|
|
| (317 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{refimprove|date=June 2008}}
| | "'''Somebody else's problem'''" or "'''someone else's problem'''" is an issue which is dismissed by a person on the grounds that they consider somebody else to be responsible for it. |
| {{unencyclopedic|date=June 2008}}
| |
| '''Somebody Else's Problem''' (also known as ''Someone else's problem'' or ''SEP'') is an effect that causes people to ignore matters which are generally important to a group but may not seem specifically important to the individual. Author [[Douglas Adams]] description of the effect, which he ascribed to a physical "SEP field", has helped to make it a generally recognised phenomenon. The label is now widely used to focus public attention on matters that may have been overlooked. | |
|
| |
|
| ==SEP and Psychology== | | ==Examples== |
| [[Richard Dawkins]] argued in [[The_Selfish_Gene#Many_phenomena_explained|The Selfish Gene]] that organisms can act [[Altruism|altruistically]] (against their individual interests) to help related organisms reproduce. In this sense recognition of possible threats to the group is an important survival trait.
| |
|
| |
|
| Various areas of [[Psychology]] and [[Philosophy of perception]] are concerned with the reasons why individuals often ignore such matters. [[Optimism bias]] tends to reduce the subjective importance of some matters. Where multiple individuals personally experience the same stimulus, [[Diffusion of responsibility|diffusion of responsibility]] may release individuals from the need to act, and if no-one from the group is seen to act, each individual may be further inhibited by [[Conformity_%28psychology%29#Normative_influence|conformity]]. On a wider basis, all members of society are exposed to so many messages about pressing matters of concern that [[Information overload]] may play a part. There may also be a tendency to argue that "I can't fix this problem, so I need do nothing to reduce it" (a [[Perfect solution fallacy|perfect solution fallacy]]).
| | A 1976 edition of the journal ''[[Ekistics]]'' used the phrase in the context of bureaucratic inaction on [[low-income housing]], describing "the principle of ''somebody else's problem''" as something that prevented progress. Where responsibility for a complex problem falls across many different departments of government, even those agencies who wish to tackle the issue are unable to do so.<ref>[https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=ekistics+1976+somebody+else%27s+problem&btnG= Seventeen reasons why the squatter problem can't be solved], S Angel, S Benjamin - [[Ekistics]], 1976</ref> |
|
| |
|
| ==Somebody Else's Problem field==
| | Referring to a team working on a [[computer programming]] project, [[Alan F. Blackwell]] wrote in 1997 that: "Many sub-goals can be deferred to the degree that they become what is known amongst professional programmers as an 'S.E.P.' – somebody else's problem."<ref name=ppig-1997-01>{{Cite journal |
| [[Image:Lords test match.jpg|thumb|right|''[[Starship Bistromath]]'' apparently invisible to the crowd at [[Lord's Cricket Ground]], [[London]]]]
| | <!-- more info on this cite may someday show up at http://www.ppig.org/workshops/ppig-1997-9th-annual-workshop --> |
| [[Douglas Adams]] has his character [[Ford Prefect (character)|Ford Prefect]] describe Somebody Else's Problem in ''[[Life, the Universe and Everything]]'', the third book of the ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'' series:
| | |url = http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~afb21/publications/PPIG97.html |
| | |title = Simulating a Software Project: The PoP Guns go to War |
| | |last1 = Blackwell |first1 = Alan F.|author-link= Alan F. Blackwell |
| | |last2 = Arnold |first2 = H.L. |
| | |journal = Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group |
| | |pages = 53–60 |
| | |date = January 1997 |
| | |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081026050403/http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~afb21/publications/PPIG97.html |
| | |archive-date = 2008-10-26 |
| | |url-status = live |
| | |access-date = 2015-03-24 |
| | }}</ref> |
|
| |
|
| {{cquote2|An SEP is something we can't see, or don't see, or our brain doesn't let us see, because we think that it's somebody else's problem.... The brain just edits it out, it's like a blind spot. If you look at it directly you won't see it unless you know precisely what it is. Your only hope is to catch it by surprise out of the corner of your eye.}}
| | ==Douglas Adams' SEP field== |
|
| |
|
| In this case, "a small upended Italian bistro" with "guidance fins, rocket engines and escape hatches" has been hidden by the "Someone Else's Problem field" which "can be run for over a hundred years on a single torch battery":
| | [[Douglas Adams]]' 1982 novel ''[[Life, the Universe and Everything]]'' (in ''[[The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy#Novels|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]]'' [[comedy science fiction]] series) introduces the idea of an "SEP [[Field (physics)|field]]" as a kind of [[cloaking device]]. The character [[Ford Prefect (character)|Ford Prefect]] says, |
|
| |
|
| {{cquote2|This is because it relies on people's natural predisposition not to see anything they don't want to, weren't expecting, or can't explain.}}
| | The narration then explains: |
|
| |
|
| The book says that the SEP field is derived from [[Bistromathics]] and in particular the concept of an imaginary number called a "recipriversexcluson" whose existence can only be defined as being anything other than itself. Modern science has been slow to investigate this further, though [http://pantheon.yale.edu/~jw378/ Professor John Wettlaufer] (of [[Yale University]]) has apparently observed that it is very important for physicists working outside the mainstream "to have a genuine interest in learning about someone else's problem". However, he admitted that "not many people want to do this".<ref>{{cite web |url=http://physicsworld.com/blog/2008/03/ |title=March 2008 Archives - Physicists and climate change |publisher=physicsworld.com |accessdate=2008-06-06}}</ref>
| | Adams' description of an SEP field is quoted in an article of "psychological invisibility", where it is compared to other fictional effects such as the perception filter in ''[[Doctor Who]]'', as well as cognitive biases such as [[inattentional blindness]] and [[change blindness]].<ref>[https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/13/sight-unseen-critic-at-large-kathryn-schulz Sight unseen], Catherine Schulz, [[The New Yorker]], April 13, 2015</ref> |
|
| |
|
| ==Cultural importance of Somebody Else's Problem== | | ==See also== |
| | * [[Abilene paradox]] |
| | * [[Buck passing]] |
| | * [[Bystander effect]] |
| | * [[Externality]] |
| | * [[First They Came]] |
| | * [[Moral responsibility]] |
| | * [[NIMBY]] (not in my back yard) |
| | * [[Other people's money (disambiguation)|Other people's money]] |
| | * [[Sheeple]] |
|
| |
|
| Douglas Adams was concerned about such failures to recognise the need for action, and with [[Mark Carwardine]] published the book ''[[Last Chance to See]]'' which highlighted endangered animal species.
| | ==References== |
| | {{reflist}} |
|
| |
|
| ==Notes==
| | [[Category:Group processes]] |
| {{reflist}}
| | [[Category:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy]] |
| | [[Category:Perception]] |
| | [[Category:Problem solving]] |
| | |
| | [[cs:Seznam pojmů, osob a vynálezů ze Stopařova průvodce po Galaxii#Pole problému někoho jiného]] |
| | [[de:Hintergründe zu Per Anhalter durch die Galaxis#Problem-anderer-Leute-Feld]] |