North-wing politics - Revision history

wikademia>Wikademia at 08:05, 20 July 2009

2009-07-20T08:05:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:05, 20 July 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->~~
	<!-- The nomination page for this article already existed when this tag was added. If this was because the article had been nominated for deletion before, and you wish to renominate it, please replace "page=North-wing politics" with "page=North-wing politics (2nd nomination)" below before proceeding with the nomination.
	~~-->{{AfDM\|page=North-wing politics\|logdate=2009 June 13\|substed=yes }}~~
	~~<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull\|page=North-wing politics\|date=13 June 2009\|result='''keep'''}} -->~~
	~~<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->~~
	~~{{Orphan\|date=February 2009}}~~
	In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.		In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.

wikademia>Wikademia: 29 revisions

2009-06-14T21:10:15Z

29 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:10, 14 June 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>DanielRigal: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North-wing politics. (TW)

2009-06-13T16:15:18Z

Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North-wing politics. (TW)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 13 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
			<!-- The nomination page for this article already existed when this tag was added. If this was because the article had been nominated for deletion before, and you wish to renominate it, please replace "page=North-wing politics" with "page=North-wing politics (2nd nomination)" below before proceeding with the nomination.
			-->{{AfDM\|page=North-wing politics\|logdate=2009 June 13\|substed=yes }}
			<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull\|page=North-wing politics\|date=13 June 2009\|result='''keep'''}} -->
			<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
	{{Orphan\|date=February 2009}}		{{Orphan\|date=February 2009}}
	In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.		In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.

wikademia>Addbot: Bot: Adding Orphan Tag (Questions) (Report Errors)

2009-02-15T18:14:38Z

Bot: Adding Orphan Tag (Questions) (Report Errors)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:14, 15 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{Orphan\|date=February 2009}}
	In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.		In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.

wikademia>RL: /* The history of the Political Compass */ {{Fact|{{subst:DATE}}}}

2008-08-29T04:04:49Z

The history of the Political Compass: {{Fact|{{subst:DATE}}}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 29 August 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Hans Eysenck]] was first to create a multi-axis political model in his 1964 book "Sense and Nonsense in Psychology", though other multi-axis models have been developed including that by American [[David Nolan (Libertarian Party)\|David Nolan]] in 1970.		[[Hans Eysenck]] was first to create a multi-axis political model in his 1964 book "Sense and Nonsense in Psychology", though other multi-axis models have been developed including that by American [[David Nolan (Libertarian Party)\|David Nolan]] in 1970.

	The definition used here is based on the [[Political Compass]] created by [[Pace News Limited]], which expands on the Eysenck model and is widely accepted. There is also a [http://www.grassrootsforamerica.us/fertilizer/New-Political-Compass-Intro.shtml#New_Political_Compass New Political Compass TM] created by Paul Ray, and whilst he usefully labels the North "the New Progressives", the model is less internationally recognised outside of the US.		The definition used here is based on the [[Political Compass]] created by [[Pace News Limited]], which expands on the Eysenck model and is widely accepted.{{Fact\|date=August 2008}} There is also a [http://www.grassrootsforamerica.us/fertilizer/New-Political-Compass-Intro.shtml#New_Political_Compass New Political Compass TM] created by Paul Ray, and whilst he usefully labels the North "the New Progressives", the model is less internationally recognised outside of the US.

	==Additional references==		==Additional references==

wikademia>Everyme: rm link to same page

2008-07-05T07:32:38Z

rm link to same page

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 5 July 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In [[politics]], '''[[north-wing]]''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.		In [[politics]], '''north-wing''', '''the political north''', or simply northwing, are terms that refer to the segment of the [[political spectrum]] whose political attitudes occupy the north of a 360° [[Political Compass]], rather than the traditional left-right scale. The northern segment commonly represents collective authority, and social normality.

	In this [[multi-axis model]] the '''west-to-east''' line represents '''economic''' attitude. It retains some of its traditional left-to-right political meaning in terms of ''state'' versus ''private'' ownership. The '''north-to-south''' line represents '''social''' attitude and is respectively collective ''authority'' in the '''north''', and personal ''liberty'' in the '''south'''.		In this [[multi-axis model]] the '''west-to-east''' line represents '''economic''' attitude. It retains some of its traditional left-to-right political meaning in terms of ''state'' versus ''private'' ownership. The '''north-to-south''' line represents '''social''' attitude and is respectively collective ''authority'' in the '''north''', and personal ''liberty'' in the '''south'''.

wikademia>Open2universe: link repair (You can help!

2007-12-06T13:44:27Z

link repair (You can help!

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 6 December 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	In the new model, the classical inference of the left being ''progressive'' versus the right being ''reactionary'' is now redundant, as the [[Political Compass]] implies neither stance.		In the new model, the classical inference of the left being ''progressive'' versus the right being ''reactionary'' is now redundant, as the [[Political Compass]] implies neither stance.

