Archive:Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience - Revision history

wikademia>Wikademia: moved Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience to Archive:Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience

2009-06-27T06:47:47Z

moved Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience to Archive:Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:47, 27 June 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - '[[Topic:' to '[['

2009-06-08T03:58:29Z

Text replace - '[[Topic:' to '[['

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:58, 8 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:

	Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[~~Topic:~~Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[~~Topic:~~Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].		Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].

	Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[Wikipedia:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.		Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[Wikipedia:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.

	I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."		I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - '[[School:' to '[['

2009-06-08T03:39:04Z

Text replace - '[[School:' to '[['

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:39, 8 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:

	Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[~~School:~~Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].		Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].

	Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[Wikipedia:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[~~School:~~Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.		Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[Wikipedia:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.

	I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."		I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."

wikademia>Wikademia at 06:27, 22 April 2009

2009-04-22T06:27:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:27, 22 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<big>'''Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience'''</big><BR>~~
	Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].		Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].

wikademia>Wikademia at 06:27, 22 April 2009

2009-04-22T06:27:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:27, 22 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{User:JWSchmidt/Blog/Navigation}}~~

	<big>'''Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience'''</big><BR>		<big>'''Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience'''</big><BR>
	Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].		Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - 'w:' to 'Wikipedia:'

2009-04-11T18:18:40Z

Text replace - 'w:' to 'Wikipedia:'

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 11 April 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].		Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].

	Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[w:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[School:Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.		Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[Wikipedia:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[School:Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.

	I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."		I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - 'Wikiversity' to 'Wikademia'

2009-04-11T05:09:12Z

Text replace - 'Wikiversity' to 'Wikademia'

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 11 April 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].		Continuing activity at [[Science and the nonphysical]] finally prompted my to get around to making [[Psuedoscience]] and [[Protoscience]] to complement [[What is science?]]. I'm now thinking about the possibility of starting something like [[Topic:Intelligent Design]] as a content development project within [[School:Doing science]]. If there really is a way to scientifically study anything, then it should be possible to have learning resources about how to conduct a scientific investigation into the possibility of Intelligent Design. However, my imagination only extends to a kind of expanded science of [[Topic:Exobiology]] that would involve searching for indications of an extraterrestrial intelligence that might have previously influence the course of life on Earth. This might also be a constructive direction along which to develop [[UFO research]].

	Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[w:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[School:Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a ~~Wikiversity~~ learning project.		Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[w:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[School:Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikademia learning project.

	I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."		I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."

wikademia>Wikademia: moved User:JWSchmidt/Blog/25 February 2007 to Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience

2009-04-10T19:54:05Z

moved User:JWSchmidt/Blog/25 February 2007 to Science, Protoscience, Pseudoscience

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:54, 10 April 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>Wikademia: 2 revisions

2009-04-10T19:53:35Z

2 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:53, 10 April 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>JWSchmidt: A community experiment with fully open and published peer review

2007-02-26T21:45:56Z

A community experiment with fully open and published peer review

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 26 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[w:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[School:Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikiversity learning project.		Another possibility would be to do something along the lines of [[w:Mind-Body Intervention\|Mind-Body Intervention]]. This could have the advantage of providing a sensible start to Complementary and Alternative Medicine within [[School:Medicine]]. Mind-Body Intervention does not even make the main page of the website for the [http://nccam.nih.gov/ U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine]. Their main [http://nccam.nih.gov/health/backgrounds/mindbody.htm mind-body page] lists 19 references that would be a reasonable reading list for a Wikiversity learning project.

			I noticed today that the article "[http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=1397803 A community experiment with fully open and published peer review]" says this, "The journal will publish 'essentially anything', even papers that receive three unanimously negative reviews, the only conditions being that three Editorial Board members agree to review (or solicit a review for) the manuscript and that the work qualifies as scientific (not pseudoscientific as is the case for intelligent design or creationism) – and, of course, that the author wants his/her paper published alongside the reviews it receives."