Jump to content

Load-bearing body armor: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>John Bessa
wikademia>Eme
mNo edit summary
 
(73 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:Rattlesnake_b_n_w.jpg|250px|right|Join or die]]Steps involved in fighting are registering an attack, self=protection from incoming fire, preparing and positioning weapons, returning fire, and finally chasing the enemy when they start feeling the return firepower.


The scope of this writing probably cannot include body armor research and still focus on load-bearing development.
*Under these conditions, a soldier might want to unload unnecessary gear such as sleeping gear and food, but will want to keep ammunition clipped on for returning fire, and may need other supplies such as water, and first aid.


As this article is in its early stage, and since most of the material is being presented by a single writing, there is no reason not to present it in the first person.
* This implies two layers, a "permanent" layer with the ammo that might also include body armor, and the less critical layer with supplies.


=Pack design=
* The load-bearing component of a military pack system has to be body armor.  Weapons, water, ammo, and short rations need to clip to that, and the load bearing body armor components need to conform closely to the body, like an exoskeleton, to properly distribute the weight.  It also needs to extend the original ALICE system so that the loads can be carried w/o the body armor.
 
* The pack itself with long-term supplies has to clip to the body armor with quick release clips at the shoulders and the small of the back where weight is transferred to the body armor.
 
=Pack designs=


==Frame pack==
==Frame pack==
*Hip belt transfers the weight to the front
*Frame transfers the weight downwards to the hip belt
*Straps hold the frame to the back
'''Advantages'''
*Weight is transferred to where it is best supported
*Frame acts as a column to support weight
*Pack load can extend upwards where carrying is most efficient
*Straps or mesh across the back allow for air circulation
*Sacks or bulky objects can be lashed or strapped to the frame


==Rucksack==
==Rucksack==
*Weight pulls downwards from the straps
'''Advantages'''
*Low center of gravity
*Easy to organize


==Tube pack==
==Tube pack==


=Weight distribution=
*Bag is tube-shaped, or "D-shaped"
*Structure can be a stiff foam sleeping pad the circumference of the bag
*Weight is divided between straps and belt
*With a small load, the pack resembles a rucksack where the top is folded inwards.
*The sack can be increased in height above where the straps meet and connect to the bag
*Side pockets can be added
 
'''Advantages'''
 
*Physical maneuverability of a rucksack
*Extensible from small to large
*Light weight as it uses existing equipment for structure
*Unbreakable


==Shoulders==
=Weight-bearing Components=


==Back==
*Shoulder straps
*Hip belt


==Hips==
=Weight distribution=


==Combined distribution==
*Shoulders
*Back
*Hips
*Combined distribution


=Layers=
=Layers=
These parallel the ALICE design, which uses a commonly accepted load-bearing strategies [http://ohiovalleyoutfitters.com/wordpress/?p=96]


==Short (inner layer)==
==Short (inner layer)==
'''Fighting and survival equipment'''
*Weapon
*Weapon
*Annunciation
*Ammunition
*Water
*Water
*Short rations
*Short rations
*First aid
*First aid
*Radio communication
*Radio communication
*Compass and maps


==Long (outer layer)==
==Long (outer layer)==
*Supplies
'''Supplies'''
*Tent
*Tent
*Sleeping bag
*Sleeping bag
*long rations
*Long rations
*medical supplies
*Medical supplies
*More Ammunition


==Connectors==
==Outer layer connectors==
 
The sack needs at most four quick-release connectors and possibly only three to connect to the body armor, or the short layer.


===Shoulders===
===Shoulders===


===Small of back===
Straps, if continued along their vector, meet just below the should blades.  In strap designs where the straps meet at a central location, often attaching to a ring, the top of the pack is pulled forward with straps that meet the should straps over or just in front of the shoulder.
 
===Back triangle===
 
This is the area below the small of the back where the hips meet the back.  In the back, this area is called the sacrum, but since the load is distributed across the entire area, and the term "triangle" is appropriate.
 
==Development and body armor simulation==
 
The LBBA model, through vector analysis, seems to support a solid-body, perhaps "old school," version of armor, as the weight from the pack, or correctly, the sack, pulls (or pushes):
 
* Downwards to the "triangle" just below the small of the back
* Backwards from the shoulders
* Downwards and backwards on the muscle in front of the hips.
 
