User:Wikademia/Discuss

Please quit spouting nonsense on Wikipedia Review. As a reader of that board, I ask you to please stop propagating your annoying, incoherent rambling. This includes the repetition of emoticons and attempts at humor which do not contribute to criticism of Wikipedia and its administrators' actions. It makes the board incomprehensible and hard to read, and is considered a form of flooding. Whilst I am banned from the boards, it is obvious that the frequent posters to the board are irked by your posts. In addition, it blocks new posts relating to the topic of WP criticism from being seen, replaced instead by your "writing". To put it bluntly, the majority of WR (who I am not trying to speak for; just read the responses to your posts) does not appreciate your drivel. Everything you have posted within the last 4 months belongs in the lounge.

Jonas Rand 05:38, August 10, 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. If you would like to contribute here constructively, you are welcome to. Dr. Eme

You don't like smile-y faces???????????????????????????? awwwwwwwwww Dr. Eme

No, and nor do most of WR. Although it's changed very much since I was jdrand (mid-late 2007), they still don't like pointless emoticons and whole lines full of repeated letters, somewhat like the above. The readership is seeming to get tired of your antics. Jonas Rand 06:12, August 10, 2009 (UTC)

OK. Thank you for the feedback. What about sullen faces? Are sullen faces better? Dr. Eme

No. If you would post content and commentary, without emoticons or repetition of letters, that would be fine. Well, you can post one emoticon, but I think that should be all. Jonas Rand 06:22, August 10, 2009 (UTC)

OK. Thank you for the feedback. I hope Wikademia can be helpful to you in your life. Dr. Eme

So will you stop spamming the board with puerile nonsense, or go to Wikipedia and just leave altogether? It seems pretty obvious that continuing your current behavior will not get you many friends there, because most WR members know that you are spouting irrelevant material which is unrelated to criticizing Wikipedia. You were a steward on some project, like Wikiversity or something, and never took a stand against anything. You were all over the wiki system and you loved it. You were not a serious critic, and don't seem to have improved at all. So either produce some constructive, sensible criticism, or go back to playing wiki games. Jonas Rand 06:37, August 10, 2009 (UTC)

Are you alright? Did mean "reviewing" not "criticizing"? You've not been able to decipher my constructive criticism? It is not comprehensible to you? Dr. Eme

Oh, I just saw your last post. Good start, please continue in this way. This didn't belong in the Lounge. I'm going to bed. Jonas Rand 06:46, August 10, 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I must be off my game tonight. Have a nice sleep and dreams and all that. Dr. Eme