<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://ideawaza.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=68.90.0.0%2F16</id>
	<title>IdeaWazaWiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://ideawaza.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=68.90.0.0%2F16"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.90.0.0/16"/>
	<updated>2026-09-29T18:09:35Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.46.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Principles_of_Management&amp;diff=21219</id>
		<title>Principles of Management</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Principles_of_Management&amp;diff=21219"/>
		<updated>2007-01-04T21:30:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;68.90.193.132: /* The Principles */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Principles of Management are the essential, underlying factors that form the foundations of successful management. According to Henri Fayol (1841-1925) in his book &#039;&#039;General and Industrial Management&#039;&#039;, there are fourteen &#039;principles of management&#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Principles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &#039;&#039;&#039;Division of Work -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The specialization of the workforce, creating specific personal and professional development within the labour force and therefore increasing productivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &#039;&#039;&#039;Authority-&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The issue of commands followed by responsibility for their consequences.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. &#039;&#039;&#039;Discipline-&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employees must obey orders in return for good leadership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &#039;&#039;&#039;Unity of Command -&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There should be individual lines of command with each person having only one boss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &#039;&#039;&#039;Unity of Direction -&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All those working in the same line of activity must understand and pursue the same objectives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &#039;&#039;&#039;Subordination of Individual Interest&#039;&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The management must put aside personal considerations and put company objectives first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. &#039;&#039;&#039;Remuneration -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Workers must be paid sufficiently as this is a chief motivation of employees and therefore greatly influences productivity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. &#039;&#039;&#039;The Degree of Centralisation -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The amount of power wealded with the central management depends on company size.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. &#039;&#039;&#039;Scalar Chain -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This refers to the number of chains in a hierarchy. There should not be too many as this may hinder communication between levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. &#039;&#039;&#039;Order -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Social order ensures the fluid operation of a company through authoritative procedure, and material order ensures safety and efficiency in the workplace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. &#039;&#039;&#039;Equity -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Employees must be treated kindly, and justice must be enacted to ensure a just workplace.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. &#039;&#039;&#039;Stability of Tenure of Personnel -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relates to Maslow&#039;s Hierarchy of Needs; employees work better if they are assured job security and career progression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. &#039;&#039;&#039;Initiative -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using the initiative of employees can add strength and new ideas to an organisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. &#039;&#039;&#039;Esprit de Corps -&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This refers to the need of managers to ensure and develop morale in the workplace, individually and communally.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These can be used to initiate and aid the processes of change, organisation, decision making, skill management and the overall view of the management function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fayol also divided the management fucntion into five key roles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- To organise&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- To plan and forecast (Prevoyance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- To command&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- To control&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- To coordinate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further Reading - ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Administration Industrielle et Général, Henri Fayol, 1917&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources - ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. http://www.12manage.com/methods_fayol_14_principles_of_management.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Administration Industrielle et Général, Henri Fayol, 1917&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About the Contributor ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grant Robinson is a student from Kent, England, and was the Managing Director of Apex Event Management, an award-winning Young Enterprise company. His username is RobbiG.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>68.90.193.132</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Project_fork&amp;diff=25602</id>
		<title>Archive:Project fork</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Project_fork&amp;diff=25602"/>
