Archive:Exploring science through fiction - Revision history

wikademia>Wikademia: moved Exploring science through fiction to Archive:Exploring science through fiction

2009-06-12T16:19:07Z

moved Exploring science through fiction to Archive:Exploring science through fiction

← Older revision	Revision as of 16:19, 12 June 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - 'w:' to 'Wikipedia:'

2009-04-11T18:14:11Z

Text replace - 'w:' to 'Wikipedia:'

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - 'RightTOC' to 'ntnes'

2009-04-10T17:03:54Z

Text replace - 'RightTOC' to 'ntnes'

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:03, 10 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~RightTOC~~}}		{{ntnes}}
	Welcome to '''Exploring science through fiction'''.		Welcome to '''Exploring science through fiction'''.

wikademia>Wikademia: 18 revisions

2009-03-23T11:15:58Z

18 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 11:15, 23 March 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>Proxima Centauri: /* Related resources */

2009-03-08T16:31:19Z

Related resources

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:31, 8 March 2009
Line 57:		Line 57:

	==Related resources==		==Related resources==
	* [[Fiction writing support group]]		*[[Fiction writing support group]]
	* [[Portal:Writing Center]]		*[[Portal:Writing Center]]
	* [[How Life could Evolve in a Red Dwarf Star System]]		*[[How Life could Evolve in a Red Dwarf Star System]]
			*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurelia_and_Blue_Moon Aurelia and Blue Moon]

	==External resources==		==External resources==

wikademia>JWSchmidt: /* Related resources */ How Life could Evolve in a Red Dwarf Star System

2009-03-08T15:53:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 8 March 2009
Line 59:		Line 59:
	* [[Fiction writing support group]]		* [[Fiction writing support group]]
	* [[Portal:Writing Center]]		* [[Portal:Writing Center]]
			* [[How Life could Evolve in a Red Dwarf Star System]]

	==External resources==		==External resources==

wikademia>Davichito: /* AI in fiction */

2008-10-21T16:22:34Z

AI in fiction

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:22, 21 October 2008
Line 35:		Line 35:

	===AI in fiction===		===AI in fiction===

			Artificial intelligence (AI) is a common topic found in science fiction. Although, in reality, we are very far from attaining true AI, fiction tells stories about conscious robots, cyborgs and different artificial intelligence entities. Currently, the state-of-the-art of AI has achieved some goals:

			'''''Current AI''''' (feel free to correct/add)

			*Text to speech technologies: it is the ability of a computer to pronounce a text with proper intonation and punctuation. It is famous the text-to-speech engine by Microsoft, L&H speaking engines (seen in Power Translator Delux 1.0 and then sold to Microsoft, for Encarta) and Loquendo software. Loquendo software is very advanced; it possesses many voices and most of them are very understandable for humans.
			*Writing spoken language: the counterpart of TTS technology. It is the ability to "understand" what humans say and write it in a text file. Dragon Naturally Speaking is a famous program who can do that. The user only has to train it once, for a few hours and then the program is ready to write what it hears. The software is built on an artificial neural network, so it learns and improves, according to the user. The newest version has support for many users.
			*Chess: in 1997 Deepblue AI, by IBM, won Grand Master Kasparov, from Russia, one of the best chess players in the world, with an ELO above 2800.
			*Industry robots: current technology allows robots to build cars and many automated tasks in the industry.
			*Humanoid robots: Japan is leading this technology and has made a baby robot and several male and female robots who can engage in a conversation and move their muscles, like humans. Obviously, they still lack conscience.
			*Mathematical demonstration software: there has been software which has been able to demonstrate theorems that humans could not.
			*Expert systems:

			'''''Fiction AI'''''

			*Understanding of natural language is completely achieved. See the robots series by Isaac Asimov, like ''[[w:Robots and Empire\|Robots and Empire]]'' and [[w:Foundation series\|Foundation series]].
			*Universal computer AI: [[w:The Last Question\|The Last Question]] is a short story showing the advance in computers, particularly in the AI field, until the building of a universal computer which can be thought as God.

	===Getting outside the box===		===Getting outside the box===

wikademia>Davichito: /* Projects */

2008-10-21T16:07:36Z

Projects

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:07, 21 October 2008
Line 33:		Line 33:
	==Projects==		==Projects==
	Projects devoted to using fiction writing as a tool to explore science.		Projects devoted to using fiction writing as a tool to explore science.

