Archive:Introduction to US History/Justification: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Geoff Plourde |
wikademia>Jade Knight |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*to start with, the author immediately discounts the major theory on North american settlement; the 'bering land' bridge theory. While it is true that recent scholarship has painted a more complex picture of N american settlement than this 1920's era theory. We do not need to in the words of the talk page; assume that the bering land bridge theory only works if 'million' of siberians cross into america. This is a 'straw man' theory for sure.Indeed recent scholarship has proved that there are undeniable migrations through the bering land bridge. | *to start with, the author immediately discounts the major theory on North american settlement; the 'bering land' bridge theory. While it is true that recent scholarship has painted a more complex picture of N american settlement than this 1920's era theory. We do not need to in the words of the talk page; assume that the bering land bridge theory only works if 'million' of siberians cross into america. This is a 'straw man' theory for sure.Indeed recent scholarship has proved that there are undeniable migrations through the bering land bridge. | ||
--[[User:Jolie|Jolie]] 18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Jolie|Jolie]] 18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
**I don't know that such a claim, although evidently incorrect, is properly a "straw man". It is more simply a "false claim", which is not necessarily the same thing. More significantly: Why not simply edit the current Wikibook to be more accurate? [[user:Jade Knight|The Jade Knight]] <sup>[[User talk:Jade Knight|(d'viser)]]</sup> 07:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:23, 19 October 2008
Why not the featured US History book
which is found at wikibooks here. [1].
from nearly the opening chapter of the book, what I have found was neither neutral nor easily corrected.
- to start with, the author immediately discounts the major theory on North american settlement; the 'bering land' bridge theory. While it is true that recent scholarship has painted a more complex picture of N american settlement than this 1920's era theory. We do not need to in the words of the talk page; assume that the bering land bridge theory only works if 'million' of siberians cross into america. This is a 'straw man' theory for sure.Indeed recent scholarship has proved that there are undeniable migrations through the bering land bridge.
--Jolie 18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know that such a claim, although evidently incorrect, is properly a "straw man". It is more simply a "false claim", which is not necessarily the same thing. More significantly: Why not simply edit the current Wikibook to be more accurate? The Jade Knight (d'viser) 07:23, 19 October 2008 (UTC)