Archive:Wikicracy: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Emesee m →External links: put descriptor below headings |
wikademia>Emesee m copied intro from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikigovernment&oldid=205171139 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Wikicracy''' | '''Wikicracy''', or Wikidemocracy, the future of democracy, is a model of government based on the open source and "wiki" concepts that have already been brought to the private sector, i.e. Wikipedia. The idea, at its most basic level, is bringing common citizens to the law, and allowing for a transparent law process and maximum public input using the latest technology. The pinnacle of this theory is allowing community members in any given jurisdiction direct access to its laws. Using wiki style editing, people can actually edit their demands into laws. | ||
This is wiki, please contribute to this paper. Thank you. | This is wiki, please contribute to this paper. Thank you. | ||
Revision as of 21:38, 22 June 2008
Wikicracy, or Wikidemocracy, the future of democracy, is a model of government based on the open source and "wiki" concepts that have already been brought to the private sector, i.e. Wikipedia. The idea, at its most basic level, is bringing common citizens to the law, and allowing for a transparent law process and maximum public input using the latest technology. The pinnacle of this theory is allowing community members in any given jurisdiction direct access to its laws. Using wiki style editing, people can actually edit their demands into laws.
This is wiki, please contribute to this paper. Thank you.
Let's imagine the future of wiki
Wikimedia projects
Collaboration using wikis is one of the few revolutionary inventions of the last few years in the social field. The philosophy behind the tool itself is at the same time simple and extremely powerful - everyone can contribute, in their own language, to the building of human knowledge.
Wikis help people to participate together efficiently without having to hold frequent meetings somewhere specific. Everyone can participate, wherever they may be, provided they have access to internet.
And even more extraordinary, is that contrary to forums, chats, e-mail or telephone conversations, wikis build upon what is previously stated; the first contribution made by someone is not forgotten. Over time the information on wikis is corrected (usually), modified, completed (sort of) by all the contributors that will be reading and editing the articles afterwards. Wikis also provide safeguards if someone intentionally or not had come and deleted useful information.
Wikis are already a success:
- for the global encyclopedia (wikipedia)
- for the dictionary (wiktionary)
- for the educational institution (wikiversity)
And other new projects, all having their own part in building a mankind-made information access for mankind.
Wikis are helping to build a global database that can be freely used by all humans, for photos and other media (wikimedia commons).
The revolution has just begun
Where we are: the efficient building up of knowledge
Wikimedia projects have mainly succeeded where information shall be according to the facts.
Why ?
Information is always biased in some way, more or less depending on many things. Sometimes, one may focus on one aspect of reality and forget about other aspects; and, in the worst case scenario, false information may be delivered by someone too close to the subject of an article. Thanks to the community and the wiki tool, a large amount of people check the articles, and thus can complete the other aspects not mentioned in the article, or put a warning if the article is thought to be biased. The more people that are watching the article, the more likely experts in the field will be looking at it, and the less chances are that errors won't get noticed. This is the key for most perfect information, once we understand that like everything in this world, nothing is perfect, but everything can be improved and can converge to the (unreachable by definition) ideal of perfection.
Where we can go: efficient facilitation of consensus - the future of democracy
Just like the facilitation of knowledge creation by wiki that occurs in an article, the wiki tool can become, if adapted, the ultimate tool for building political platforms, public budgeting, and all kinds of public consultation processesed. That is, it can become a basic tool for more powerful, more efficient forms of democracy.
Today, what I propose is to build together the tool that will allow a better democracy, this has been called by others political wiki
Requirements:
- Accessible from anyone in the world with internet access
- Enabling efficient online proposals study/amendment
- Vote/adoption procedures and elections
- Robust for virtually any kind of group, association, political party, city board, country, international institution
- Adaptable to business e.g. shareholders meeting.
Status of the project
- Beginning of 2007: idea of a way to put people working together online to make proposals in a cooperative way, and where people could vote on the proposals.
- Beginning of August: re-discovery of wiki and it appeared that the platform is the best tool for the idea.
- August 9th 2007: first publication of the project.
- August 10th: first try to make this project known to wikipedians in the perspective of gathering a team of democracy/organization experts and wiki programming experts.
- The project has been featured in on main page, latest news section. A new proposal regarding democracy on wikis is available at Wikicracy. Please review and comment.
- August 15th: created a trial testing page of socialtext wiki. Reviewing in process...
- August 23rd: wikimedia websites have been blocked once again by Chinese censors (including this page), after a few month of freedom for non-chinese language pages. Sorry for the delay. Test of socialtext has not been very enthousiastic. Are there real improvments compared to wiki? Some important wiki features have even disappeared...
- August 28th: finaly got the time to make a graphic proposal (see example at the bottom of the page) Vmandrilly 17:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
To-do list
- Discuss name of the project: wikacracy? wikicracy? wikiocracy? wikidemocracy? democracy 2.0? ...
- Studying websites related to wiki and software, to democracy and to decision making.
- At the same time, listing all the feature that implies this project.
- Working on translations of a short resume of the project. Vmandrilly I can do it for French, and maybe Chinese
- Designing the interface.
- And then later we will need to translate this into computer code...
Supporters
If you are an individuals or organization that supports this project, please list yourself here. (It's always nice for the contributers to receive encouragments, even if it is just symbolic. :-)
- Otterrocks 17:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Emesee
- ...
Existing software
Existing tools and add-ons that may be usefull for this project The fundamental base of the project
- MediaWiki --- Here is the available extentions page for MediaWiki.
Vote / poll systems
- ...
- ...
Others
- ...
- ...
Feature requests
(please post here the functions you would like to see implemented in Wikicracy betas)
Wikimedia
- Wikipedia: Wikigovernment
- Wikipedia: eRulemaking
- Wikipedia: Open source governance
- Wikipedia: Open politics
- Wikipedia: E-democracy
- Wikipedia: e-Government
- Wikipedia: Radical transparency
External links
Resources
Guidelines and important related texts:
- Open Politics article on wikipedia
- ERulemaking article on wikipedia
- A speech (video) from Ecuador President Rafael Correa to encourage Web 2.0 democracy! - proves clearly there is a big interest in democracy tools for the internet. Let's build it! - Thanks usuarioremoto for this link Vmandrilly 11:26, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Other
These are websites based on wiki and/or democracy principles. They may develop tools for their own wiki that could be used in this project. These websites/wikis may also be the firsts to wish to test Wikicracy betas.
- Mass-collaboration.net
- New Zealand is using a wiki to allow its citizens to write its Police Law It was tempoary unavaillable when I looked at it, let's hope it's going to be back online soon.
- Socialtext.com / The Socialtext article on wikimedia / Joi social workspace (a wiki project sharing similar interests) A wiki developed for businesses / projects. Seems very close to this project.
- ProtoForge (a similar tool, not based on MediaWiki, meant for organizing engineering laws (requirements))
- openpolitics.ca. Note: this project seems advanced, and they have probably made changes/add-ons to their wiki that could be use in this project
- Wikiparty international / Finnish wikiparty
- Debatepedia.org
- democracy.wikia.com
- metagovernment
- DellIdeastorm.com Non politic, but intended to bring democracy in public opinion and gather ideas from the users.
- the main idea seems to be this 'digging' system in which you can vote to make the issue more or less visible in the ranking. This looks much like the idea of 'priority' flag I designed on the proposal.(see above in 'example' section Vmandrilly 11:08, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- ¿WhyNot? Another interesting tool, that integrates some style of debate. and Voting for popularity of ideas flow. UsuarioRemoto