Jump to content

Mass cremations in India: Difference between revisions

From IdeaWazaWiki
Newer edit →

wikademia>SmackBot

wikademia>Franchesca786
Created new page, including citations and outside resources
 
wikademia>SmackBot
m Date maintenance tags and general fixes
Line 3: Line 3:
Khalra's documentary evidence consisted of entries in firewood purchase registers from three crematoria in [[Amritsar]] district of Punjab. Police officials deposited bodies and purchased a specified 300 kilograms of wood required to burn a single body. The registries identify the names of the officers depositing the bodies and, in some cases, even identifies the bodies.
Khalra's documentary evidence consisted of entries in firewood purchase registers from three crematoria in [[Amritsar]] district of Punjab. Police officials deposited bodies and purchased a specified 300 kilograms of wood required to burn a single body. The registries identify the names of the officers depositing the bodies and, in some cases, even identifies the bodies.


After a writ petition filed in the [[Punjab and Haryana High Court]] impelling it to investigate such mass illegal cremations was rejected, Jaswant Singh Khalra and Jaspal Singh Dhillon brought the case to the Supreme Court. In April of 1995, the Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab (CIIP)filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court to demand a comprehensive inquiry into the mass cremations. Shortly thereafter, Khalra was abducted and killed. The Central Bureau of Investigations was ordered by the Supreme Court to investigate the crimes<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/dec96.php|title=Supreme Court of India Record of Proceedings, Writ Petition (Crl.) No 497/95 Paramjit Kaur, Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & ORS, Respondant(s)|date=12/12/1996|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>.   
After a writ petition filed in the [[Punjab and Haryana High Court]] impelling it to investigate such mass illegal cremations was rejected, Jaswant Singh Khalra and Jaspal Singh Dhillon brought the case to the Supreme Court. In April 1995, the Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab (CIIP)filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court to demand a comprehensive inquiry into the mass cremations. Shortly thereafter, Khalra was abducted and killed. The Central Bureau of Investigations was ordered by the Supreme Court to investigate the crimes<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/dec96.php|title=Supreme Court of India Record of Proceedings, Writ Petition (Crl.) No 497/95 Paramjit Kaur, Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & ORS, Respondant(s)|date=12/12/1996|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>.   


When the CBI's report disclosed 2097 illegal cremations in Amritsar district, the Supreme Court referred the matter of secret cremations in Punjab, along with the more general matter of police abductions and disappearances, to India's [[National Human Rights Commission]] (NHRC)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/dec96.php|title=Supreme Court of India Record of Proceedings, Writ Petition (Crl.) No 497/95 Paramjit Kaur, Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & ORS, Respondant(s)|date=12/12/1996|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>. However, for the next several years the CIIP, NHRC, and the [[Government of India]] engaged in a legal battle over the proper jurisdiction and duties of the Commission <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/nhrc.php|title=National Human Rights Commission: Punjab Mass Cremations Case|publisher=Ensaaf|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>.  
When the CBI's report disclosed 2097 illegal cremations in Amritsar district, the Supreme Court referred the matter of secret cremations in Punjab, along with the more general matter of police abductions and disappearances, to India's [[National Human Rights Commission]] (NHRC)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/dec96.php|title=Supreme Court of India Record of Proceedings, Writ Petition (Crl.) No 497/95 Paramjit Kaur, Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & ORS, Respondant(s)|date=12/12/1996|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>. However, for the next several years the CIIP, NHRC, and the [[Government of India]] engaged in a legal battle over the proper jurisdiction and duties of the Commission <ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/nhrc.php|title=National Human Rights Commission: Punjab Mass Cremations Case|publisher=Ensaaf|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>.  
Line 11: Line 11:
Many of the claims filed have been ignored by the Commission, many people alleged to be illegally cremated have been left unidentified, and the Commission has limited itself only to the investigation of the legality of the cremations, ignoring the question of whether the police had wrongfully killed those cremated. Despite efforts by human rights groups such as the CIIP, [[Human Rights Watch]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hrw.org/pub/amicusbriefs/punjab.pdf|title=Brief to Indian National Human Rights Commission|date=11/14/2003|publisher=Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law Student Advocates for Human Rights|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>, the [[Physicians for Human Rights]], and Bellevue/NYU School of Medicine Program for Survivors of Torture<ref>{{cite book|title=Evaluation of Litigants Pertaining to Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 447/95 Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab vs. State of Punjab|publisher=Physicians for Human Rights and the Bellevue/NYU School of Medicine Program for Survivors of Torture|date=10/24/2005|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/pdf/reports/PHR-Bellevue.pdf}}</ref>, the NHRC has effectively closed the case, and has not investigated any cremations cases or recorded the testimony of victims' families.
Many of the claims filed have been ignored by the Commission, many people alleged to be illegally cremated have been left unidentified, and the Commission has limited itself only to the investigation of the legality of the cremations, ignoring the question of whether the police had wrongfully killed those cremated. Despite efforts by human rights groups such as the CIIP, [[Human Rights Watch]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.hrw.org/pub/amicusbriefs/punjab.pdf|title=Brief to Indian National Human Rights Commission|date=11/14/2003|publisher=Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law Student Advocates for Human Rights|accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref>, the [[Physicians for Human Rights]], and Bellevue/NYU School of Medicine Program for Survivors of Torture<ref>{{cite book|title=Evaluation of Litigants Pertaining to Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 447/95 Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab vs. State of Punjab|publisher=Physicians for Human Rights and the Bellevue/NYU School of Medicine Program for Survivors of Torture|date=10/24/2005|url=http://www.ensaaf.org/pdf/reports/PHR-Bellevue.pdf}}</ref>, the NHRC has effectively closed the case, and has not investigated any cremations cases or recorded the testimony of victims' families.


