Jump to content

Economies of density: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
m →top: clean up using AWB
re-ordering sections—WP:ORDER
Line 5: Line 5:


Economies of density are not to be confused with [[economies of scale]] where unit costs are not linked to spatial properties.
Economies of density are not to be confused with [[economies of scale]] where unit costs are not linked to spatial properties.
== References ==
<!--- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes on how to create references using <ref></ref> tags, these references will then appear here automatically -->
{{Reflist}}


==See also==
==See also==
Line 15: Line 11:
* [[Network effects]]
* [[Network effects]]
* [[Economies of agglomeration]]
* [[Economies of agglomeration]]
== References ==
<!--- See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes on how to create references using <ref></ref> tags, these references will then appear here automatically -->
{{Reflist}}


<!--- Categories --->
<!--- Categories --->

Revision as of 01:15, 31 March 2017

In microeconomics, economies of density express cost savings resulting from spatial proximity of suppliers or providers. Typically higher population densities allow synergies in service provision leading to lower unit costs. If large economies of density exists there is an incentive for people to concentrate and agglomerate.[1]

Typical examples are found in logistic systems where the distribution or collection of goods is needed, such as solid waste management.[2] Delivering e.g. mail in an area with many postboxes results in overall cost savings and thus lower delivery costs. Different network infrastructures such as electricity or gas networks show as well economies of density.

Economies of density are not to be confused with economies of scale where unit costs are not linked to spatial properties.

See also

References