem}}
[[Aesthetics]] is the branch of [[philosophy]] that studies the nature of [[beauty]] and the [[moral]] [[Value (ethics)|value]] of [[art]], so '''aestheticization as [[propaganda]]''' is the process of presenting any form of [[violence]] or other behaviour considered dangerous or threatening as an acceptable means of promoting a political aim even though, in extreme cases, it may involve the injury or death of people. Each culture will formulate mechanisms for considering the acceptability of behaviour and its outcomes. For example, [[utilitarianism]] may take the [[ontological]] view that the greatest good will be achieved for the largest number of people if violence is used in particular situations, i.e. morality as utility is expressed in the form of a cost-benefit analysis. Propaganda is a method used to influence the [[discourse]] by offering alternative constructions of the [[paradigm]]s of social acceptability, no matter whether the tests are described as moral, ethical, pragmatic or otherwise. Anything that is said or shown through the mass media can be true or false, sincere or dishonest, but propaganda is distinguishable from conventional types of political or religious communication. In [[communication theory]] it is described as [[framing (communication theory)|framing]] in that the words or images selected are packaged to sell an interpretation of events to a specific audience. If the framing is successful, the paradigms will expand to admit the proposed or actual violence into the class of events considered acceptable (or, in some cases, desirable).

==The aestheticization of violence for political purposes==
Though many tools are available for political purposes, the threat or use of violence attracts those of a more proactive disposition as the simplest way to resolve any conflict or achieve any ends, because its strategies are well-known and weapons easily obtained. When asked to identify alternative nonviolent techniques, people find it difficult to visualise effective methods; moreover, sceptics can quickly raise moral and practical dilemmas to complicate any set of choices until violence appears the easiest option. Thus, this topic is relevant across a spectrum of causes from those disagree about social or commercial practices within their local community, to those unhappy with the political regime in their own country, to those who believe that another country is a threat.

Nevertheless, a person or group wishing to use violence as a strategy must overcome objections from both prospective supporters and the other interested parties. No cause will prosper until the majority agrees with the justifications offered for the decision to use force, because all who adopt aggressive strategies require emotional and logistical support from the local community for success. Hence, the aestheticization process is used to direct the audience's interpretation of events by shifting the [[value (Semiotics)|values]] of the [[lexical (Semiotics)|lexical]] words used to minimise consideration of the moral, ethical or other costs. In ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]'', [[George Orwell]] proposed that the means to achieve complete control of people's minds or their ability to think rationally about the issues at stake is to invent a new language, more primitive and less articulate than current "oldspeak". That is the intention of aestheticization. It seeks to subvert the rationality of the current paradigms through ''doublespeak'' and ''goodthink'', and to persuade the majority that the use of violence in the particular context is not merely necessary or expedient, but just and glorious in the prosecution of higher ideals. Whether the use of violence is or is not justifiable is irrelevant for these purposes. The sole interest lies in the mechanism for the transfer of the particular use from the paradigm of unacceptable into the paradigm of acceptable. In contemporary terms, this brings [[semiotics]] into a position of prominence both to set the frame and to deconstruct it.

==An example of semiotic analysis==
In January, 2003, the U.S. implemented a battle plan based on a concept developed at the National Defense University. Called "[[Shock and Awe]]" (see [[Americanism (semiotics)|Americanism]]), its stated purpose was the psychological destruction of the enemy's will to fight rather than the physical destruction of his military forces. The choice of name is revealing, even at a [[denotation (Semiotics)|denotative]] level. ''Shock'' refers to the surprise and distress caused by events and, when associated with battles, means the violent interaction of individuals or groups as they join in combat. Meanwhile, ''awe'' is an overwhelming sense of wonder or admiration that may, to a greater or lesser extent, be associated with fear. But, at a [[connotation (Semiotics)|connotative]] level, the use of the words is intended to fulfil several distinct aims:

*In reality, the army may be going to kill large numbers of people, both combatant and non-combatant. These words are not the [[action (philosophy)|action]]s but they represent them at a [[symbolic]] level. Analysis shows that the words fall within the [[paradigm]] of [[lexical (Semiotics)|lexical]] words signifying the [[emotion]]al responses to external stimuli: responses that can only be experienced by those who are alive. The intended [[implication (pragmatics)|implication]] is that enemy soldiers and civilians will be so disoriented by the display of power that they will simply surrender rather than face the threatened injury or death. Hence, the enemy casualty count will be low and the immediate gains will significantly outweigh the moral, ethical or other costs of the enterprise.

