Jump to content

Archive:Social impact theory: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>Jeanaashleigh
←Created page with '== Social Impact Theory == Social impact theory-a thoery that states the likelihood that you will respond to social influence depending upon three variables: <b...'
 
wikademia>Wikademia
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Social Impact Theory ==
{{ntnes}}
[[Social impact theory]]-a thoery that states the likelihood that you will respond to social influence depending upon three variables:
'''Social impact theory''' predicts that as strength and immediacy increase within a group, conformity will also increase. The more important a group is and the more one is in its presence, the more likely it is for one to conform to the group's normative pressures.  
<br />1. Strength: How important the influncing group is to you.
<br />2. Immediacy: How close the group is to you (whether in space or time) during the attempt to influence you.
<br />3. Number: How many people are in the group.  


As the size of a group increases a single person has less of an effect. Thus, if one feels pressure from a group to conform, adding another person to the minority makes a much greater difference to a small group as opposed to a large group.


== Inroduction ==
[[Bibb Latané]], a professor at the [[University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill]], published the theory in 1981. Latané constructed a mathematical model of the effects of strength, immediacy, and number. He applied this formula to the results of several conformity studies and it accurately predicted the actual amount of conformity that occurred within groups.
The social impact theory predicts that as strength and immediacy increase within a group comformity will also increase. The more improtant a group is and the more one is in its presence the more likely it is for one to conform to the groups normative pressures.
<br />As the size of a group increases a single person has less of an effect. Thus, if one feels pressure from a group to conform, adding another person to the minority makes a much greater difference to a small group as opposed to a large group.
 
== History ==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibb_Latane Bibb Latane], an accomplished professor at the university of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, published the social impact theory in 1981.  
 


== Examples ==
== Examples ==
* Gay men living in communities highly involved in [[AIDS]] awareness activities report feeling more social pressure to avoid risky sexual behavior then gay men who live in less involved communities.
* Heterosexual college students reported that the likelihood in engaging in risky sexual behavior was determined by the norms for sexual behavior in their groups of friends.


==See also==
* [[Social impact theory/References|References]]


 
[[Category:Social psychology]]
== Uses ==
[[Category:Sociological theories]]
 
 
 
== Reference ==

Latest revision as of 17:44, 8 June 2009

Social impact theory predicts that as strength and immediacy increase within a group, conformity will also increase. The more important a group is and the more one is in its presence, the more likely it is for one to conform to the group's normative pressures.

As the size of a group increases a single person has less of an effect. Thus, if one feels pressure from a group to conform, adding another person to the minority makes a much greater difference to a small group as opposed to a large group.

Bibb Latané, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, published the theory in 1981. Latané constructed a mathematical model of the effects of strength, immediacy, and number. He applied this formula to the results of several conformity studies and it accurately predicted the actual amount of conformity that occurred within groups.

Examples

  • Gay men living in communities highly involved in AIDS awareness activities report feeling more social pressure to avoid risky sexual behavior then gay men who live in less involved communities.
  • Heterosexual college students reported that the likelihood in engaging in risky sexual behavior was determined by the norms for sexual behavior in their groups of friends.

See also