Archive:Social impact theory: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Wikademia No edit summary |
wikademia>Wikademia No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* Heterosexual college students reported that the likelihood in engaging in risky sexual behavior was determined by the norms for sexual behavior in their groups of friends. | * Heterosexual college students reported that the likelihood in engaging in risky sexual behavior was determined by the norms for sexual behavior in their groups of friends. | ||
[[/References]] | |||
[[Category:Social psychology]] | [[Category:Social psychology]] | ||
[[Category:Sociological theories]] | [[Category:Sociological theories]] | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 11 April 2009
Social impact theory predicts that as strength and immediacy increase within a group, conformity will also increase. The more important a group is and the more one is in its presence, the more likely it is for one to conform to the group's normative pressures.
As the size of a group increases a single person has less of an effect. Thus, if one feels pressure from a group to conform, adding another person to the minority makes a much greater difference to a small group as opposed to a large group.
Bibb Latané, a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, published the theory in 1981. Latané constructed a mathematical model of the effects of strength, immediacy, and number. He applied this formula to the results of several conformity studies and it accurately predicted the actual amount of conformity that occurred within groups.
Examples
- Gay men living in communities highly involved in AIDS awareness activities report feeling more social pressure to avoid risky sexual behavior then gay men who live in less involved communities.
- Heterosexual college students reported that the likelihood in engaging in risky sexual behavior was determined by the norms for sexual behavior in their groups of friends.