Archive:Inverse semigroup: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Silverfish m Stub-sorting. You can help! |
wikademia>CDH Expanded stub. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Practice | |||
An '''inverse semigroup''' ''S'' is a [[semigroup]] in which every element ''x'' in ''S'' has a unique '''inverse''' | |||
''y'' in ''S'' in the sense that ''x = xyx'' and ''y = yxy''. Inverse semigroups appear in a range of contexts; for | |||
example, they can be employed in the study [[partial symmetries]].<ref>Lawson 1998.</ref> | |||
(The convention followed in this article will be that of writing a function on the right of its argument, and | |||
composing functions from left to right - a convention often observed in semigroup theory.) | |||
== Origins == | |||
Inverse semigroups were introduced independently by [[Viktor Vladimirovich Wagner]] in the [[Soviet Union]] in | |||
[[1952]]<ref>First a short announcement in Wagner 1952, then a much more comprehensive exposition in Wagner | |||
1953.</ref>, and by [[Gordon Preston]] in [[Great Britain]] in [[1954]]<ref>Preston 1954a,b,c.</ref>. Both authors | |||
arrived at inverse semigroups via the study of partial one-one transformations of a [[set]]: a [[partial | |||
function|partial transformation]] α of a set ''X'' is a [[Function (mathematics)|function]] from ''A'' to | |||
''B'', where ''A'' and ''B'' are subsets of ''X''. Let α and β be partial transformations of a set | |||
''X''; α and β can be composed (from left to right) on the largest [[Domain (mathematics)|domain]] upon | |||
which it "makes sense" to compose them: | |||
:dom αβ = [im α <math>\cap</math> dom β]α<sup>-1</sup> | |||
where α<sup>-1</sup> denotes the [[preimage]] under α. Partial transformations had already been studied | |||
in the context of [[pseudogroup|pseudogroups]].<ref>See, for example, Golab 1939.</ref> It was Wagner, however, who | |||
was the first to observe that the composition of partial transformations is a special case of the multiplication of | |||
[[binary relations]].<ref>Schein 2002 : 152.</ref> He recognised also that the domain of composition of two partial | |||
transformations may be the [[empty set]], so he introduced an ''empty transformation'' to take account of this. | |||
With the addition of this empty transformation, the composition of partial transformations of a set becomes an | |||
everywhere-defined [[associative]] [[binary operation]]. Under this composition, the collection | |||
<math>\mathcal{I}_X</math> of all partial one-one transformations of a set ''X'' forms an inverse semigroup, called | |||
the ''symmetric inverse semigroup'' (or monoid) on ''X''.<ref>Howie 1995 : 149.</ref> This is the "archetypal" | |||
inverse semigroup, in the same way that a [[symmetric group]] is the archetypal [[group (mathematics)|group]]. For | |||
example, just as every [[group (mathematics)|group]] can be embedded in a [[symmetric group]], every inverse | |||
semigroup can be embedded in a symmetric inverse semigroup (see below). | |||
== The basics == | |||
The inverse of an element ''x'' of an inverse semigroup ''S'' is usually written ''x''<sup>-1</sup>. Inverses in an | |||
inverse semigroup have many of the same properties as inverses in a [[group (mathematics)|group]], for example, | |||
(''ab'')<sup>-1</sup> = ''b''<sup>-1</sup>''a''<sup>-1</sup>. In an inverse [[monoid]], ''xx''<sup>-1</sup> and | |||
''x''<sup>-1</sup>''x'' are not (necessarily) equal to the identity, but they are both [[idempotent]].<ref>Howie | |||
1995 : Proposition 5.1.2(1).</ref> An inverse monoid ''S'' in which ''xx''<sup>-1</sup> = 1 = | |||
''x''<sup>-1</sup>''x'', for all ''x'' in ''S'' (a ''unipotent'' inverse monoid), is, of course, a [[group (mathematics)|group]]. | |||
There are a number of equivalent characterisations of an inverse semigroup ''S'':<ref>Howie 1995 : Theorem | |||
5.1.1.</ref> | |||
* Every element of ''S'' has a unique inverse, in the above sense. | |||
* Every element of ''S'' has at least one inverse (''S'' is a [[regular semigroup]]) and [[idempotent|idempotents]] commute (that is, the [[idempotent|idempotents]] of ''S'' form a [[semilattice]]). | |||
* Every <math>\mathcal{L}</math>-class and every <math>\mathcal{R}</math>-class contains precisely one [[idempotent]], where <math>\mathcal{L}</math> and <math>\mathcal{R}</math> are two of [[Green's relations]]. | |||
The [[idempotent]] in the <math>\mathcal{L}</math>-class of ''s'' is ''s''<sup>-1</sup>''s'', whilst the | |||
[[idempotent]] in the <math>\mathcal{R}</math>-class of ''s'' is ''ss''<sup>-1</sup>. There is therefore a simple | |||