			===AI in fiction===

	===Getting outside the box===		===Getting outside the box===
	One of the exciting aspects of science is the seemingly endless parade of "revolutionary discoveries". "New ideas" can become part of the scientific world view and open up entire new domains of science. Two examples of revolutionary discoveries are the idea of [[w:Radioactive decay\|radioactive decay]] and [[w:Plate tectonics\|plate tectonics]]. In contrast to such successful new scientific ideas, some "old ideas" seem to endlessly resist the methods of science. For example, ideas about the possibility of "psychic" and "[[w:Supernatural\|supernatural]]" phenomena have existed in many cultures for thousands of years. As discussed in the Wikipedia article [[w:Science fiction and fantasy\|Science fiction and fantasy]], science fiction generally avoids topics such as the "supernatural" while fantasy stories are more likely to incorporate supernatural elements. However, since new elements of science continue to be discovered, how do we know where to draw the boundary between science fiction and fantasy? If "[[w:Clarke's three laws\|Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic]]," how do we know that science will not some day include explanations for "psychic" and "supernatural" phenomena? Are some ideas such as [[w:Time travel\|time travel]] always going to remain outside of the domain of science? Are scientists too constrained by preconceptions about what is and is not possible? Does current scientific thinking and beliefs about what is not possible unreasonably constrain scientific investigations of the world? Can fiction play a useful role in stimulating scientists to "think outside the box"? Has fiction played a useful role in promoting technological advances and scientific discovery in areas such as space exploration? See [[Science Fiction Challenge]], a learning project for exploring the nature and boundaries of science through science fiction writing.		One of the exciting aspects of science is the seemingly endless parade of "revolutionary discoveries". "New ideas" can become part of the scientific world view and open up entire new domains of science. Two examples of revolutionary discoveries are the idea of [[w:Radioactive decay\|radioactive decay]] and [[w:Plate tectonics\|plate tectonics]]. In contrast to such successful new scientific ideas, some "old ideas" seem to endlessly resist the methods of science. For example, ideas about the possibility of "psychic" and "[[w:Supernatural\|supernatural]]" phenomena have existed in many cultures for thousands of years. As discussed in the Wikipedia article [[w:Science fiction and fantasy\|Science fiction and fantasy]], science fiction generally avoids topics such as the "supernatural" while fantasy stories are more likely to incorporate supernatural elements. However, since new elements of science continue to be discovered, how do we know where to draw the boundary between science fiction and fantasy? If "[[w:Clarke's three laws\|Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic]]," how do we know that science will not some day include explanations for "psychic" and "supernatural" phenomena? Are some ideas such as [[w:Time travel\|time travel]] always going to remain outside of the domain of science? Are scientists too constrained by preconceptions about what is and is not possible? Does current scientific thinking and beliefs about what is not possible unreasonably constrain scientific investigations of the world? Can fiction play a useful role in stimulating scientists to "think outside the box"? Has fiction played a useful role in promoting technological advances and scientific discovery in areas such as space exploration? See [[Science Fiction Challenge]], a learning project for exploring the nature and boundaries of science through science fiction writing.

wikademia>Davichito: /* Reading */

2008-10-21T16:06:58Z

Reading

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 21 October 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Ordered by date of addition, recent changes go first:		Ordered by date of addition, recent changes go first:

	''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Celestial_Plot The celestial plot]'', by [[w:Adolfo Bioy Casares]]. It is a short story about multiple universes, 10 years before the scientific theory.		''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Celestial_Plot The celestial plot]'', by [[w:Adolfo Bioy Casares\|Adolfo Bioy Casares]]. It is a short story about multiple universes, 10 years before the scientific theory.
	A soldier travels to an alternate present.		A soldier travels to an alternate present.

	''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Garden_of_Forking_Paths The Garden of Forking Paths]'', by [[w:Jorge Luis Borges]]. It is a short story about parallel universes too, with a symbolic labyrinth.		''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Garden_of_Forking_Paths The Garden of Forking Paths]'', by [[w:Jorge Luis Borges\|Jorge Luis Borges]]. It is a short story about parallel universes too, with a symbolic labyrinth.

	''Paths to Otherwhere'' by [[w:James P. Hogan (writer)\|James Hogan]] - the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation\|Many-worlds interpretation]] and quantum theory. If there are "parallel universes", how would we ever know?		''Paths to Otherwhere'' by [[w:James P. Hogan (writer)\|James Hogan]] - the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation\|Many-worlds interpretation]] and quantum theory. If there are "parallel universes", how would we ever know?

wikademia>Davichito: /* Reading */

2008-10-21T16:06:19Z

Reading

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:06, 21 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	==Reading==		==Reading==

			Ordered by date of addition, recent changes go first:

			''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Celestial_Plot The celestial plot]'', by [[w:Adolfo Bioy Casares]]. It is a short story about multiple universes, 10 years before the scientific theory.
			A soldier travels to an alternate present.

			''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Garden_of_Forking_Paths The Garden of Forking Paths]'', by [[w:Jorge Luis Borges]]. It is a short story about parallel universes too, with a symbolic labyrinth.

