WebAuthn: Difference between revisions
m →In the media: Use more clean link |
|||
| Line 159: | Line 159: | ||
*"Passkey technology is elegant, but it’s most definitely not usable security"<ref>https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/12/passkey-technology-is-elegant-but-its-most-definitely-not-usable-security/</ref> - Dan Goodin – December 30, 2024 [[Ars Technica]] | *"Passkey technology is elegant, but it’s most definitely not usable security"<ref>https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/12/passkey-technology-is-elegant-but-its-most-definitely-not-usable-security/</ref> - Dan Goodin – December 30, 2024 [[Ars Technica]] | ||
<blockquote>...the implementation seems to have failed the "make it easy for users" test, which in my view is the whole point of passkeys. I have been using [[public key cryptography]] for 30-plus years...If I find passkeys confusing to use, it doesn’t bode well for more typical users.<ref>https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/17/passkeys_passwords/</ref> - Bruce Davie, 17 Nov 2024 [[ | <blockquote>...the implementation seems to have failed the "make it easy for users" test, which in my view is the whole point of passkeys. I have been using [[public key cryptography]] for 30-plus years...If I find passkeys confusing to use, it doesn’t bode well for more typical users.<ref>https://www.theregister.com/2024/11/17/passkeys_passwords/</ref> - Bruce Davie, 17 Nov 2024 [[The Register]]</blockquote> | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||