characterisation of [[Green's relations]] in an inverse semigroup:<ref>Howie 1995 : Proposition 5.1.2(1).</ref> | |||
:<math>a\,\mathcal{L}\,b\Longleftrightarrow a^{-1}a=b^{-1}b,\quad a\,\mathcal{R}\,b\Longleftrightarrow | |||
aa^{-1}=bb^{-1}</math> | |||
Examples of inverse semigroups: | |||
*Every [[group (mathematics)|group]] is an inverse semigroup. | |||
*The [[bicyclic semigroup]] is inverse, with (''a'',''b'')<sup>-1</sup> = (''b'',''a''). | |||
*Every [[semilattice]] is inverse. | |||
*The [[Brandt semigroup]] is inverse. | |||
*The [[Munn semigroup]] is inverse. | |||
Unless stated otherwise, ''E(S)'' will denote the semilattice of idempotents of an inverse semigroup ''S''. | |||
== The natural partial order == | |||
An inverse semigroup ''S'' possesses a ''natural [[partial order]]'' relation ≤ (sometimes denoted by ω) | |||
which is defined by the following:<ref>Wagner 1952.</ref> | |||
:<math>a \leq b \Longleftrightarrow a=eb,</math> | |||
for some [[idempotent]] ''e'' in ''S''. Equivalently, | |||
:<math>a \leq b \Longleftrightarrow a=bf,</math> | |||
for some (in general, different) [[idempotent]] ''f'' in ''S''. In fact, ''e'' can be taken to be | |||
''aa''<sup>-1</sup> and ''f'' to be ''a''<sup>-1</sup>''a''.<ref>Howie 1995 : Proposition 5.2.1.</ref> | |||
The natural [[partial order]] is compatible with both multiplication and inversion, that is,<ref>Howie 1995 : | |||
152-3</ref> | |||
:<math>a \leq b, c \leq d \Longrightarrow ac \leq bd</math> | |||
and | |||
:<math>a \leq b \Longrightarrow a^{-1} \leq b^{-1}.</math> | |||
In a [[group (mathematics)|group]], this [[partial order]] simply reduces to equality, since the identity is the | |||
only [[idempotent]]. In a symmetric inverse semigroup, the [[partial order]] reduces to restriction of mappings, | |||
i.e., α ≤ β if, and only if, the domain of α is contained in the domain of β and | |||
''x''α = ''x''β, for all ''x'' in the domain of α.<ref>Howie 1995 : 153.</ref> | |||
The natural partial order on an inverse semigroup interacts with [[Green's relations]] as follows: if ''s'' ≤ | |||
''t'' and ''s''<math>\,\mathcal{L}\,</math>''t'', then ''s'' = ''t''. Similarly, if | |||
''s''<math>\,\mathcal{R}\,</math>''t''.<ref>Lawson 1998 : Proposition 3.2.3.</ref> | |||
On ''E(S)'', the natural [[partial order]] becomes: | |||
:<math>e \leq f \Longleftrightarrow e = ef,</math> | |||
so the product of any two [[idempotent|idempotents]] in ''S'' is equal to the lesser of the two, with respect to | |||
≤. If ''E(S)'' forms a [[chain (order theory)|chain]] (i.e., ''E(S)'' is [[totally ordered]] by ≤), then | |||
''S'' is a [[union (set theory)|union]] of [[group (mathematics)|groups]].<ref>Clifford & Preston 1967 : Theorem | |||
7.5</ref> | |||
== Homomorphisms and representations of inverse semigroups == | |||
A [[homomorphism]] (or ''morphism'') of inverse semigroups is defined in exactly the same way as for any other | |||
semigroup: for inverse semigroups ''S'' and ''T'', a [[function (mathematics)|function]] θ from ''S'' to ''T'' | |||
is a morphism if (''s''θ)(''t''θ) = (''st'')θ, for all ''s'',''t'' in ''S''. The definition of a | |||
morphism of inverse semigroups could be augmented by including the condition (''s''θ)<sup>-1</sup> = | |||
''s''<sup>-1</sup>θ, however, there is no need to do so, since this property follows from the above | |||
definition, via the following theorem: | |||
'''Theorem.''' The homomorphic [[image (mathematics)|image]] of an inverse semigroup is an inverse semigroup; the | |||
inverse of an element is always mapped to the inverse of the [[image (mathematics)|image]] of that | |||
element.<ref>Clifford & Preston 1967 : Theorem 7.36.</ref> | |||
One of the earliest results proved about inverse semigroups was the ''Wagner-Preston Theorem'', which is an analogue | |||
of [[Cayley's Theorem]] for [[group (mathematics)|groups]]: | |||
'''Wagner-Preston Theorem.''' If ''S'' is an inverse semigroup, then the [[function (mathematics)|function]] φ | |||
from ''S'' to <math>\mathcal{I}_S</math>, given by | |||
:dom φ = ''Sa''<sup>-1</sup> and ''x''(''a''φ) = ''xa'' | |||
is a [[faithful representation]] of ''S''.<ref>Howie 1995 : Theorem 5.1.7. Originally, Wagner 1952 and, | |||
independently, Preston 1954c.</ref> | |||
Thus, any inverse semigroup can be embedded in a symmetric inverse semigroup. | |||
== Congruences on inverse semigroups == | |||
[[Congruences]] are defined on inverse semigroups in exactly the same way as for any other semigroup: a | |||
''congruence'' ρ is an [[equivalence relation]] which is compatible with semigroup multiplication, i.e., | |||