	''Paths to Otherwhere'' by [[w:James P. Hogan (writer)\|James Hogan]] - the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation\|Many-worlds interpretation]] and quantum theory. If there are "parallel universes", how would we ever know?		''Paths to Otherwhere'' by [[w:James P. Hogan (writer)\|James Hogan]] - the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation\|Many-worlds interpretation]] and quantum theory. If there are "parallel universes", how would we ever know?

Line 22:		Line 30:
	* ..		* ..
	-->		-->

	==Projects==		==Projects==
	Projects devoted to using fiction writing as a tool to explore science.		Projects devoted to using fiction writing as a tool to explore science.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 11 April 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Ordered by date of addition, recent changes go first:		Ordered by date of addition, recent changes go first:

	''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Celestial_Plot The celestial plot]'', by [[w:Adolfo Bioy Casares\|Adolfo Bioy Casares]]. It is a short story about multiple universes, 10 years before the scientific theory.		''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Celestial_Plot The celestial plot]'', by [[Wikipedia:Adolfo Bioy Casares\|Adolfo Bioy Casares]]. It is a short story about multiple universes, 10 years before the scientific theory.
	A soldier travels to an alternate present.		A soldier travels to an alternate present.

	''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Garden_of_Forking_Paths The Garden of Forking Paths]'', by [[w:Jorge Luis Borges\|Jorge Luis Borges]]. It is a short story about parallel universes too, with a symbolic labyrinth.		''[http://literature.wikia.com/wiki/The_Garden_of_Forking_Paths The Garden of Forking Paths]'', by [[Wikipedia:Jorge Luis Borges\|Jorge Luis Borges]]. It is a short story about parallel universes too, with a symbolic labyrinth.

	''Paths to Otherwhere'' by [[w:James P. Hogan (writer)\|James Hogan]] - the [[w:Many-worlds interpretation\|Many-worlds interpretation]] and quantum theory. If there are "parallel universes", how would we ever know?		''Paths to Otherwhere'' by [[Wikipedia:James P. Hogan (writer)\|James Hogan]] - the [[Wikipedia:Many-worlds interpretation\|Many-worlds interpretation]] and quantum theory. If there are "parallel universes", how would we ever know?

	[[w:Stephen Baxter\|Stephen Baxter]]'s [[w:Manifold Trilogy\|Manifold Trilogy]]) - do stellar gamma-ray generating events seriously impact the evolution of biological organisms?		[[Wikipedia:Stephen Baxter\|Stephen Baxter]]'s [[Wikipedia:Manifold Trilogy\|Manifold Trilogy]]) - do stellar gamma-ray generating events seriously impact the evolution of biological organisms?

	[[w:Marvin Minsky\|Marvin Minsky]]'s ''The Turing Option'' - artificial intelligence as compared to biological intelligence. Will it ever be possible to "download" a human mind into a man-made computer?		[[Wikipedia:Marvin Minsky\|Marvin Minsky]]'s ''The Turing Option'' - artificial intelligence as compared to biological intelligence. Will it ever be possible to "download" a human mind into a man-made computer?

	''[[w:Assignment Nor'Dyren\|Assignment Nor'Dyren]]'' by [[w:Sydney J. Van Scyoc\|Sydney J. Van Scyoc]] - introduction to genetic and social engineering. Would it be possible to use genetic engineering to create an optimal social structure?		''[[Wikipedia:Assignment Nor'Dyren\|Assignment Nor'Dyren]]'' by [[Wikipedia:Sydney J. Van Scyoc\|Sydney J. Van Scyoc]] - introduction to genetic and social engineering. Would it be possible to use genetic engineering to create an optimal social structure?

	''[[w:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy\|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'' by [[w:Douglas Adams\|Douglas Adams]]. A common theme of science fiction is speculation about the ultimate effects of technology on human existence. Some authors have imagined that all technological discoveries and changes will be accomplished in the distant future while others have suggested that technological change is a fundamentally exponential process that will culminate in the relatively near future ([[w:Technological singularity\|Technological singularity]]). Many such speculations involve a role for [[w:Strong AI\|intelligent devices]] that might be able to catalyze technological change at a very rapid pace. Douglas Adams turned such speculations on their head and wrote about computing deices of the future that reveal the ultimate truth of the universe to be an absurdity. Why is it natural for people to imagine that there are fundamental questions about the universe that we should be able to answer using technology? See:[[The Question]].		''[[Wikipedia:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy\|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'' by [[Wikipedia:Douglas Adams\|Douglas Adams]]. A common theme of science fiction is speculation about the ultimate effects of technology on human existence. Some authors have imagined that all technological discoveries and changes will be accomplished in the distant future while others have suggested that technological change is a fundamentally exponential process that will culminate in the relatively near future ([[Wikipedia:Technological singularity\|Technological singularity]]). Many such speculations involve a role for [[Wikipedia:Strong AI\|intelligent devices]] that might be able to catalyze technological change at a very rapid pace. Douglas Adams turned such speculations on their head and wrote about computing deices of the future that reveal the ultimate truth of the universe to be an absurdity. Why is it natural for people to imagine that there are fundamental questions about the universe that we should be able to answer using technology? See:[[The Question]].

