Jump to content

User talk:JWSchmidt: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>Purple Scissor
wikademia>Wikademia
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
: Hello! Please excuse me for interjecting. We have some basic emoticons here, for the record. :) The relationship, well, friendly, I hope. The sole flounder of Encyc and myself have had some various interactions. There is a loose federation, perhaps. Perhaps Dr. Schmidt can give you some more valuable or useful background if needed. Please let me know if I can be of assistance as well. I will put a basic note on your talk page that I hope you will see. Pip, pip, cheerio. [[User:Eme|Eme]]
: Hello! Please excuse me for interjecting. We have some basic emoticons here, for the record. :) The relationship, well, friendly, I hope. The sole flounder of Encyc and myself have had some various interactions. There is a loose federation, perhaps. Perhaps Dr. Schmidt can give you some more valuable or useful background if needed. Please let me know if I can be of assistance as well. I will put a basic note on your talk page that I hope you will see. Pip, pip, cheerio. [[User:Eme|Eme]]
::Cool.  But why exactly did they start it?  I know there is a lot of stuff about Wikipedia scandal on one, but there is no real statement of what people are doing, or why they think it's necessary.  Publishing such a statement somewhere might be good.  BTW, you guys are giving up a lot of prominence by using nofollow links.  I harp on that one (; [[User:Purple Scissor|Purple Scissor]] 07:17, July 1, 2009 (UTC)
::Cool.  But why exactly did they start it?  I know there is a lot of stuff about Wikipedia scandal on one, but there is no real statement of what people are doing, or why they think it's necessary.  Publishing such a statement somewhere might be good.  BTW, you guys are giving up a lot of prominence by using nofollow links.  I harp on that one (; [[User:Purple Scissor|Purple Scissor]] 07:17, July 1, 2009 (UTC)
:::I'll have to take a look at that no follow stuff... and coordinate accordingly. You mean a statement here about Wikademia? [[Project:Scope]] - does that count? What would? Should? Suggestions? Thanks. :) And I'll have to consider this more later, but I must be off now... Pip Pip. [[User:Wikademia|Wikademia]]

Revision as of 07:38, 1 July 2009

Scope - there could be Scope, Meta:Scope or some variant. Wikademia 17:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

I've replied at Meta talk:Scope Academia 23:14, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Ping

hehe :-) --Erkan Yilmaz 06:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back

Welcome, today. :) Wikademia

So, what will happen here when admins at Wikipedia see their actions described at Homeopathy edit war and they come here to interfere with my research project? --JWSchmidt 20:25, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
It is my intention to support, in all the ways that I am able, the research of the individuals who contribute here. It is also my intention to maintain, in all the ways that I am able, a scholarly, civil, and respectful environment.
Please let me know how I can best support your endeavors. Wikademia

Blocking

You should be able to block users now, in case, heaven forbid, you need to. Wikademia

Hopefully nobody will notice my little research project. I'd prefer to work in peace and quiet. --JWSchmidt 06:25, June 13, 2009 (UTC)
I can remove the links to your projects from the Meta:Browse if you like... Wikademia
I'd suggest not doing anything to make this wiki less user-friendly. I just hope I can complete my study of the history of editing at Wikipedia's homeopathy page without anyone over there deciding they need to come here and disrupt this wiki. Some of the people who have edited the homeopathy article were also involved with the intelligent design issues that Moulton stuck his shoe in...some of those folks invaded Wikiversiy to shut down our research project there. I suspect that they will also freak out once they find out about this new research project. --JWSchmidt 16:51, June 13, 2009 (UTC)

Hi! (: Hmm, what is the relationship between wikademia and encyc.org, if any? There are lots of good WP articles over there. There seem to be a lot of WP users on the two wikis, and some action. I'm just wondering what is going on in general in the diaspora? Purple Scissor 04:15, July 1, 2009 (UTC)

Hello! Please excuse me for interjecting. We have some basic emoticons here, for the record. :) The relationship, well, friendly, I hope. The sole flounder of Encyc and myself have had some various interactions. There is a loose federation, perhaps. Perhaps Dr. Schmidt can give you some more valuable or useful background if needed. Please let me know if I can be of assistance as well. I will put a basic note on your talk page that I hope you will see. Pip, pip, cheerio. Eme
Cool. But why exactly did they start it? I know there is a lot of stuff about Wikipedia scandal on one, but there is no real statement of what people are doing, or why they think it's necessary. Publishing such a statement somewhere might be good. BTW, you guys are giving up a lot of prominence by using nofollow links. I harp on that one (; Purple Scissor 07:17, July 1, 2009 (UTC)
I'll have to take a look at that no follow stuff... and coordinate accordingly. You mean a statement here about Wikademia? Project:Scope - does that count? What would? Should? Suggestions? Thanks. :) And I'll have to consider this more later, but I must be off now... Pip Pip. Wikademia