Jump to content

Chemical postevolution: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
wikademia>Paxillus
No edit summary
wikademia>Silly rabbit
m Undid revision 266306068 by Paxillus (talk)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled -->
<!-- The nomination page for this article already existed when this tag was added.  If this was because the article had been nominated for deletion before, and you wish to renominate it, please replace "page=Chemical postevolution" with "page=Chemical postevolution (2nd nomination)" below before proceeding with the nomination.
-->{{AfDM|page=Chemical postevolution|logdate=2009 January 25|substed=yes }}
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=Chemical postevolution|date=25 January 2009|result='''keep'''}} -->
<!-- For administrator use only: {{oldafdfull|page=Chemical postevolution|date=25 January 2009|result='''keep'''}} -->
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->
<!-- End of AfD message, feel free to edit beyond this point -->

Revision as of 13:10, 25 January 2009


Chemical postevolution is the structural optimization of (already evolutionary optimized) natural products by synthetic chemical means. It is additional and often structurally orthogonal to natural evolution.[1] Whereas the term "Chemical Evolution" refers to an iterative optimization of any possible chemical structure, the term Chemical Postevolution especially refers to the biological improvement of antibiotic natural products by synthetic organic chemistry, primarily in antiinfective and anticancer research.

Application in drug discovery

Natural products have provided the majority of lead structures for marketed antibiotics.[2] But, only a few “pure” natural products fulfill the complex profile required for a pharmaceutical drug. A drug has to match additional physicochemical, pharmacological, toxicological and technical requirements that have not been selectors in the evolution of antibacterial secondary metabolites. On the other hand, natural products offer excellent starting points for medicinal chemistry. To create a drug, nature’s blueprints often have to be improved by semisynthesis or de novo synthesis to repair typical deficiencies such as limited stability, low solubility, narrow antibacterial spectrum, poor in vivo efficacy, etc. Chemical structure defines biological activity. Complementary to nature, a chemist can explore white spots in structural space and biological activity that have never been explored by any organism over the entire period of evolution.

Examples

Various natural antibiotics have already been optimized. Classical examples are the beta-lactam antibiotics (e.g. penicillin G to meticillin), the glycopeptides (chloroeremomycin to oritavancin) or the macrolides (erythromycin A to telithromycin). Since 2006 platensimycin.[3] has been the target for various synthetic studies aiming at a chemical postevolution of this potent FabF inhibitor. Various other classes of natural antibiotics are now in the focus of chemical postevolution.[4]

References

  1. ↑ F. von Nussbaum, M. Brands, B. Hinzen, S. Weigand, D. Häbich, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 5194–5254; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5072–5129. Antibacterial Natural Products in Medicinal Chemistry—Exodus or Revival? PMID 16881035
  2. ↑ C. Walsh, Antibiotics, actions, origins, resistance, 1. Aufl., ASM, Washington, DC, 2003
  3. ↑ Jun Wang et al, Platensimycin is a selective FabF inhibitor with potent antibiotic properties, Nature 441, 358-361 (18 May 2006) PMID 16710421
  4. ↑ K. C. Nicolaou, Jason S. Chen, David J. Edmonds, Anthony A. Estrada, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 670–732; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 660-719. Recent Advances in the Chemistry and Biology of Naturally Occurring Antibiotics PMID 19130444