Top 100 Global Universities: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Axt No edit summary |
wikademia>Axt |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|6. [[University of Cambridge]] | |6. [[University of Cambridge]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|7. [[Massachusetts Institute Technology]] | |7. [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|8. [[Oxford University]] | |8. [[Oxford University]] | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
|47. [[University of Edinburgh]] | |47. [[University of Edinburgh]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|48. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign | |48. [[University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|49. [[University of Bristol]] | |49. [[University of Bristol]] | ||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
|58. [[University of Manchester]] | |58. [[University of Manchester]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|59. University of California at Santa Barbara | |59. [[University of California at Santa Barbara]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|60. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology | |60. [[Hong Kong University of Science and Technology]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|61. Wageningen University | |61. [[Wageningen University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|62. Michigan State University | |62. [[Michigan State University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|63. [[University of Munich]] | |63. [[University of Munich]] | ||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
|65. [[Boston University]] | |65. [[Boston University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|66. Vanderbilt University | |66. [[Vanderbilt University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|67. University of Rochester | |67. [[University of Rochester]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|68. Tohoku University | |68. [[Tohoku University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|69. University of Hong Kong | |69. [[University of Hong Kong]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|70. [[University of Sheffield]] | |70. [[University of Sheffield]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|71. Nanyang Technological University | |71. [[Nanyang Technological University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|72. [[University of Vienna]] | |72. [[University of Vienna]] | ||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
|78. [[University of Western Australia]] | |78. [[University of Western Australia]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|79. [[Ecole Normale | |79. [[Ecole Normale Superieure Paris]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|80. [[University of Virginia]] | |80. [[University of Virginia]] | ||
| Line 191: | Line 191: | ||
|93. [[Emory University]] | |93. [[Emory University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|94. Nagoya University | |94. [[Nagoya University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|95. Case Western Reserve University | |95. [[Case Western Reserve University]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|96. Chinese University of Hong Kong | |96. [[Chinese University of Hong Kong]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
|97. [[University of Newcastle]] | |97. [[University of Newcastle]] | ||
| Line 205: | Line 205: | ||
|100. [[Sussex University]] | |100. [[Sussex University]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
==Criticism== | ==Criticism== | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 7 July 2008
The Top 100 Global Universities is a ranking of the best College and University programs in the world as indicated by a survey conducted by Newsweek. The schools were evaluated on some of the measures used in well-known rankings published by Shanghai Jiaotong University and Times Higher Education. Fifty percent of the score came from equal parts of three measures used by Shanghai Jiatong: the number of highly-cited researchers in various academic fields, the number of articles published in Nature and Science, and the number of articles listed in the ISI Social Sciences and Arts & Humanities indices. Another 40 percent of the score came from equal parts of four measures used by the Times: the percentage of international faculty, the percentage of international students, citations per faculty member (using ISI data), and the ratio of faculty to students. The final 10 percent came from library holdings (number of volumes).
Top 100 Global Universities 2007
Criticism
Criticism of college and university rankings (North America)
vi: Top 100 trường đại học trên thế giới
| Lost on Wikademia? Please help by choosing project boxes to classify this resource by: |