:<math>a\,\rho\,b,\quad c\,\rho\,d\Longrightarrow ac\,\rho\,bd.</math><ref>Howie 1995 : 22</ref> | |||
Of particular interest is the relation <math>\sigma</math>, defined on an inverse semigroup ''S'' by | |||
:<math>a\,\sigma\,b\Longleftrightarrow</math> there exists a <math>c\in S</math> with <math>c\leq | |||
a,b.</math><ref>Lawson 1998 : 62</ref> | |||
It can be shown that σ is a congruence and that the factor semigroup ''S''/σ is, in fact, a group. | |||
Indeed, σ is the ''smallest'' congruence on ''S'' such that ''S''/σ is a group, that is, if τ is any | |||
other congruence on ''S'' with ''S''/τ a group, then σ is contained in τ. The congruence σ is | |||
called the ''minimum group congruence'' on ''S''.<ref>Lawson 1998 : Theorem 2.4.1.</ref> The minimum group | |||
congruence can be used to give a characterisation of ''E''-unitary inverse semigroups (see below). | |||
A congruence ρ on an inverse semigroup ''S'' is called ''idempotent pure'' if | |||
:<math>a\in S, e\in E(S), a\,\rho\,e\Longrightarrow a\in E(S).</math><ref>Lawson 1998 : 65</ref> | |||
== ''E''-unitary inverse semigroups == | |||
One class of inverse semigroups which has been studied extensively over the years is the class of ''E-unitary | |||
inverse semigroups'': an inverse semigroup ''S'' (with [[semilattice]] ''E'' of [[idempotent|idempotents]]) is | |||
''E-unitary'' if, for all ''e'' in ''E'' and all ''s'' in ''S'', | |||
:<math>es \in E \Longrightarrow s \in E.</math> | |||
Equivalently, | |||
:<math>se \in E \Rightarrow s \in E.</math><ref>Howie 1995 : 192.</ref> | |||
One further characterisation of an ''E''-unitary inverse semigroup ''S'' is the following: if ''e'' is in ''E'' and | |||
''e'' ≤ ''s'', for some ''s'' in ''S'', then ''s'' is in ''E''.<ref>Lawson 1998 : Proposition 2.4.3.</ref> | |||
'''Theorem.''' Let ''S'' be an inverse semigroup with [[semilattice]] ''E'' of idempotents, and minimum group | |||
congruence σ. Then the following are equivalent:<ref>Lawson 1998 : Theorem 2.4.6.</ref> | |||
*''S'' is ''E''-unitary; | |||
*σ is idempotent pure; | |||
*<math>\sim</math> = σ, | |||
where <math>\sim</math> is the ''compatibility relation'' on ''S'', defined by | |||
:<math>a\sim b\Longleftrightarrow ab^{-1},a^{-1}b</math> are idempotent. | |||
Central to the study of ''E''-unitary inverse semigroups is the following construction.<ref>Howie 1995 : 193-4</ref> Let <math>\mathcal{X}</math> be a [[partially ordered set]], with ordering ≤, and let <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> be a [[subset]] of <math>\mathcal{X}</math> with the properties that | |||
*<math>\mathcal{Y}</math> is a [[semilattice|lower semilattice]], that is, every pair of elements ''A'', ''B'' in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> has a [[greatest lower bound]] ''A'' <math>\wedge</math> ''B'' in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> (with respect to ≤); | |||
*<math>\mathcal{Y}</math> is an [[order ideal]] of <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, that is, for ''A'', ''B'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, if ''A'' is in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> and ''B'' ≤ ''A'', then ''B'' is in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math>. | |||
Now let ''G'' be a [[group (mathematics)|group]] which [[group action|acts]] on <math>\mathcal{X}</math> (on the left), such that | |||
*for all ''g'' in ''G'' and all ''A'', ''B'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, ''gA'' = ''gB'' if, and only if, ''A'' = ''B''; | |||
*for each ''g'' in ''G'' and each ''B'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, there exists an ''A'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math> such that ''gA'' = ''B''; | |||
*for all ''A'', ''B'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, ''A'' ≤ ''B'' if, and only if, ''gA'' ≤ ''gB''; | |||
*for all ''g'', ''h'' in ''G'' and all ''A'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, ''g''(''hA'') = (''gh'')''A''. | |||
The triple <math>(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is also assumed to have the following properties: | |||
*for every ''X'' in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, there exists a ''g'' in ''G'' and an ''A'' in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> such that ''gA'' = ''X''; | |||
*for all ''g'' in ''G'', ''g''<math>\mathcal{Y}</math> and <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> have nonempty intersection. | |||
Such a triple <math>(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is called a ''McAlister triple''. A McAlister triple is | |||
used to define the following: | |||
