Jump to content

Archive:Advanced ANOVA/One-way ANOVA: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>Jtneill
wikademia>Wikademia
 
(34 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This tutorial focuses on '''one-way ANOVA'''.
{{Ntnes}}
This tutorial teaches use of '''one-way ANOVA''', a statistical technique for testing mean differences betweeen three or more independent groups on a single dependent variable. Practical exercises are based on using [[SPSS]].
{{RoundBoxBottom}}
==Purpose==
* Assesses the statistical significance of differences between three or more group means for a single dependent variable
* Extension of a ''t''-test
** Use one-way ANOVA in preference to multiple pairwise comparisons (''t''-tests) because:
*** Computationally easier
*** Limits the probability of [[type I and type II errors]].
**** With multiple comparisons, if they are all independent (which is unlikley) in a series of 100 tests we would expct to get five Type I errors with a .05 level of significance
**** By simultaneously computing all possible comparisons in a single significance test, the ANOVA avoids these inflated error rates
** However, use of one-way ANOVA limits error rates at the expense of specificity - statistic tells us that there is a significant difference somewhere among the sample means, but does not tell us which means differ significantly (have to use post-hoc and a priori comparison procedures)


==Introduction==
==Examples==
* Unit outline (updated - to upload/link)
* Experimental study: Examine reaction time under different levels of alcohol consumption by randomly assigning participants to four conditions (none, low, medium, and high alcohol)
* [[../Assessment/]]
* Quasi-experimental study: Examine whether students with behaviour problems behave better in classrooms where teachers have a humanistic philosophy and have control of their classrooms. Classify teachers as (1) humanists with control, (2) strict disciplinarians, and (3) laissez-faire.


==General steps==
==General steps==
# Establish hypothesis/hypotheses
# Establish [[hypothesis|hypothesis/hypotheses]]
# Identify IV (categorical; between-subjects) and DV (at least interval)
# Examine [[../Assumptions|assumptions]] - If assumptions are not met, use the [[Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric procedure]]
# Examine assumptions:
# Examine [[descriptive statistics]], particularly the four moments (''M'', ''SD'', [[Skewness]], [[Kurtosis]]) overall, and also for each group
#* The data in each cell is normally distributed
# Examine [[graphs]], e.g.,:
#* Homogeneity of variance (the variance in each cell is similar)
#* Histograms
#* Cells are independent
#* Normal probability plot
# Create descriptive statistics
# Possible graphs:
#* Bar graph
#* Box and whisker
#* Error-bar graph
#* Error-bar graph
# Conduct inferential test and interpret significance
# Conduct inferential test (ANOVA) and interpret significance of ''F''
# Conduct planned contrasts of post-hoc tests if ''F'' is significant
# Conduct follow-up tests (planned contrasts or post-hoc tests) if ''F'' is significant
# Interpret effect sizes (later in this tutorial)
# Calculate and interpret effect sizes
#* Eta-square (omnibus - equivalent to ''R''<sup>2</sup>)
#* Eta-square (omnibus - equivalent to ''R''<sup>2</sup>)
#* Standardised mean effect size (difference b/w two means)
#* Standardised mean effect size (difference b/w two means) - e.g., [[Cohen's d|Cohen's ''d'']]


==Visual ANOVA==
==Visual ANOVA==
Line 30: Line 37:


==Error bar graphs==
==Error bar graphs==
[[Image:Pulse_Rate_Error_Bar_By_Exercise_Level.png|thumb|right|500px|Error-bar graph showing mean pulse rates and 95% confidence intervals by exercise level.]]
* Use any dataset
* Use any dataset
* Conduct a one-way ANOVA and graphically present the means and confidence intervals using an Error Bar Graph - is this error bar chart consistent with the statistical results? Why? Why not?
* Conduct a one-way ANOVA and graphically present the means and confidence intervals using an Error Bar Graph - is this error bar chart consistent with the statistical results?
** Why?
** Why not?
 
==Data==
# [http://www.pearsoned.com.au/wpsBridge/francis5/files/AQUES.sav AQUES.sav]
# [http://www.pearsoned.com.au/wpsBridge/francis5/files/motiv.sav Motiv.sav]


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Analysis of variance/Data analysis tutorial]]
* [[Analysis of variance]]
* [[One-way ANOVA]]
 
==External links==
* [http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/display/RMPE/ANOVA ANOVA] (ucspace)
** [http://ucspace.canberra.edu.au/download/attachments/45090852/ANOVA+Writeup1.doc One-way ANOVA example writeup]


[[Category:Research methods and professional ethics]]
[[Category:{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]

Latest revision as of 05:49, 27 May 2009

This tutorial teaches use of one-way ANOVA, a statistical technique for testing mean differences betweeen three or more independent groups on a single dependent variable. Practical exercises are based on using SPSS. |}

Purpose

  • Assesses the statistical significance of differences between three or more group means for a single dependent variable
  • Extension of a t-test
    • Use one-way ANOVA in preference to multiple pairwise comparisons (t-tests) because:
      • Computationally easier
      • Limits the probability of type I and type II errors.
        • With multiple comparisons, if they are all independent (which is unlikley) in a series of 100 tests we would expct to get five Type I errors with a .05 level of significance
        • By simultaneously computing all possible comparisons in a single significance test, the ANOVA avoids these inflated error rates
    • However, use of one-way ANOVA limits error rates at the expense of specificity - statistic tells us that there is a significant difference somewhere among the sample means, but does not tell us which means differ significantly (have to use post-hoc and a priori comparison procedures)

Examples

  • Experimental study: Examine reaction time under different levels of alcohol consumption by randomly assigning participants to four conditions (none, low, medium, and high alcohol)
  • Quasi-experimental study: Examine whether students with behaviour problems behave better in classrooms where teachers have a humanistic philosophy and have control of their classrooms. Classify teachers as (1) humanists with control, (2) strict disciplinarians, and (3) laissez-faire.

General steps

  1. Establish hypothesis/hypotheses
  2. Examine [[../Assumptions|assumptions]] - If assumptions are not met, use the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric procedure
  3. Examine descriptive statistics, particularly the four moments (M, SD, Skewness, Kurtosis) overall, and also for each group
  4. Examine graphs, e.g.,:
    • Histograms
    • Normal probability plot
    • Error-bar graph
  5. Conduct inferential test (ANOVA) and interpret significance of F
  6. Conduct follow-up tests (planned contrasts or post-hoc tests) if F is significant
  7. Calculate and interpret effect sizes
    • Eta-square (omnibus - equivalent to R2)
    • Standardised mean effect size (difference b/w two means) - e.g., Cohen's d

Visual ANOVA

Error bar graphs

Error-bar graph showing mean pulse rates and 95% confidence intervals by exercise level.
  • Use any dataset
  • Conduct a one-way ANOVA and graphically present the means and confidence intervals using an Error Bar Graph - is this error bar chart consistent with the statistical results?
    • Why?
    • Why not?

Data

  1. AQUES.sav
  2. Motiv.sav

See also