Feeling Reflection Theorem - Revision history

wikademia>Eme at 00:12, 19 November 2010

2010-11-19T00:12:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, 19 November 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{dated prod\|concern = there is nothing to show that this "theorem" is [[WP:N\|notable]], or makes sense,~~ or ~~is more than something [[WP:NFT\|made up one day]] by the article author and his friend~~. ~~No [[WP:V\|source]] cited, none found.\|month = May\|day = 21\|year = 2009\|time = 16:56\|timestamp = 20090521165617}}~~		This article may be a hoax or unreliable.
	~~<!-- Do not use the "dated prod" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod\|reason" -->~~
	~~{{hoax}}~~
	== '''Feeling Reflection Theorem''' ==		== '''Feeling Reflection Theorem''' ==

wikademia>Wikademia: 9 revisions

2009-05-23T18:33:34Z

9 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:33, 23 May 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>AndrewHarbottle: /* Basketball Theory */

2009-05-22T09:40:23Z

Basketball Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:40, 22 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== '''Basketball Theory''' ==		== '''Basketball Theory''' ==

	The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[~~Samuel Comber~~]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.		The theory was coined by [[Dr. Sam Williams]] and [[Dr. Andrew Harbottle]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.

	Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.		Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.

wikademia>ClueBot: Reverting possible vandalism by 86.150.154.31 to version by Gwynnell. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot. (708433) (Bot)

2009-05-21T23:28:27Z

Reverting possible vandalism by 86.150.154.31 to version by Gwynnell. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot. (708433) (Bot)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 21 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== '''Basketball Theory''' ==		== '''Basketball Theory''' ==

	The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[~~Andrew Harbottle~~]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.		The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[Samuel Comber]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.

	Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.		Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.
Line 26:		Line 26:
	X - degree at which object is thrown		X - degree at which object is thrown
	Yp - power of throw multiplied by pie to accurately display its effectiveness when thrown through the air		Yp - power of throw multiplied by pie to accurately display its effectiveness when thrown through the air


	~~(we have tested this with several unbias experiments, and it really does work!!!)~~

86.150.154.31: /* Basketball Theory */

2009-05-21T23:28:23Z

Basketball Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:28, 21 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== '''Basketball Theory''' ==		== '''Basketball Theory''' ==

	The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[~~Samuel Comber~~]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.		The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[Andrew Harbottle]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.

	Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.		Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.
Line 26:		Line 26:
	X - degree at which object is thrown		X - degree at which object is thrown
	Yp - power of throw multiplied by pie to accurately display its effectiveness when thrown through the air		Yp - power of throw multiplied by pie to accurately display its effectiveness when thrown through the air


			(we have tested this with several unbias experiments, and it really does work!!!)

wikademia>Gwynnell at 22:50, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T22:50:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:50, 21 May 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== '''Basketball Theory''' ==		== '''Basketball Theory''' ==

	The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[~~Andrew Harbottle~~]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.		The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[Samuel Comber]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.

	Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.		Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.

wikademia>Gwynnell: /* Feeling Reflection Theorem */

2009-05-21T17:08:16Z

Feeling Reflection Theorem

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:08, 21 May 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	<math>S (ZE) eo = O</math>		<math>S (ZE) eo = O</math>

	S - ~~skill directly relating to outcome~~ (%)		S - Likelihood of finding Sasquatch (%)
	Z - energy before action (% of negative/positive E (see underneath))		Z - energy before action (% of negative/positive E (see underneath))
	E - type of energy		E - type of energy

wikademia>JohnCD: prod

2009-05-21T16:56:18Z

prod

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 21 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{dated prod\|concern = there is nothing to show that this "theorem" is [[WP:N\|notable]], or makes sense, or is more than something [[WP:NFT\|made up one day]] by the article author and his friend. No [[WP:V\|source]] cited, none found.\|month = May\|day = 21\|year = 2009\|time = 16:56\|timestamp = 20090521165617}}
			<!-- Do not use the "dated prod" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod\|reason" -->
	{{hoax}}		{{hoax}}
	== '''Feeling Reflection Theorem''' ==		== '''Feeling Reflection Theorem''' ==

wikademia>AndrewHarbottle: /* Basketball Theory */

2009-05-21T16:47:55Z

Basketball Theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:47, 21 May 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== '''Basketball Theory''' ==		== '''Basketball Theory''' ==

	The theory was coined by Sam Williams and Andrew Harbottle, and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.		The theory was coined by [[Sam Williams]] and [[Andrew Harbottle]], and proven using simple enactments of basketball; proclaiming that self belief is just as, if not more important, than technique and skill when attempting to score points in the game. They discussed that a game in which points were not being scored, and team morale was low, subjects performed less amiably when confidence was high. They also found that certain ritualistic techniques could be used, when believed in, to aid the overall outcome of a shot. For example, the rubbing of the balls exterior before throwing towards the hoop helped increase success, as did the gentle bouncing on the ground. It can be believed that showing signs of affection, or care towards the object increases positive energy, positive energy which directly influences the subjects belief that they are going to score a point. An increase in belief is an increase in concentration, and subjects were found to take a lot more care in their shots, perfecting their techniques and ultimately succeeding.

	Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.		Negative energy works in the opposite way as positive. It can be produced in a number of ways, mainly by an over determination to believe you will succeed I.e. arrogance, or forced confidence. Alternatively, a lack of confidence in general subtracts from the likelihood of success, and it works both ways. Therefore, the point at which self belief becomes useful and a hindrance is often unclear, though it is considered a positive thing if the subject displays a certain degree of modesty at all times, though this is unlikely, as continual success often results in arrogance developing. An over indulging of objects relieves it of it’s positive energy in interesting fashion. By kissing, or growing a close connection with the ball (for example) subjects lessened the chance of success. It could be argued that inanimate objects gain emotion or feeling towards others and dislike being parted by , this can be proven by the decreased success when these actions occur, and there was a significant difference when these actions ceased and normal play (without said interactions with the ball) resumed.

wikademia>JohnCD: hoax tag

2009-05-21T16:43:16Z

hoax tag

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:43, 21 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{hoax}}
	== '''Feeling Reflection Theorem''' ==		== '''Feeling Reflection Theorem''' ==