The ideal body armor is for distributing weight purely equally is solid, and it seems that a single piece model would provide both the most protection.
 
It should be noted that the frame-pack model does not necessarily have to distribute weight equally, as its load distribution can be optionally shifted between the shoulders and the hip belt.
 
The frame pack model also allows air circulation, which would be a challenge to provide for this single piece armor model.


=Background Material=
The single-piece body model has been well-developed for the curing of extreme injuries to the back, and these kinds of body braces are available for every body type.  It seems that they could easily be modified for this development, and the molds could probably be adapted for actual body armor manufacturing.  As an advantage, this kind of armor would be specifically peace-keeping in nature, as it only benefits load-bearing soldiers, and will probably have no benefit for para-militaries or criminal enforcers.


Note: all the material below is temporarily quoted from various websites under fair use and stands as unverified reference material only.  The Interceptor page is from the Wikipedia.
[http://thinman.com/LBBA/ls.php Here is a page of images] collected from the web (that are outside of this wiki's scope) that show the practicality of using existing medical technology for modeling LBBA, and possibly producing single piece "old school" body armor from this existing technology.


==Webs==
==Single-piece body armor design challenges==
Anyone who has high or low-crawled with a loosely fitted web belt (even when attached to a harness) can validate that web belt attachments automatically head for the groin area [http://westernrifleshooters.blogspot.com/2009/01/spartacus-thoughts-on-load-bearing.html]
Another design challenge is so obvious as to be ignored: how does a soldier put on a unified piece of body armor?  The answer may lie in the back brace technology, or may be influenced by the weight vectors created by the outer layer, the sack.  The inner layer design is less complicated, either relying on clips or straps to attach "short" items. The inner layer is still significant as it is the fighting, and not carrying, layer. Item location will influence the soldiers' fighting abilities.


==Armor plates==
The best design strategy may be to attempt to reach all the benefits of the frame pack, which include load type flexibility, air circulation, and load adjustment between lower and upper body through the "column."
7.62mm proof ceramic plates [http://www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/1-1778.aspx]


==Choices==
Since the underlying model is the traditional ALICE design, then it may make sense to create a parallel pack design that replaces the body armor for safer environments, and perhaps training.  This parallel equipment may also create a civilian market.


RACK or Blackhawk/Tactical Tailor/etc clones thereof, which is basically a MOLLE compatible version of British assault chest rigs and, in turn, a derivative of the venerable Warsaw Pact/3rd World AK chest harness "apron." [http://www.strategypage.com/militaryforums/1-1778.aspx]


I find ALICE more comfortable than MOLLE and PAL vests. I'm a pretty short guy so vest never fitted me right. [http://www.military-quotes.com/forum/load-bearing-equipment-t26562.html]
[[File:My_alice_pack.JPG|right|thumb]]  


==Load Bearing Equipment==
==My ALICE pack==
===Belt===
It consists of a belt (usually a stiff pistol belt), and a set of suspenders. Pouches are then connected to the belt, and the rest of your gear is then stored in those pouches.


===The Load Bearing Vest===
In 1984, I joined a nearly comical yet heroic journey around the United States called the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wkreth/Stick_Against_Stone#Rock_Against_Reagan_Tour_-_1983 Rock Against Racism Tour], where Racism was sometimes Reagan. On a school bus I found a mail bag filled with the radical paper, the Yipster Times, and I put my tools in it. A year later I found an ALICE suspender set in a dump in Woodstock, NY, and attached it to the mail bag.  I have been using the pack continously since then, as no rucksack I can find is more practical.  I used to to recycle discarded computers while riding my bicycle all through the 1990s, as it was "bag enough" for AT-sized computers, which were big and heavy.
The second level, is really meant as a replacement for the LBE. The advantages are that it usually has more pockets on the front of the vest to store items, and also still has the belt to which pouches can be affixed. The problem is that in hot climates, the vest can be uncomfortable - not to mention make you look like someone who wants to play "tacti-cool" airsoft. It may also make it hard to lay in a prone position if your pockets are stuffed full. But, barring the bad stuff, the LBV is very good at carrying gear.