		<updated>2005-03-10T05:31:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;68.90.244.90: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&#039;&#039;This article is about &amp;quot;forking&amp;quot; a [[software development]] project. For information on &amp;quot;forking&amp;quot; a process in a [[Computer multitasking|multitasking]] or [[multithreading]] [[operating system]], see [[Fork (computing)]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[software]], a &#039;&#039;&#039;project fork&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;branch&#039;&#039;&#039; happens when a developer (or a group of them) takes code from a project and starts to develop independently of the rest. The term is also used more loosely to represent a similar branching of any work (for example, there are several forks of the English language [[Wikipedia]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term is particularly used in [[free software|free]] or [[open source]] software, when a [[schism]] occurs because of different goals or personality clashes. Some see forks as a weakness in open source, but they can demonstrate the adaptability of the model. The relationship between the different teams can be cordial or very bitter (see [[xMule]] and its fork [[aMule]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a fork of this type, both parties inherit identical [[intellectual rights]] but typically only the larger group, or that containing the original [[software architecture|architect]], will retain the full original name and its associated [[social capital]].  Thus there is a reputation penalty associated with forking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can happen in [[closed source]] software as well, if the rights to the common code are shared; but this is rarer, as usually there are strict rules about ownership of the code. More commonly in closed source software, a developer forks its own code to develop two versions, such as a [[Window (computing)|windowed]] version and a [[command line interface|command line]] version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another sort of fork is a standard practice in many projects: to fork a &#039;&#039;stable&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;release&#039;&#039; version which will be modified only for bug fixes, while a &#039;&#039;development&#039;&#039; tree continues to get new features added. This is common practice in the [[Linux kernel]], for instance, but has been misrepresented occasionally in the trade press as the more problematic sort of fork described above. [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20041121124609671]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, a fork can merge back into the original project or replace it. [[EGCS]] (Experimental/Enhanced GNU Compiler System) was a fork from [[GNU Compiler Collection|GCC]] which proved more vital than the original project and was eventually &amp;quot;blessed&amp;quot; as the official GCC project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Likewise, when development of the [[Mozilla]] suite (Seamonkey) appeared bogged down and overly beholden to [[Netscape Communications Corporation|Netscape]]&#039;s commercial needs, some Mozilla developers started a separate stripped-down [[Web browser]] project. This developed into [[Mozilla Firefox]], which has been sufficiently successful to become the primary focus of [[Mozilla Foundation]] browser activity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Enciclopedia Libre]] is a fork from the [http://es.wikipedia.org Spanish-language Wikipedia] to evade possible advertising.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pretty Good Privacy]] was forked outside of the United States to free it from the restrictive laws on the exportation of cryptographic software.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[XEmacs]] was a fork from [[Emacs]] to support the proprietary Energize environment.&lt;br /&gt;
*The split of [[Berkeley Software Distribution|BSD]] from AT&amp;amp;T [[Unix|UNIX]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The many varieties of [[proprietary]] [[Unix|UNIX]] &amp;amp;mdash; all derived from AT&amp;amp;T UNIX and all called &amp;quot;UNIX&amp;quot;, but increasingly mutually incompatible. &#039;&#039;See&#039;&#039; [[UNIX wars]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The development of the [[NTFS]] filesystem by Microsoft based upon previous work on [[HPFS]] that was left to [[IBM]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The game [[Nethack]] has spawned a number of variants using the original code (it is sometimes thought of as a fork of [[Rogue (computer game)|Rogue]], but its code was written independently).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[OpenBSD]] was originally a fork from [[NetBSD]], arising from conflicts of personality between NetBSD developers.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[OpenSSH]] was a fork from [[SSH]], which happened because the license for SSH 2.x was &amp;quot;[[non-free]]&amp;quot; (even though the source was available), so an older version of SSH 1.x, which was the last to have been licensed as [[free software]], was forked. Within months, virtually all Linux distributions, BSD versions and even some proprietary Unixes had replaced SSH with OpenSSH.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Xorg]] [[X Window System|X]] server was a fork from [[XFree86]] for a very similar reason as that of SSH and OpenSSH. Development on [[X11]] has since speeded up and most distributions have switched.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DragonflyBSD]] forked from [[FreeBSD]] in order to pursue different technical approaches to those used in FreeBSD 5.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Inkscape]] forked from [[Sodipodi]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[aMule]] is a (very hostile - op) fork of [[xMule]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[revision control]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[pl:Fork]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>68.90.244.90</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Project_fork&amp;diff=25601</id>
		<title>Archive:Project fork</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Archive:Project_fork&amp;diff=25601"/>
