Archive:Advanced ANOVA/Factorial ANOVA: Difference between revisions
Appearance
wikademia>Jtneill |
wikademia>Jtneill →Descriptives: + another example table |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |||
Expanded, the descriptive table layout could look like this: | |||
{| border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" align="center" | |||
| | |||
| colspan="12" | <center>Gender</center> | |||
|- | |||
| Age | |||
| colspan="4" | <center>Males</center> | |||
| colspan="4" | <center>Females</center> | |||
| colspan="4" | <center>Overall</center> | |||
|- | |||
| Young | |||
| <center>''M''</center> | |||
| <center>''SD''</center> | |||
| <center>Sk</center> | |||
| <center>Kurt</center> | |||
| <center>''M''</center> | |||
| <center>''SD''</center> | |||
| <center>Sk</center> | |||
| <center>Kurt</center> | |||
| <center>''M''</center> | |||
| <center>''SD''</center> | |||
| <center>Sk</center> | |||
| <center>Kurt</center> | |||
|- | |||
| Middle | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| Older | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| Overall | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 1 October 2008
|
Design
Factorial ANOVA involves testing differences between group means based on two or more categorical independent variables, with a single, continuous dependent variable). More precisely, a factorial ANOVA could involve:
- 2 or more between subjects categorical/ordinal IVs
- 1 interval/ratio DV
e.g., what is the effect of Gender (2) and Degree Type (3) on Overall Satisfaction? This would be a 2 x 3 Factorial ANOVA (or 2 x 3 Between-Subjects ANOVA)
Results of interest are:
- Main effect of IV1
- Main effect of IV2
- Interaction b/w IV1 and IV2
If significant effects are found and more than 2 levels of an IV are involved, then specific contrasts are required, either:
- A priori (planned) contrasts
- Post-hoc contrasts
Effect sizes should also be reported.
General steps
- Establish hypothesis/hypotheses
- Make sure you have separate hypotheses for:
- Main effect for each IV
- Interactions between IVs
- Planned contrasts (if warranted)
- Make sure you have separate hypotheses for:
- Examine assumptions:
- IVs (categorical; between-subjects) and DV (at least interval)
- The data in each cell is normally distributed
- Homogeneity of variance (the variance in each cell is similar)
- Cells are independent
- Examine descriptive statistics, particularly the four moments (M, SD, Skewness, Kurtosis) overall, and also for each cell
- Examine graphs
- Conduct inferential test (ANOVA) and interpret significance of F scores
- Conduct follow-up tests (planned contrasts or post-hoc tests) if F is significant
- Interpret interactions
- Calculate and interpret effect sizes
- Eta-square (omnibus - equivalent to R2)
- Standardised mean effect size (difference b/w two means)
Example SPSS outputs
- Factorial ANOVA (example) - Are there differences in University Student Satisfaction levels between Gender and Age?
- Factorial ANOVA (example) - Are there differences in University Student Satisfaction levels between Gender and Age? - Are there differences in Locus of Control between Gender and Age?
Descriptives
- A table of descriptive statistics (M, SD, Skewness, and Kurtosis) for each cell and for each marginal total, and grand total should be presented when reporting results.
- For a 2-way ANOVA, the descriptives table should breakdown one IV in the columns and the other IV in the rows, such as illustrated in the following basic table design.
- Note that each of the three columns on the right should be further split into five columns to allow reporting of M, SD, Skewness, and Kurtosis, n.
| Age | |||
| Gender | Younger | Older | Total |
| Males | |||
| Females | |||
| Total | |||
Expanded, the descriptive table layout could look like this:
| Age | ||||||||||||
| Young | ||||||||||||
| Middle | ||||||||||||
| Older | ||||||||||||
| Overall | ||||||||||||
Understanding interactions
- One of the keys to understanding Factorial ANOVA is being able to intepret interactions.
- A recommended experiential exercise for learning about interactions is to fabricate a dataset which can be used to demonstrate factorial ANOVAs in which there are:
- No effects
- Main effect A, no main effect B, no interaction
- Main effect A, no main effect B, interaction
- No main effect A, main effect B, no interaction
- No main effect A, main effect B, interaction
- Main effect A, main effect B, no interaction
- Main effect A, main effect B, interaction
- Interaction, no main effects
Francis exercises
Effect sizes
See also
External links
- Factorial ANOVA (ucspace)
- Factorial ANOVA Notes (Handout)