Homeopathy edit war/Where are they now

A large number of advocates for and against homeopathy have been blocked, desysoped or banned. This page is a record of the fates of these editors.

Ed Poor

• 14:59, 1 March 2005 Ed Poor (talk | contribs | block) changed rights for User:Ed Poor (=sysop, steward, developer)
• 12:42, 10 January 2008 NoSeptember (talk | contribs | block) changed rights for User:Ed Poor to (none) ‎

"I became less active a couple of years ago, a group of tag team editors discovered they could pin a false accusation of POV pushing and "undue weight" on me and got me banned from the Intelligent Design article. Ironically, the result is that the article condemns ID instead of being neutral. Note: I don't want the article to endorse ID - to be neutral on a controversial topic, a Wikipedia article should neither endorse nor condemn any viewpoint." (see) Edits to the homeopathy article between 2002-03-25 13:46 and 2002-03-25 13:47.

PouponOnToast

1 July 2008 Abusing multiple accounts: Apparent bad-hand sockpuppet Edits to the homeopathy article between 2008-01-23 and 2008-02-11 21:39.

• User:DepartedUser
• User:Hipocrite

Vanished user

• Possibly the most prolific Wikipedia skeptic of homeopathy (hard to be sure with all the puppet accounts).
• First known edit in early 2006. Edits to the homeopathy article between 2007-02-18 and 2008-02-08.
• He was an administrator from March 2007 until February 2008 when brought up before ArbCom for biting newcomers with unpopular views, which resulted in him resigning as an administrator.
• He was briefly a candidate for the Wikipedia ArbCom in December 2007: "I've not shunned controversy - I've done a lot of work on Homeopathy" then he later said, "I withdraw. I do not think I could work with the Arbcom."
• While editing as Shoemaker's Holiday he has had edits to the homeopathy article between 2008-04-15 and 2009-05-14. He tried to regain his adminship, but his past caught up with him.
• Claimed to be quitting Wikipedia in June 2009.

Filll

Many edits to the homeopathy article 2007-07-12 to 2008-03-17

"Succusion? That is a nonstandard term that does not appear in a dictionary and is ill-defined in all the homeopathic literature, most of which we cannot cite because it is not peer-reviewed or in mainstream venues"

Compare to the discussion of succussion here.

Interactions with "Dragons flight" led to a reprimand. "you will have your head handed to you"

Peter morrell

This kind of comment: "you hate homeopathy and have been on a crusade to destroy these artciles, haven't you?" earned a block 20 July 2007

"I am a major published historian of this subject" - his collection articles on Homeopathy

Many edits to the homopathy article from 2006-05-08 to 2008-05-13