:<math>P(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y}) = \{ (A,g) \in \mathcal{Y}\times G : g^{-1}A \in \mathcal{Y} \}</math> | |||
together with multiplication | |||
:<math>(A,g)(B,h)=(A \wedge gB, gh)</math>. | |||
Then <math>P(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is an inverse semigroup under this multiplication, with | |||
(''A'',''g'')<sup>-1</sup> = (''g''<sup>-1</sup>''A'', ''g''<sup>-1</sup>). One of the main results in the study of | |||
''E''-unitary inverse semigroups is ''McAlister's P-Theorem'': | |||
'''McAlister's P-Theorem.''' Let <math>(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> be a McAlister triple. Then <math>P(G, | |||
\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is an ''E''-unitary inverse semigroup. Conversely, every ''E''-unitary inverse | |||
semigroup is [[isomorphic]] to one of this type.<ref>Howie 1995 : Theorem 5.9.2. Originally, McAlister | |||
1974a,b.</ref> | |||
== Connections with category theory == | |||
The above composition of partial transformations of a set gives rise to a symmetric inverse semigroup. There is an | |||
another way of composing partial transformations, which is more restrictive than that used above: two partial | |||
transformations α and β are composed if, and only if, the image of α is equal to the domain of | |||
β; otherwise, the composition αβ is undefined. Under this alternative composition, the collection | |||
of all partial one-one transformations of a set forms not an inverse semigroup but an [[inductive groupoid]], in the | |||
sense of [[category theory]]. This close connection between inverse semigroups and [[inductive groupoids]] is | |||
embodied in the ''Ehresmann-Schein-Nambooripad Theorem'', which states that an [[inductive groupoid]] can always be | |||
constructed from an inverse semigroup, and conversely.<ref>Lawson 1998 : 4.1.8.</ref> | |||
== Generalisations of inverse semigroups == | |||
As noted above, an inverse semigroup ''S'' can be defined by the conditions (1) ''S'' is a [[regular semigroup]], | |||
and (2) the [[idempotent|idempotents]] in ''S'' commute; this has led to two distinct classes of generalisations of | |||
an inverse semigroup: semigroups in which (1) holds, but (2) does not, and vice versa. | |||
Examples of regular generalisations of an inverse semigroup are:<ref>Howie 1995 : Section 2.4 & Chapter 6.</ref> | |||
*''[[Regular semigroups]]'': a [[semigroup]] ''S'' is ''regular'' if every element has at least one inverse; equivalently, for each ''a'' in ''S'', there is an ''x'' in ''S'' such that ''axa'' = ''a''. | |||
*''Locally inverse semigroups'': a [[regular semigroup]] ''S'' is ''locally inverse'' if ''eSe'' is an inverse semigroup, for each [[idempotent]] ''e''. | |||
*''Orthodox semigroups'': a [[regular semigroup]] ''S'' is ''orthodox'' if its subset of [[idempotent|idempotents]] forms a subsemigroup. | |||
*''Generalised inverse semigroups'': a [[regular semigroup]] ''S'' is called a ''generalised inverse semigroup'' if its [[idempotent|idempotents]] form a normal band, i.e., ''xyzx'' = ''xzyx'', for all [[idempotent|idempotents]] ''x'', ''y'', ''z''. | |||
The [[class (set theory)|class]] of generalised inverse semigroups is the [[intersection (set theory)|intersection]] of the class of | |||
locally inverse semigroups and the class of orthodox semigroups.<ref>Howie 1995 : 222.</ref> | |||
Amongst the non-regular generalisations of an inverse semigroup are:<ref>Fountain | |||
1979.</ref>[http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~varg1/finitela.ps] | |||
*(Left, right, two-sided) adequate semigroups. | |||
*(Left, right, two-sided) ample semigroups. | |||
*(Left, right, two-sided) semiadequate semigroups. | |||
*Weakly (left, right, two-sided) ample semigroups. | |||
== Further reading == | |||
For a brief introduction to inverse semigroups, see either Clifford & Preston 1967 : Chapter 7 or Howie 1995 : | |||
Chapter 5. More comprehensive introductions can be found in Petrich 1984 and Lawson 1998. | |||
== Notes == | |||
<references/> | |||
== References == | |||
*A. H. Clifford and G. B. Preston, ''The Algebraic Theory of Semigroups'', Volume 2, Mathematical Surveys of the American Mathematical Society, No. 7, Providence, R.I., 1967. | |||
*{{cite journal | author=J. B. Fountain | title=Adequate semigroups | journal=Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society | year=1979 | volume=22 | pages=113-125}} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=St. Golab | title=Über den Begriff der "Pseudogruppe von Transformationen" | journal=Mathematische Annalen | year=1939 | volume=116 | pages=768-780}} | |||
