Archive:Introduction to US History/Justification: Difference between revisions
Appearance
wikademia>Jolie New page: == Why not the featured US History book == which is found at wikibooks here. [http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/US_History]. from nearly the opening chapter of the book, what I have found ... |
wikademia>Jolie |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
from nearly the opening chapter of the book, what I have found was neither neutral nor easily corrected. | from nearly the opening chapter of the book, what I have found was neither neutral nor easily corrected. | ||
*to start with, the author immediately discounts the major theory on North american settlement; the 'bering land' bridge theory. While it is true that recent scholarship has painted a more complex picture of N american settlement than this 1920's era theory. We do not need to in the words of the talk page; assume that the bering land bridge theory only works if 'million' of siberians cross into america. This is a 'straw man' theory for sure. | *to start with, the author immediately discounts the major theory on North american settlement; the 'bering land' bridge theory. While it is true that recent scholarship has painted a more complex picture of N american settlement than this 1920's era theory. We do not need to in the words of the talk page; assume that the bering land bridge theory only works if 'million' of siberians cross into america. This is a 'straw man' theory for sure.Indeed recent scholarship has proved that there are undeniable migrations through the bering land bridge. | ||
Indeed recent scholarship has proved that there are undeniable migrations through the bering land bridge. | |||
--[[User:Jolie|Jolie]] 18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Jolie|Jolie]] 18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:17, 15 October 2008
Why not the featured US History book
which is found at wikibooks here. [1].
from nearly the opening chapter of the book, what I have found was neither neutral nor easily corrected.
- to start with, the author immediately discounts the major theory on North american settlement; the 'bering land' bridge theory. While it is true that recent scholarship has painted a more complex picture of N american settlement than this 1920's era theory. We do not need to in the words of the talk page; assume that the bering land bridge theory only works if 'million' of siberians cross into america. This is a 'straw man' theory for sure.Indeed recent scholarship has proved that there are undeniable migrations through the bering land bridge.
--Jolie 18:16, 15 October 2008 (UTC)