===Rucksack===
The advantages of it were also that it does not cause perspiration to form on the back (more important in cold than hot because perspiration in cold causes hypothermia), comfort, and a low center of gravity.
The third level, the rucksack - is your main backpack. There are many types available, but for those who want to enjoy the wilderness on a tight budget, I would recommend the military ALICE pack. It is fairly inexpensive and is nearly indestructible. The ruck should be able to be worn comfortably over either an LBE or an LBV. Just a tip, if you do purchase an alice pack, be sure to add some extra padding to to the shoulders and kidney area, you will thank me later.
http://ohiovalleyoutfitters.com/wordpress/?p=96


==[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interceptor_Body_Armor Interceptor body armor]==
==See also==


Due to the increased dangers of improvised explosive devices, a newer versions of the vital plates and components have been developed. the Enhanced Small Arms Protective Inserts (ESAPIs) and Enhance Side Ballistic Inserts (ESBIs) have become available, along with the Deltoid and Axillary Protectors (DAPs). These new systems are becoming the standard for forward deployed troops in OEF and OIF. The E-SAPI plates are thicker and heavier than the normal SAPIs, but they offer increased protection from 7.62mm M2 armor piercing ammunition. The ESBIs is an attachable MOLLE ballistic pannel with a pouch for a 8x6 side-SAPI, for protection of the side of the torso/under the arm. DAPs consists of two ambidextrous modular components, the Deltoid (upper arm) Protector and the Axillary (under arm) Protector, and provide for additional protection from fragmentary and projectiles to the upper arm and underarm areas. With the Interceptor body armor, E-SAPI plates (10.9 lb), ESBIs (7.75 lb), DAPs (5.03 lb) and with the neck, throat and groin protectors installed the armor is significantly heavier at 33.11 pounds (15.01 kg) A combat load of ammunition and first aid kit are almost universally attached to the webbing on the vest, adding even more mass.
[[User:John_Bessa/Form_Car |Form car]]
This extends the idea of combining protection from explosives in a vehicle design with another advantage as the LBBA does. Bottom protection for a vehicle can be used also to create waterproofness, and hence an amphibian.


lightly-equipped insurgents with U.S. troops routinely burdened with upwards of 60 lbs. of weapons, ammunition, armor, food, water, and other assorted equipment. Many troops have complained that under such conditions, they are simply unable to pursue their guerrilla opponents. Troops who primarily ride in vehicles generally want the highest practical level of protection from IED's and ambushes, while dismounted infantry often make the case that impaired mobility can prove just as fatal to them as inadequate armor.
[[Category:Body armor]]
[[Category:Armor]]

Latest revision as of 06:10, 17 June 2014

Join or die
Join or die

Steps involved in fighting are registering an attack, self=protection from incoming fire, preparing and positioning weapons, returning fire, and finally chasing the enemy when they start feeling the return firepower.

  • Under these conditions, a soldier might want to unload unnecessary gear such as sleeping gear and food, but will want to keep ammunition clipped on for returning fire, and may need other supplies such as water, and first aid.
  • This implies two layers, a "permanent" layer with the ammo that might also include body armor, and the less critical layer with supplies.
  • The load-bearing component of a military pack system has to be body armor. Weapons, water, ammo, and short rations need to clip to that, and the load bearing body armor components need to conform closely to the body, like an exoskeleton, to properly distribute the weight. It also needs to extend the original ALICE system so that the loads can be carried w/o the body armor.
  • The pack itself with long-term supplies has to clip to the body armor with quick release clips at the shoulders and the small of the back where weight is transferred to the body armor.

Pack designs

Frame pack

  • Hip belt transfers the weight to the front
  • Frame transfers the weight downwards to the hip belt
  • Straps hold the frame to the back

Advantages

  • Weight is transferred to where it is best supported
  • Frame acts as a column to support weight
  • Pack load can extend upwards where carrying is most efficient
  • Straps or mesh across the back allow for air circulation
  • Sacks or bulky objects can be lashed or strapped to the frame

Rucksack

  • Weight pulls downwards from the straps

Advantages

  • Low center of gravity
  • Easy to organize

Tube pack

  • Bag is tube-shaped, or "D-shaped"
  • Structure can be a stiff foam sleeping pad the circumference of the bag
  • Weight is divided between straps and belt
  • With a small load, the pack resembles a rucksack where the top is folded inwards.
  • The sack can be increased in height above where the straps meet and connect to the bag
  • Side pockets can be added