*V. Gould, [http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~varg1/finitela.ps "(Weakly) left E-ample semigroups"] | |||
*J. M. Howie, ''Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory'', Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995. | |||
*M. V. Lawson, ''Inverse Semigroups: The Theory of Partial Symmetries'', World Scientific, 1998. | |||
*{{cite journal | author=D. B. McAlister | title=Groups, semilattices and inverse semigroups | journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society | year=1974a | volume=192 | pages=227-244 }} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=D. B. McAlister | title=Groups, semilattices and inverse semigroups II | journal=Transactions of the American Mathematical Society | year=1974b | volume=196 | pages=351-370 }} | |||
*M. Petrich, ''Inverse semigroups'', Wiley, New York, 1984. | |||
*{{cite journal | author=G. B. Preston | title=Inverse semi-groups | journal=Journal of the London Mathematical Society | year=1954a | volume=29 | pages=396-403 }} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=G. B. Preston | title=Inverse semi-groups with minimal right ideals | journal=Journal of the London Mathematical Society | year=1954b | volume=29 | pages=404-411 }} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=G. B. Preston | title=Representations of inverse semi-groups | journal=Journal of the London Mathematical Society | year=1954c | volume=29 | pages=411-419 }} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=B. M. Schein | title=Book Review: "Inverse Semigroups: The Theory of Partial Symmetries" by Mark V. Lawson | journal=Semigroup Forum | year=2002 | volume=65 | pages=149-158 }} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=V. V. Wagner | title=Generalised groups (Russian) | journal=Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR | year=1952 | volume=84 | pages=1119-1122 }} | |||
*{{cite journal | author=V. V. Wagner | title=The theory of generalised heaps and generalised groups (Russian) | journal=Matematicheskii Sbornik (N.S.) | year=1953 | volume=32(74) | pages=545-632 }} | |||
== See also == | |||
*[[Pseudogroup]] | |||
*[[Partial symmetries]] | |||
*[[Regular semigroup]] | |||
*[[Semilattice]] | |||
*[[Green's relations]] | |||
*[[Category theory]] | |||
*[[Inductive groupoid]] | |||
[[Category:Abstract algebra]] | |||
[[Category:Semigroup theory]] | [[Category:Semigroup theory]] | ||
Revision as of 08:57, 28 August 2006
Practice
An inverse semigroup S is a semigroup in which every element x in S has a unique inverse y in S in the sense that x = xyx and y = yxy. Inverse semigroups appear in a range of contexts; for example, they can be employed in the study partial symmetries.[1]
(The convention followed in this article will be that of writing a function on the right of its argument, and composing functions from left to right - a convention often observed in semigroup theory.)
Origins
Inverse semigroups were introduced independently by Viktor Vladimirovich Wagner in the Soviet Union in 1952[2], and by Gordon Preston in Great Britain in 1954[3]. Both authors arrived at inverse semigroups via the study of partial one-one transformations of a set: a [[partial function|partial transformation]] α of a set X is a function from A to B, where A and B are subsets of X. Let α and β be partial transformations of a set X; α and β can be composed (from left to right) on the largest domain upon which it "makes sense" to compose them:
- dom αβ = [im α <math>\cap</math> dom β]α-1
where α-1 denotes the preimage under α. Partial transformations had already been studied in the context of pseudogroups.[4] It was Wagner, however, who was the first to observe that the composition of partial transformations is a special case of the multiplication of binary relations.[5] He recognised also that the domain of composition of two partial transformations may be the empty set, so he introduced an empty transformation to take account of this. With the addition of this empty transformation, the composition of partial transformations of a set becomes an everywhere-defined associative binary operation. Under this composition, the collection <math>\mathcal{I}_X</math> of all partial one-one transformations of a set X forms an inverse semigroup, called the symmetric inverse semigroup (or monoid) on X.[6] This is the "archetypal" inverse semigroup, in the same way that a symmetric group is the archetypal group. For example, just as every group can be embedded in a symmetric group, every inverse semigroup can be embedded in a symmetric inverse semigroup (see below).