*All warfare involves death and destruction on a scale that may be shocking to the sensibilities of the ordinary person, so what is the [[value (Semiotics)|value]] of these words? Applying the [[commutation test (Semiotics)|commutation test]], substitutes for "shock" might be:
**excitement, impact, and surprise, as opposed to:
**scare, trauma, and upset.
*The substitutes for "awe" might be:
**admiration, reverence and wonder, as opposed to
**fear, horror, and terror.
*Both words are capable of signifying less appealing qualities but, by setting them in a conjoined relationship, the expectation is that they will both be given the same value. The ''sui generis'' rule applies so that second and subsequent words in a conjoined sequence define the class. Evaluating the substitutes for "shock", the degree of match as [[synonym]]s seems reasonably adjacent and the balance of connotation can be considered balanced. This would give the word "shock" a relatively neutral value. Since the preponderance of connotation to "awe" is positive (the negative substitutes are less directly synonymous), the relationship in the phrase is intended to invoke values suggesting a certain degree of magnificence in the technology and the manner of its delivery. Not only those on the receiving end are expected to experience awe: all external observers may be impressed by this display of power, and, perhaps, feel not a little afraid — a useful general propaganda gain.

*The connotation of the word ''awe'' tends to refer to unequal power relationships, e.g. a beginner may be in awe of the skills of a professional, an ordinary mortal is in awe of a deity, etc. The implication is that this war is such an asymmetrical contest that the ''enemy'' might just as well give up before the battle is joined with such an overwhelmingly superior force.

*Figurative usages provide what the semiotician [[Roland Barthes]] called a "pleasure of the text" (1970), i.e. the pleasurable reaction produced by a clever arrangement of [[sign (semiotics)|signs]]. So [[literal and figurative language|figurative]] words are more memorable than literal words, particularly when used in unexpected contexts. Using this phrase in the otherwise literal context of declaring the opening of violent hostilities is incongruous and that contextualisation has made the phrase memorable, effectively displacing all the imagery of imminent death and destruction that might otherwise have dominated.

*Monosyllabic words wield considerable [[rhetoric]]al might: they are short, punchy, and memorable. Through the careful mixing of short and long words, the impact provided by the short words stands out against the rhythmic flow provided by long words. Rhetorical theory maintains that any proposition can be expressed in a variety of ways. Hence, when persuasion is the overriding goal, the rhetorical perspective suggests that the manner in which a statement is expressed may be more important than its propositional content. In this instance, the repetition of two sounds, a binary pair of semi-[[onomatopoeic]] words, produces [[hyperbole]]. Whether written or spoken with an appropriate intonation and body language, the phrase is memorable and serves its aestheticization function.

==References==
* Barthes, Roland (1970/1988), "The Old Rhetoric: An Aide-Memoire," in ''The Semiotic Challenge''. tr. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.

[[Category:Aesthetics]]
[[Category:Semiotics]]
[[Category:Violence]]

American River College

2006-03-31T08:23:00Z

67.180.143.126:

[[Image:Arc-website.gif|thumb|right|American River Collge Website]]

'''American River College''' (ARC) is a two-year [[Community college|community college]] located in [[Sacramento, California| Sacramento]] in [[Sacramento County]], [[California]].

The college was opened in 1955 as American River Junior College, on the site of the old Grant Technical College. In 1965 the college became a part of the [[Los Rios Community College District]] and became American River College. Today, along with [[Cosumnes River College]], [[Folsom Lake College]] and [[Sacramento City College]], ARC is directed by a seven-member board of trustees elected by voters residing in the district.

Current enrollment is 34,000 full-time and part-time students, making it one of the largest community colleges in California.

It is the choice of many students in the greater Sacramento area, serving as a launching point for the competitive four-year universities such as the University of California, Davis and California State University, Sacramento.
==External link==
* [http://www.arc.losrios.edu Official webpage]

{{US-university-stub}}

[[Category:California Community Colleges system]]
[[Category:Sacramento County, California]]