	''[[w:Greg Egan\|Greg Egan]]'s [[w:Oceanic\|Oceanic]]'', etc, freely on-line at [http://www.freesfonline.de/authors/Greg_Egan.html].		''[[Wikipedia:Greg Egan\|Greg Egan]]'s [[Wikipedia:Oceanic\|Oceanic]]'', etc, freely on-line at [http://www.freesfonline.de/authors/Greg_Egan.html].
	<!--		<!--
	*Add more...		*Add more...
Line 50:		Line 50:
	'''''Fiction AI'''''		'''''Fiction AI'''''

	*Understanding of natural language is completely achieved. See the robots series by Isaac Asimov, like ''[[w:Robots and Empire\|Robots and Empire]]'' and [[w:Foundation series\|Foundation series]].		*Understanding of natural language is completely achieved. See the robots series by Isaac Asimov, like ''[[Wikipedia:Robots and Empire\|Robots and Empire]]'' and [[Wikipedia:Foundation series\|Foundation series]].
	*Universal computer AI: [[w:The Last Question\|The Last Question]] is a short story showing the advance in computers, particularly in the AI field, until the building of a universal computer which can be thought as God.		*Universal computer AI: [[Wikipedia:The Last Question\|The Last Question]] is a short story showing the advance in computers, particularly in the AI field, until the building of a universal computer which can be thought as God.

	===Getting outside the box===		===Getting outside the box===
	One of the exciting aspects of science is the seemingly endless parade of "revolutionary discoveries". "New ideas" can become part of the scientific world view and open up entire new domains of science. Two examples of revolutionary discoveries are the idea of [[w:Radioactive decay\|radioactive decay]] and [[w:Plate tectonics\|plate tectonics]]. In contrast to such successful new scientific ideas, some "old ideas" seem to endlessly resist the methods of science. For example, ideas about the possibility of "psychic" and "[[w:Supernatural\|supernatural]]" phenomena have existed in many cultures for thousands of years. As discussed in the Wikipedia article [[w:Science fiction and fantasy\|Science fiction and fantasy]], science fiction generally avoids topics such as the "supernatural" while fantasy stories are more likely to incorporate supernatural elements. However, since new elements of science continue to be discovered, how do we know where to draw the boundary between science fiction and fantasy? If "[[w:Clarke's three laws\|Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic]]," how do we know that science will not some day include explanations for "psychic" and "supernatural" phenomena? Are some ideas such as [[w:Time travel\|time travel]] always going to remain outside of the domain of science? Are scientists too constrained by preconceptions about what is and is not possible? Does current scientific thinking and beliefs about what is not possible unreasonably constrain scientific investigations of the world? Can fiction play a useful role in stimulating scientists to "think outside the box"? Has fiction played a useful role in promoting technological advances and scientific discovery in areas such as space exploration? See [[Science Fiction Challenge]], a learning project for exploring the nature and boundaries of science through science fiction writing.		One of the exciting aspects of science is the seemingly endless parade of "revolutionary discoveries". "New ideas" can become part of the scientific world view and open up entire new domains of science. Two examples of revolutionary discoveries are the idea of [[Wikipedia:Radioactive decay\|radioactive decay]] and [[Wikipedia:Plate tectonics\|plate tectonics]]. In contrast to such successful new scientific ideas, some "old ideas" seem to endlessly resist the methods of science. For example, ideas about the possibility of "psychic" and "[[Wikipedia:Supernatural\|supernatural]]" phenomena have existed in many cultures for thousands of years. As discussed in the Wikipedia article [[Wikipedia:Science fiction and fantasy\|Science fiction and fantasy]], science fiction generally avoids topics such as the "supernatural" while fantasy stories are more likely to incorporate supernatural elements. However, since new elements of science continue to be discovered, how do we know where to draw the boundary between science fiction and fantasy? If "[[Wikipedia:Clarke's three laws\|Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic]]," how do we know that science will not some day include explanations for "psychic" and "supernatural" phenomena? Are some ideas such as [[Wikipedia:Time travel\|time travel]] always going to remain outside of the domain of science? Are scientists too constrained by preconceptions about what is and is not possible? Does current scientific thinking and beliefs about what is not possible unreasonably constrain scientific investigations of the world? Can fiction play a useful role in stimulating scientists to "think outside the box"? Has fiction played a useful role in promoting technological advances and scientific discovery in areas such as space exploration? See [[Science Fiction Challenge]], a learning project for exploring the nature and boundaries of science through science fiction writing.

	==Related resources==		==Related resources==