The basics
The inverse of an element x of an inverse semigroup S is usually written x-1. Inverses in an inverse semigroup have many of the same properties as inverses in a group, for example, (ab)-1 = b-1a-1. In an inverse monoid, xx-1 and x-1x are not (necessarily) equal to the identity, but they are both idempotent.[7] An inverse monoid S in which xx-1 = 1 = x-1x, for all x in S (a unipotent inverse monoid), is, of course, a group.
There are a number of equivalent characterisations of an inverse semigroup S:[8]
- Every element of S has a unique inverse, in the above sense.
- Every element of S has at least one inverse (S is a regular semigroup) and idempotents commute (that is, the idempotents of S form a semilattice).
- Every <math>\mathcal{L}</math>-class and every <math>\mathcal{R}</math>-class contains precisely one idempotent, where <math>\mathcal{L}</math> and <math>\mathcal{R}</math> are two of Green's relations.
The idempotent in the <math>\mathcal{L}</math>-class of s is s-1s, whilst the idempotent in the <math>\mathcal{R}</math>-class of s is ss-1. There is therefore a simple characterisation of Green's relations in an inverse semigroup:[9]
- <math>a\,\mathcal{L}\,b\Longleftrightarrow a^{-1}a=b^{-1}b,\quad a\,\mathcal{R}\,b\Longleftrightarrow
aa^{-1}=bb^{-1}</math>
Examples of inverse semigroups:
- Every group is an inverse semigroup.
- The bicyclic semigroup is inverse, with (a,b)-1 = (b,a).
- Every semilattice is inverse.
- The Brandt semigroup is inverse.
- The Munn semigroup is inverse.
Unless stated otherwise, E(S) will denote the semilattice of idempotents of an inverse semigroup S.
The natural partial order
An inverse semigroup S possesses a natural partial order relation ≤ (sometimes denoted by ω) which is defined by the following:[10]
- <math>a \leq b \Longleftrightarrow a=eb,</math>
for some idempotent e in S. Equivalently,
- <math>a \leq b \Longleftrightarrow a=bf,</math>
for some (in general, different) idempotent f in S. In fact, e can be taken to be aa-1 and f to be a-1a.[11]
The natural partial order is compatible with both multiplication and inversion, that is,[12]
- <math>a \leq b, c \leq d \Longrightarrow ac \leq bd</math>
and
- <math>a \leq b \Longrightarrow a^{-1} \leq b^{-1}.</math>
In a group, this partial order simply reduces to equality, since the identity is the only idempotent. In a symmetric inverse semigroup, the partial order reduces to restriction of mappings, i.e., α ≤ β if, and only if, the domain of α is contained in the domain of β and xα = xβ, for all x in the domain of α.[13]
The natural partial order on an inverse semigroup interacts with Green's relations as follows: if s ≤ t and s<math>\,\mathcal{L}\,</math>t, then s = t. Similarly, if s<math>\,\mathcal{R}\,</math>t.[14]
On E(S), the natural partial order becomes:
- <math>e \leq f \Longleftrightarrow e = ef,</math>
so the product of any two idempotents in S is equal to the lesser of the two, with respect to ≤. If E(S) forms a chain (i.e., E(S) is totally ordered by ≤), then S is a union of groups.[15]
Homomorphisms and representations of inverse semigroups
A homomorphism (or morphism) of inverse semigroups is defined in exactly the same way as for any other semigroup: for inverse semigroups S and T, a function θ from S to T is a morphism if (sθ)(tθ) = (st)θ, for all s,t in S. The definition of a morphism of inverse semigroups could be augmented by including the condition (sθ)-1 = s-1θ, however, there is no need to do so, since this property follows from the above definition, via the following theorem:
Theorem. The homomorphic image of an inverse semigroup is an inverse semigroup; the inverse of an element is always mapped to the inverse of the image of that element.[16]
One of the earliest results proved about inverse semigroups was the Wagner-Preston Theorem, which is an analogue of Cayley's Theorem for groups:
Wagner-Preston Theorem. If S is an inverse semigroup, then the function φ from S to <math>\mathcal{I}_S</math>, given by
- dom φ = Sa-1 and x(aφ) = xa
is a faithful representation of S.[17]
Thus, any inverse semigroup can be embedded in a symmetric inverse semigroup.
