Jump to content

Open design cars: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>Erkan Yilmaz
:intended was: can be open, but must not be. --~~~~
wikademia>Wikademia
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
why is there no need to be open? [[User:Dr. Eme|Dr. Eme]]
why is there no need to be open? [[User:Dr. Eme|Dr. Eme]]
:intended was: can be open, but must not be. --[[User:Erkan Yilmaz|Erkan Yilmaz]] 06:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
:intended was: can be open, but must not be. --[[User:Erkan Yilmaz|Erkan Yilmaz]] 06:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
==Working specifications==
* 4 wheels
* 4 seats
* Locks
* A trunk
* An engine
* A frame
* Paint
* Windows
* Muffler
===Others===
* Good control
* Safe
* Good braking
* Can go reasonable fast
* Aesthetically pleasing
==See also==
* [[Automotive engineering]]
* [[Open design]]


[[Category:Design]]
[[Category:Design]]
[[Category:Open design]]
[[Category:Open design]]
[[Category:Automotive engineering]]
[[Category:Automotive engineering]]

Latest revision as of 21:22, 5 November 2009

They've got to look cool. They got to be fast. They got to be efficient.

No labels unless people want brand labels.

Flex fuel capable. Perhaps some battery models....

no need to be open :-)

why is there no need to be open? Dr. Eme

intended was: can be open, but must not be. --Erkan Yilmaz 06:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Working specifications

  • 4 wheels
  • 4 seats
  • Locks
  • A trunk
  • An engine
  • A frame
  • Paint
  • Windows
  • Muffler

Others

  • Good control
  • Safe
  • Good braking
  • Can go reasonable fast
  • Aesthetically pleasing

See also