WebAuthn: Difference between revisions
m grammar |
m →Criticism: typo, grammar, punctuation |
||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
The auditors from Paragon Initiative Enterprises also criticized the way in which the standard was initially developed, as the proposal was not made public in advance and experienced cryptographers were not asked for suggestions and feedback. Hence the standard was not subject to broad cryptographic research from the academic world. | The auditors from Paragon Initiative Enterprises also criticized the way in which the standard was initially developed, as the proposal was not made public in advance and experienced cryptographers were not asked for suggestions and feedback. Hence the standard was not subject to broad cryptographic research from the academic world. | ||
Despite these shortcomings the | Despite these shortcomings the researchers from Paragon Initiative Enterprises still encourage users to continue to use WebAuthn but came up with some recommendations for potential implementors and developers of the standard, hoping that they can be implemented before the standard is finalized. Avoiding such mistakes as early as possible would prevent the industry from any challenges that are introduced by broken standards and the need for [[Backward_compatibility|backwards compatibility]]. | ||
= References = | = References = | ||