	In ideological terms, where the compass is used to describe in the South-wing a political viewpoint that is [[relativist]], or [[post-modernist]], the north-wing of the compass is generally deemed to represent [[modernism]], [[neo-modernism]] or [[re-modernism]] in approach.		In ideological terms, where the compass is used to describe in the South-wing a political viewpoint that is [[relativist]], or [[post-modernist]], the north-wing of the compass is generally deemed to represent [[modernism]], [[Neomodernism\|neo-modernism]] or [[Remodernism\|re-modernism]] in approach.

	A '''north-wing''', or '''northwing''' position is the opposite of south-wing, which represents degrees of liberal [[individualism]], including at the extreme, [[Anarchism\|anarchy]].		A '''north-wing''', or '''northwing''' position is the opposite of south-wing, which represents degrees of liberal [[individualism]], including at the extreme, [[Anarchism\|anarchy]].

198.163.53.11 at 20:20, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T20:20:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 28 October 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Hans Eysenck]] was first to create a multi-axis political model in his 1964 book "Sense and Nonsense in Psychology", though other multi-axis models have been developed including that by American [[David Nolan (Libertarian Party)\|David Nolan]] in 1970.		[[Hans Eysenck]] was first to create a multi-axis political model in his 1964 book "Sense and Nonsense in Psychology", though other multi-axis models have been developed including that by American [[David Nolan (Libertarian Party)\|David Nolan]] in 1970.

	The definition used here is based on the [[Political Compass]] created by [~~http://www.politicalcompass.org/~~ Pace News Limited], which expands on the Eysenck model and is widely accepted. There is also a [http://www.grassrootsforamerica.us/fertilizer/New-Political-Compass-Intro.shtml#New_Political_Compass New Political Compass TM] created by Paul Ray, and whilst he usefully labels the North "the New Progressives", the model is less internationally recognised outside of the US.		The definition used here is based on the [[Political Compass]] created by [[Pace News Limited]], which expands on the Eysenck model and is widely accepted. There is also a [http://www.grassrootsforamerica.us/fertilizer/New-Political-Compass-Intro.shtml#New_Political_Compass New Political Compass TM] created by Paul Ray, and whilst he usefully labels the North "the New Progressives", the model is less internationally recognised outside of the US.

	==Additional references==		==Additional references==

wikademia>CmdrObot: Wikipedia URL→wikilink

2007-01-20T01:37:19Z

Wikipedia URL→wikilink

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 20 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	==The history of the Political Compass==		==The history of the Political Compass==

	[[Hans Eysenck]] was first to create a multi-axis political model in his 1964 book "Sense and Nonsense in Psychology", though other multi-axis models have been developed including that by American [~~http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nolan_%28Libertarian_Party%29~~ David Nolan] in 1970.		[[Hans Eysenck]] was first to create a multi-axis political model in his 1964 book "Sense and Nonsense in Psychology", though other multi-axis models have been developed including that by American [[David Nolan (Libertarian Party)\|David Nolan]] in 1970.

	The definition used here is based on the [[Political Compass]] created by [http://www.politicalcompass.org/ Pace News Limited], which expands on the Eysenck model and is widely accepted. There is also a [http://www.grassrootsforamerica.us/fertilizer/New-Political-Compass-Intro.shtml#New_Political_Compass New Political Compass TM] created by Paul Ray, and whilst he usefully labels the North "the New Progressives", the model is less internationally recognised outside of the US.		The definition used here is based on the [[Political Compass]] created by [http://www.politicalcompass.org/ Pace News Limited], which expands on the Eysenck model and is widely accepted. There is also a [http://www.grassrootsforamerica.us/fertilizer/New-Political-Compass-Intro.shtml#New_Political_Compass New Political Compass TM] created by Paul Ray, and whilst he usefully labels the North "the New Progressives", the model is less internationally recognised outside of the US.

81.174.245.61: /* Additional references */

2006-12-01T23:51:38Z

Additional references

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 1 December 2006
Line 19:		Line 19:
	[http://www.northwing.org/ Northwing.org], a British website describes the north-wing viewpoint thus:		[http://www.northwing.org/ Northwing.org], a British website describes the north-wing viewpoint thus:

	''"Liberal progressives who hold the centre ground of the compass, may have social attitudes that are in the 'North-wing' because they firmly believe in the concept of functional consensus and collective authority. When society becomes dysfunctional this more authoritative position is adopted to establish order, rather than being anti-liberal. Going with the flow of social change can mean the opposite of being progressive. There is nothing more reactionary than accepting the breakdown of communities or uncivilised behaviour as inevitable. Many north-wingers now perceive a 'reactionary left' ~~who hold post-modernist views and~~ who populate the south-wing of the political compass. North-wing can also therefore be seen as a reaction to South-wing, without being itself inherently reactionary."		''"Liberal progressives who hold the centre ground of the compass, may have social attitudes that are in the 'North-wing' because they firmly believe in the concept of functional consensus and collective authority. When society becomes dysfunctional this more authoritative position is adopted to establish order, rather than being anti-liberal. Going with the flow of social change can mean the opposite of being progressive. There is nothing more reactionary than accepting the breakdown of communities or uncivilised behaviour as inevitable. Many north-wingers now perceive a 'reactionary left' who populate the south-wing of the political compass. North-wing can also therefore be seen as a reaction to South-wing, without being itself inherently reactionary."
	''		''