Pipeline selection - Revision history

wikademia>Wikademia at 20:41, 11 April 2009

2009-04-11T20:41:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 11 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\| [[Charter for alignment\|Charter for Alignment]]		\| [[Charter for alignment\|Charter for Alignment]]
	\|}		\|}


	[[Category:(Anti-)Behaviors of business process management program governance]]		[[Category:(Anti-)Behaviors of business process management program governance]]
			{{ntnes}}

wikademia>Wikademia: 3 revisions

2009-04-11T05:54:28Z

3 revisions

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:54, 11 April 2009
(No difference)

wikademia>Chungw: added category

2009-04-10T21:54:35Z

added category

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 10 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\| [[Charter for alignment\|Charter for Alignment]]		\| [[Charter for alignment\|Charter for Alignment]]
	\|}		\|}


			[[Category:(Anti-)Behaviors of business process management program governance]]

wikademia>Chungw: added navigation to parent charter

2009-04-10T19:03:48Z

added navigation to parent charter

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:03, 10 April 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Once underway, the projects are evaluated on a regular basis. Specific, production-realized, results are then required every three to four months with releases to the end-users. The projects themselves last several releases, but the end-users and the organizations see tangible benefit throughout.		Once underway, the projects are evaluated on a regular basis. Specific, production-realized, results are then required every three to four months with releases to the end-users. The projects themselves last several releases, but the end-users and the organizations see tangible benefit throughout.


			== Applies to ==
			{\|
			\| [[Image:Alignment.gif\|left\|link=Charter for alignment]]
			\| [[Charter for alignment\|Charter for Alignment]]
			\|}

wikademia>Chungw: Initial behavior page

2009-04-10T16:07:45Z

Initial behavior page

New page

== Summary ==
Opportunities at some organizations are evaluated with a standardized framework for selection. With limited resources to meet the demand of all possible projects, these organizations pick opportunities based on defined criteria. These criteria include costs, benefits, and the time to realization or delivery.

All opportunities are presented for selection with similar highlights, making comparison easier. The strategic objectives are enumerated and ranked. Problem statements at the process level are identified along with possible solutions. The costs for each approach and the cumulative effect are captured, and then the aggregate report is submitted for consideration.

Once underway, the projects are evaluated on a regular basis. Specific, production-realized, results are then required every three to four months with releases to the end-users. The projects themselves last several releases, but the end-users and the organizations see tangible benefit throughout.