Congruences on inverse semigroups
Congruences are defined on inverse semigroups in exactly the same way as for any other semigroup: a congruence ρ is an equivalence relation which is compatible with semigroup multiplication, i.e.,
- <math>a\,\rho\,b,\quad c\,\rho\,d\Longrightarrow ac\,\rho\,bd.</math>[18]
Of particular interest is the relation <math>\sigma</math>, defined on an inverse semigroup S by
- <math>a\,\sigma\,b\Longleftrightarrow</math> there exists a <math>c\in S</math> with <math>c\leq
a,b.</math>[19] It can be shown that σ is a congruence and that the factor semigroup S/σ is, in fact, a group. Indeed, σ is the smallest congruence on S such that S/σ is a group, that is, if τ is any other congruence on S with S/τ a group, then σ is contained in τ. The congruence σ is called the minimum group congruence on S.[20] The minimum group congruence can be used to give a characterisation of E-unitary inverse semigroups (see below).
A congruence ρ on an inverse semigroup S is called idempotent pure if
- <math>a\in S, e\in E(S), a\,\rho\,e\Longrightarrow a\in E(S).</math>[21]
E-unitary inverse semigroups
One class of inverse semigroups which has been studied extensively over the years is the class of E-unitary inverse semigroups: an inverse semigroup S (with semilattice E of idempotents) is E-unitary if, for all e in E and all s in S,
- <math>es \in E \Longrightarrow s \in E.</math>
Equivalently,
- <math>se \in E \Rightarrow s \in E.</math>[22]
One further characterisation of an E-unitary inverse semigroup S is the following: if e is in E and e ≤ s, for some s in S, then s is in E.[23]
Theorem. Let S be an inverse semigroup with semilattice E of idempotents, and minimum group congruence σ. Then the following are equivalent:[24]
- S is E-unitary;
- σ is idempotent pure;
- <math>\sim</math> = σ,
where <math>\sim</math> is the compatibility relation on S, defined by
- <math>a\sim b\Longleftrightarrow ab^{-1},a^{-1}b</math> are idempotent.
Central to the study of E-unitary inverse semigroups is the following construction.[25] Let <math>\mathcal{X}</math> be a partially ordered set, with ordering ≤, and let <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> be a subset of <math>\mathcal{X}</math> with the properties that
- <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> is a lower semilattice, that is, every pair of elements A, B in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> has a greatest lower bound A <math>\wedge</math> B in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> (with respect to ≤);
- <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> is an order ideal of <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, that is, for A, B in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, if A is in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> and B ≤ A, then B is in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math>.
Now let G be a group which acts on <math>\mathcal{X}</math> (on the left), such that
- for all g in G and all A, B in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, gA = gB if, and only if, A = B;
- for each g in G and each B in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, there exists an A in <math>\mathcal{X}</math> such that gA = B;
- for all A, B in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, A ≤ B if, and only if, gA ≤ gB;
- for all g, h in G and all A in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, g(hA) = (gh)A.
The triple <math>(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is also assumed to have the following properties:
- for every X in <math>\mathcal{X}</math>, there exists a g in G and an A in <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> such that gA = X;
- for all g in G, g<math>\mathcal{Y}</math> and <math>\mathcal{Y}</math> have nonempty intersection.
Such a triple <math>(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is called a McAlister triple. A McAlister triple is used to define the following:
- <math>P(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y}) = \{ (A,g) \in \mathcal{Y}\times G : g^{-1}A \in \mathcal{Y} \}</math>
together with multiplication
- <math>(A,g)(B,h)=(A \wedge gB, gh)</math>.
Then <math>P(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is an inverse semigroup under this multiplication, with (A,g)-1 = (g-1A, g-1). One of the main results in the study of E-unitary inverse semigroups is McAlister's P-Theorem:
McAlister's P-Theorem. Let <math>(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> be a McAlister triple. Then <math>P(G, \mathcal{X}, \mathcal{Y})</math> is an E-unitary inverse semigroup. Conversely, every E-unitary inverse semigroup is isomorphic to one of this type.[26]
Connections with category theory
The above composition of partial transformations of a set gives rise to a symmetric inverse semigroup. There is an another way of composing partial transformations, which is more restrictive than that used above: two partial transformations α and β are composed if, and only if, the image of α is equal to the domain of β; otherwise, the composition αβ is undefined. Under this alternative composition, the collection of all partial one-one transformations of a set forms not an inverse semigroup but an inductive groupoid, in the sense of category theory. This close connection between inverse semigroups and inductive groupoids is embodied in the Ehresmann-Schein-Nambooripad Theorem, which states that an inductive groupoid can always be constructed from an inverse semigroup, and conversely.[27]
Generalisations of inverse semigroups
As noted above, an inverse semigroup S can be defined by the conditions (1) S is a regular semigroup, and (2) the idempotents in S commute; this has led to two distinct classes of generalisations of an inverse semigroup: semigroups in which (1) holds, but (2) does not, and vice versa.
