Humane Quality - Revision history

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - '[[Topic:' to '[['

2009-06-08T03:55:15Z

Text replace - '[[Topic:' to '[['

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:55, 8 June 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''		*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''

	[[~~Topic:~~User Interface]]s <small>[[~~Topic:~~User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[~~Topic:~~Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[~~Topic:~~Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].		[[User Interface]]s <small>[[User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

	In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], and are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].		In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], and are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

wikademia>Wikademia: Text replace - 'w:' to 'Wikipedia:'

2009-04-11T18:16:31Z

Text replace - 'w:' to 'Wikipedia:'

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 11 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)		The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[Wikipedia:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[Wikipedia:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[Wikipedia:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[Wikipedia:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)
	==Perspectives==		==Perspectives==
	From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].		From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[Wikipedia:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[Wikipedia:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].
	== Defying Reason ==		== Defying Reason ==
	Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:		Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:

wikademia>Wikademia: 8 revisions

2009-04-08T04:28:52Z

8 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:28, 8 April 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>Crochet.david.bot: Robot: Changing Category:Public Discourse

2008-10-29T15:38:32Z

Robot: Changing Category:Public Discourse

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 29 October 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].		[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

	In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], ~~[[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]]~~ and ~~[[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]]~~ are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].		In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], and are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

			[[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]]
			[[Category:Public discourse\|Public Discourse]]
	[[Category:Philosophy]]		[[Category:Philosophy]]
	[[Category:Humanities]]		[[Category:Humanities]]
	~~[[Category:Dialog]]~~
	~~[[Category:Public Discourse]]~~
	[[Category:Essays]]		[[Category:Essays]]

wikademia>CQ: Reverted edits by Zzuuzz (Talk) to last version by MaxSem using rollback

2007-04-26T12:37:26Z

Reverted edits by Zzuuzz (Talk) to last version by MaxSem using rollback

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, 26 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I like penis!~~		The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)
			==Perspectives==
			From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].
			== Defying Reason ==
			Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:
			*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''

			[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

			In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

			[[Category:Philosophy]]
			[[Category:Humanities]]
			[[Category:Dialog]]
			[[Category:Public Discourse]]
			[[Category:Essays]]

wikademia>Zzuuzz: Replacing page with 'I like penis!'

2007-04-26T12:18:34Z

Replacing page with 'I like penis!'

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:18, 26 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)		I like penis!
	~~==Perspectives==~~
	From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].
	~~== Defying Reason ==~~
	~~Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:~~
	*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''

	[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

	In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

	~~[[Category:Philosophy]]~~
	~~[[Category:Humanities]]~~
	~~[[Category:Dialog]]~~
	~~[[Category:Public Discourse]]~~
	~~[[Category:Essays]]~~

wikademia>MaxSem: Reverted edits by 3rd sock of Molag bal (Talk) to last version by Remi0o using rollback

2007-04-10T13:35:42Z

Reverted edits by 3rd sock of Molag bal (Talk) to last version by Remi0o using rollback

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:35, 10 April 2007
Line 1:	Line 1:
		The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)
		==Perspectives==
		From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].
		== Defying Reason ==
		Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:
		*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''

		[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

		In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

		[[Category:Philosophy]]
		[[Category:Humanities]]
		[[Category:Dialog]]
		[[Category:Public Discourse]]
		[[Category:Essays]]

wikademia>3rd sock of Molag bal: Removing all content from page

2007-04-10T13:06:45Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:06, 10 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)
	~~==Perspectives==~~
	From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].
	~~== Defying Reason ==~~
	~~Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:~~
	*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''

	[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

	In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

	~~[[Category:Philosophy]]~~
	~~[[Category:Humanities]]~~
	~~[[Category:Dialog]]~~
	~~[[Category:Public Discourse]]~~
	~~[[Category:Essays]]~~

wikademia>Remi0o at 01:12, 5 February 2007

2007-02-05T01:12:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 5 February 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].		In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

			[[Category:Philosophy]]
	[[Category:Humanities]]		[[Category:Humanities]]
	[[Category:Dialog]]		[[Category:Dialog]]
	[[Category:Public Discourse]]		[[Category:Public Discourse]]
	[[Category:Essays]]		[[Category:Essays]]

wikademia>CQ: Expanding...

2006-11-01T23:56:00Z

Expanding...

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 1 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[Quality]], in terms of the [[Human Condition]], and [[Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)		The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality\|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition\|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity\|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith\|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for – the [[evidence]] of things not seen)
			==Perspectives==
			From a [[Theology\|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog\|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance\|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason\|Defying Reason]].
			== Defying Reason ==
			Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:
			*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''

			[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism\|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic\|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics\|Ethical Dilimma]].

			In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities\|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog\|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse\|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays\|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers\|all]].

	[[Category:Humanities]]		[[Category:Humanities]]
	[[Category:Dialog]]		[[Category:Dialog]]
	[[Category:Public ~~Discource~~]]		[[Category:Public Discourse]]
			[[Category:Essays]]