		<updated>2005-03-10T05:28:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;68.90.244.90: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;:&#039;&#039;This article is about &amp;quot;forking&amp;quot; a [[software development]] project. For information on &amp;quot;forking&amp;quot; a process in a [[Computer multitasking|multitasking]] or [[multithreading]] [[operating system]], see [[Fork (computing)]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[software]], a &#039;&#039;&#039;project fork&#039;&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;&#039;branch&#039;&#039;&#039; happens when a developer (or a group of them) takes code from a project and starts to develop independently of the rest. The term is also used more loosely to represent a similar branching of any work (for example, there are several forks of the English language [[Wikipedia]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term is particularly used in [[free software|free]] or [[open source]] software, when a [[schism]] occurs because of different goals or personality clashes. Some see forks as a weakness in open source, but they can demonstrate the adaptability of the model. The relationship between the different teams can be cordial or very bitter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a fork of this type, both parties inherit identical [[intellectual rights]] but typically only the larger group, or that containing the original [[software architecture|architect]], will retain the full original name and its associated [[social capital]].  Thus there is a reputation penalty associated with forking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This can happen in [[closed source]] software as well, if the rights to the common code are shared; but this is rarer, as usually there are strict rules about ownership of the code. More commonly in closed source software, a developer forks its own code to develop two versions, such as a [[Window (computing)|windowed]] version and a [[command line interface|command line]] version.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another sort of fork is a standard practice in many projects: to fork a &#039;&#039;stable&#039;&#039; or &#039;&#039;release&#039;&#039; version which will be modified only for bug fixes, while a &#039;&#039;development&#039;&#039; tree continues to get new features added. This is common practice in the [[Linux kernel]], for instance, but has been misrepresented occasionally in the trade press as the more problematic sort of fork described above. [http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20041121124609671]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, a fork can merge back into the original project or replace it. [[EGCS]] (Experimental/Enhanced GNU Compiler System) was a fork from [[GNU Compiler Collection|GCC]] which proved more vital than the original project and was eventually &amp;quot;blessed&amp;quot; as the official GCC project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Likewise, when development of the [[Mozilla]] suite (Seamonkey) appeared bogged down and overly beholden to [[Netscape Communications Corporation|Netscape]]&#039;s commercial needs, some Mozilla developers started a separate stripped-down [[Web browser]] project. This developed into [[Mozilla Firefox]], which has been sufficiently successful to become the primary focus of [[Mozilla Foundation]] browser activity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Enciclopedia Libre]] is a fork from the [http://es.wikipedia.org Spanish-language Wikipedia] to evade possible advertising.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pretty Good Privacy]] was forked outside of the United States to free it from the restrictive laws on the exportation of cryptographic software.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[XEmacs]] was a fork from [[Emacs]] to support the proprietary Energize environment.&lt;br /&gt;
*The split of [[Berkeley Software Distribution|BSD]] from AT&amp;amp;T [[Unix|UNIX]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The many varieties of [[proprietary]] [[Unix|UNIX]] &amp;amp;mdash; all derived from AT&amp;amp;T UNIX and all called &amp;quot;UNIX&amp;quot;, but increasingly mutually incompatible. &#039;&#039;See&#039;&#039; [[UNIX wars]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The development of the [[NTFS]] filesystem by Microsoft based upon previous work on [[HPFS]] that was left to [[IBM]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The game [[Nethack]] has spawned a number of variants using the original code (it is sometimes thought of as a fork of [[Rogue (computer game)|Rogue]], but its code was written independently).&lt;br /&gt;
*[[OpenBSD]] was originally a fork from [[NetBSD]], arising from conflicts of personality between NetBSD developers.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[OpenSSH]] was a fork from [[SSH]], which happened because the license for SSH 2.x was &amp;quot;[[non-free]]&amp;quot; (even though the source was available), so an older version of SSH 1.x, which was the last to have been licensed as [[free software]], was forked. Within months, virtually all Linux distributions, BSD versions and even some proprietary Unixes had replaced SSH with OpenSSH.&lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Xorg]] [[X Window System|X]] server was a fork from [[XFree86]] for a very similar reason as that of SSH and OpenSSH. Development on [[X11]] has since speeded up and most distributions have switched.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DragonflyBSD]] forked from [[FreeBSD]] in order to pursue different technical approaches to those used in FreeBSD 5.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Inkscape]] forked from [[Sodipodi]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[aMule]] is a (very hostile - op) fork of [[xMule]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[revision control]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[de:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Fork]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[pl:Fork]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>68.90.244.90</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>