Why FLOSS in Science: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Ktucker No edit summary |
wikademia>Wikademia No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* [http://sciencecommons.org/ Science Commons]. | * [http://sciencecommons.org/ Science Commons]. | ||
==Reference== | |||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:Research (FLOSS)]] | |||
Latest revision as of 03:15, 10 May 2009
For now, we list links and readings ... towards a full motivation .... A good exercise for learners would be to write an essay on this topic, and add a link to it here.
Learning activity: discuss why FLOSS should be used in science.
Transparency, replicability, verifiability, ....
- Open science, open access and open source software at Open Medicine[1].
- On the complexities of sharing scientific data.
- Science Commons.
Reference
- ↑ Murray S, S Choi, J Hoey, C Kendall, J Maskalyk, and A Palepu. 2008. Open Medicine, 2 (1). http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewArticle/205/104 accessed on 21 July 2008.