Jump to content

Humane Quality: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>MaxSem
m Reverted edits by 3rd sock of Molag bal (Talk) to last version by Remi0o using rollback
wikademia>Zzuuzz
Replacing page with 'I like penis!'
Line 1: Line 1:
The [[Humane Quality]] is a [[component part]] of the [[Human Psyche]] (the [[Soul]]) that gives us a [[platform]] for [[Virtue]]. It can be thought of as a [[social singularity]] shared within a context of [[Mercy]]. The [[Collective Theology]] that has distilled itself into a [[colloidal constant]] provides a definition of both [[w:Quality|Quality]], in terms of the [[w:Human Condition|Human Condition]], and [[w:Quantity|Quantity]], in terms of the <tt>[[member_count]]</tt> for the [[Household of Faith]]. ([[w:Faith|Faith]]: the substance of things hoped for &ndash; the [[evidence]] of things not seen)
I like penis!
==Perspectives==
From a [[Theology|Theological perspective]], topics dealing with Humane aspects of [[Humanity]], give us reason to ponder that which is [[Beyond Reason]] or [[out-of-scope]] for those who adhere to [[strict logical guidelines]]. Kicking a [[w:dog|dog]], for example is considered a cruel and inhuman act. (exhibiting an in-''humane quality''). Mistreating a slave (though presumably, none exist today, at least in the so-called [[Free World]]]) is an even greater form of [[w:Malfeasance|Malfeasance]]. For most qualified [[human]]s, such an act is imponderable, reprehensible, ''Beyond Logic'' and essentially an aspect of [[Humane Quality#Defying Reason|Defying Reason]].
== Defying Reason ==
Computer systems that do not accomodate the [[Humane Quality]] are in violation of a simple, time-honored rule:
*''That which serves is not greater than that which it serves.''
 
[[Topic:User Interface]]s <small>[[Topic:User Interfaces]]</small> that are too cryptic for [[normal user]]s are not worthy to be called '''User Interfaces'''. Even from an [[Topic:Atheism|Atheistic]] point-of-view, Kicking a dog or mistreating a slave, as a [[Topic:Logic|matter-of-logic]], is generally construed as a misdeed that could lead to an [[Ethics|Ethical Dilimma]].
 
In terms of a study of the [[:Category:Humanities|Humanities]], [[Category:Dialog|Dialog]] and [[Category:Public Discourse|Public Discourse]] are the only ways of bringing to [[light]], the problems manifest when a few "bad apples" concede to failure to exhibit the [[Humane Quality]] in their daily activities, online and off. This [[:Category:Essays|essay]] is presented as an appeal to [[Special:Listusers|all]].
 
[[Category:Philosophy]]
[[Category:Humanities]]
[[Category:Dialog]]
[[Category:Public Discourse]]
[[Category:Essays]]

Revision as of 12:18, 26 April 2007

I like penis!