Examples of regular generalisations of an inverse semigroup are:[28]
- Regular semigroups: a semigroup S is regular if every element has at least one inverse; equivalently, for each a in S, there is an x in S such that axa = a.
- Locally inverse semigroups: a regular semigroup S is locally inverse if eSe is an inverse semigroup, for each idempotent e.
- Orthodox semigroups: a regular semigroup S is orthodox if its subset of idempotents forms a subsemigroup.
- Generalised inverse semigroups: a regular semigroup S is called a generalised inverse semigroup if its idempotents form a normal band, i.e., xyzx = xzyx, for all idempotents x, y, z.
The class of generalised inverse semigroups is the intersection of the class of locally inverse semigroups and the class of orthodox semigroups.[29]
Amongst the non-regular generalisations of an inverse semigroup are:[30][1]
- (Left, right, two-sided) adequate semigroups.
- (Left, right, two-sided) ample semigroups.
- (Left, right, two-sided) semiadequate semigroups.
- Weakly (left, right, two-sided) ample semigroups.
Further reading
For a brief introduction to inverse semigroups, see either Clifford & Preston 1967 : Chapter 7 or Howie 1995 : Chapter 5. More comprehensive introductions can be found in Petrich 1984 and Lawson 1998.
Notes
- ↑ Lawson 1998.
- ↑ First a short announcement in Wagner 1952, then a much more comprehensive exposition in Wagner 1953.
- ↑ Preston 1954a,b,c.
- ↑ See, for example, Golab 1939.
- ↑ Schein 2002 : 152.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 149.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Proposition 5.1.2(1).
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Theorem 5.1.1.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Proposition 5.1.2(1).
- ↑ Wagner 1952.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Proposition 5.2.1.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 152-3
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 153.
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : Proposition 3.2.3.
- ↑ Clifford & Preston 1967 : Theorem 7.5
- ↑ Clifford & Preston 1967 : Theorem 7.36.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Theorem 5.1.7. Originally, Wagner 1952 and, independently, Preston 1954c.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 22
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : 62
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : Theorem 2.4.1.
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : 65
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 192.
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : Proposition 2.4.3.
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : Theorem 2.4.6.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 193-4
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Theorem 5.9.2. Originally, McAlister 1974a,b.
- ↑ Lawson 1998 : 4.1.8.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : Section 2.4 & Chapter 6.
- ↑ Howie 1995 : 222.
- ↑ Fountain 1979.
References
- A. H. Clifford and G. B. Preston, The Algebraic Theory of Semigroups, Volume 2, Mathematical Surveys of the American Mathematical Society, No. 7, Providence, R.I., 1967.
- J. B. Fountain (1979). "Adequate semigroups". Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 22: 113-125.
- St. Golab (1939). "Über den Begriff der "Pseudogruppe von Transformationen"". Mathematische Annalen 116: 768-780.
- V. Gould, "(Weakly) left E-ample semigroups"
- J. M. Howie, Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995.
- M. V. Lawson, Inverse Semigroups: The Theory of Partial Symmetries, World Scientific, 1998.
- D. B. McAlister (1974a). "Groups, semilattices and inverse semigroups". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 192: 227-244.
- D. B. McAlister (1974b). "Groups, semilattices and inverse semigroups II". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 196: 351-370.
- M. Petrich, Inverse semigroups, Wiley, New York, 1984.
- G. B. Preston (1954a). "Inverse semi-groups". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 29: 396-403.
- G. B. Preston (1954b). "Inverse semi-groups with minimal right ideals". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 29: 404-411.
- G. B. Preston (1954c). "Representations of inverse semi-groups". Journal of the London Mathematical Society 29: 411-419.
- B. M. Schein (2002). "Book Review: "Inverse Semigroups: The Theory of Partial Symmetries" by Mark V. Lawson". Semigroup Forum 65: 149-158.
- V. V. Wagner (1952). "Generalised groups (Russian)". Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 84: 1119-1122.
- V. V. Wagner (1953). "The theory of generalised heaps and generalised groups (Russian)". Matematicheskii Sbornik (N.S.) 32(74): 545-632.