Advantages

  • Physical maneuverability of a rucksack
  • Extensible from small to large
  • Light weight as it uses existing equipment for structure
  • Unbreakable

Weight-bearing Components

  • Shoulder straps
  • Hip belt

Weight distribution

  • Shoulders
  • Back
  • Hips
  • Combined distribution

Layers

These parallel the ALICE design, which uses a commonly accepted load-bearing strategies [1]

Short (inner layer)

Fighting and survival equipment

  • Weapon
  • Ammunition
  • Water
  • Short rations
  • First aid
  • Radio communication
  • Compass and maps

Long (outer layer)

Supplies

  • Tent
  • Sleeping bag
  • Long rations
  • Medical supplies
  • More Ammunition

Outer layer connectors

The sack needs at most four quick-release connectors and possibly only three to connect to the body armor, or the short layer.

Shoulders

Straps, if continued along their vector, meet just below the should blades. In strap designs where the straps meet at a central location, often attaching to a ring, the top of the pack is pulled forward with straps that meet the should straps over or just in front of the shoulder.

Back triangle

This is the area below the small of the back where the hips meet the back. In the back, this area is called the sacrum, but since the load is distributed across the entire area, and the term "triangle" is appropriate.

Development and body armor simulation

The LBBA model, through vector analysis, seems to support a solid-body, perhaps "old school," version of armor, as the weight from the pack, or correctly, the sack, pulls (or pushes):

  • Downwards to the "triangle" just below the small of the back
  • Backwards from the shoulders
  • Downwards and backwards on the muscle in front of the hips.

The ideal body armor is for distributing weight purely equally is solid, and it seems that a single piece model would provide both the most protection.

It should be noted that the frame-pack model does not necessarily have to distribute weight equally, as its load distribution can be optionally shifted between the shoulders and the hip belt.

The frame pack model also allows air circulation, which would be a challenge to provide for this single piece armor model.

The single-piece body model has been well-developed for the curing of extreme injuries to the back, and these kinds of body braces are available for every body type. It seems that they could easily be modified for this development, and the molds could probably be adapted for actual body armor manufacturing. As an advantage, this kind of armor would be specifically peace-keeping in nature, as it only benefits load-bearing soldiers, and will probably have no benefit for para-militaries or criminal enforcers.

Here is a page of images collected from the web (that are outside of this wiki's scope) that show the practicality of using existing medical technology for modeling LBBA, and possibly producing single piece "old school" body armor from this existing technology.

Single-piece body armor design challenges

Another design challenge is so obvious as to be ignored: how does a soldier put on a unified piece of body armor? The answer may lie in the back brace technology, or may be influenced by the weight vectors created by the outer layer, the sack. The inner layer design is less complicated, either relying on clips or straps to attach "short" items. The inner layer is still significant as it is the fighting, and not carrying, layer. Item location will influence the soldiers' fighting abilities.

The best design strategy may be to attempt to reach all the benefits of the frame pack, which include load type flexibility, air circulation, and load adjustment between lower and upper body through the "column."

Since the underlying model is the traditional ALICE design, then it may make sense to create a parallel pack design that replaces the body armor for safer environments, and perhaps training. This parallel equipment may also create a civilian market.


My ALICE pack

In 1984, I joined a nearly comical yet heroic journey around the United States called the Rock Against Racism Tour, where Racism was sometimes Reagan. On a school bus I found a mail bag filled with the radical paper, the Yipster Times, and I put my tools in it. A year later I found an ALICE suspender set in a dump in Woodstock, NY, and attached it to the mail bag. I have been using the pack continously since then, as no rucksack I can find is more practical. I used to to recycle discarded computers while riding my bicycle all through the 1990s, as it was "bag enough" for AT-sized computers, which were big and heavy.

The advantages of it were also that it does not cause perspiration to form on the back (more important in cold than hot because perspiration in cold causes hypothermia), comfort, and a low center of gravity.

See also

Form car This extends the idea of combining protection from explosives in a vehicle design with another advantage as the LBBA does. Bottom protection for a vehicle can be used also to create waterproofness, and hence an amphibian.