==See Also==
==See also==
*[[Human rights in India]]
*[[Human rights in India]]
*[[Punjab human rights]]
*[[Punjab human rights]]
Line 20: Line 20:
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}


==External Links==
==External links==
*[http://ensaaf.org/ Official website of Ensaaf, a human rights documentation organization focused specifically on Punjab, India]
*[http://ensaaf.org/ Official website of Ensaaf, a human rights documentation organization focused specifically on Punjab, India]
*[http://www.hrw.org/en/asia/india/ The official Human Rights Watch page for India]
*[http://www.hrw.org/en/asia/india/ The official Human Rights Watch page for India]
Line 27: Line 27:
*[http://www.survivorsoftorture.org/ Official website for the Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture]
*[http://www.survivorsoftorture.org/ Official website for the Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture]


[[Category: Human rights in India]]
[[Category:Human rights in India]]

Revision as of 14:08, 28 April 2009

Punjabi government records suggest that from 1984 until 1994 mass cremations were used by state security forces in Punjab to dispose of thousands of people "disappeared" for their alleged involvement in the Sikh militancy movement. In early 1995, human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra used municipal records to expose over 6,000 secret cremations in one Punjab district alone[1]. Later, a Central Bureau of Investigation report admitted to 2,097 of these cases as "illegal cremations"[2].

Khalra's documentary evidence consisted of entries in firewood purchase registers from three crematoria in Amritsar district of Punjab. Police officials deposited bodies and purchased a specified 300 kilograms of wood required to burn a single body. The registries identify the names of the officers depositing the bodies and, in some cases, even identifies the bodies.

After a writ petition filed in the Punjab and Haryana High Court impelling it to investigate such mass illegal cremations was rejected, Jaswant Singh Khalra and Jaspal Singh Dhillon brought the case to the Supreme Court. In April 1995, the Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab (CIIP)filed a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court to demand a comprehensive inquiry into the mass cremations. Shortly thereafter, Khalra was abducted and killed. The Central Bureau of Investigations was ordered by the Supreme Court to investigate the crimes[3].

When the CBI's report disclosed 2097 illegal cremations in Amritsar district, the Supreme Court referred the matter of secret cremations in Punjab, along with the more general matter of police abductions and disappearances, to India's National Human Rights Commission (NHRC)[4]. However, for the next several years the CIIP, NHRC, and the Government of India engaged in a legal battle over the proper jurisdiction and duties of the Commission [5].

In early 1999, the NHRC itself placed both a territorial restriction on its investigation (it limited it to three crematoria in Amritsar district), and it limited itself to the study of the cremations[6]. Though victims' families and human rights organizations have claimed that the Commission has flouted the rights to life and redress, enshrined in the Constitution of India and international law, there has been no admission of liability or inquiry into the facts, and victims' families were allowed to file claims only for a limited time. The police have admitted custody of a small percentage of victims, but have maintained that the detainees were killed in cross-fire after militants attacked police convoys searching for hidden weapons[7].

Many of the claims filed have been ignored by the Commission, many people alleged to be illegally cremated have been left unidentified, and the Commission has limited itself only to the investigation of the legality of the cremations, ignoring the question of whether the police had wrongfully killed those cremated. Despite efforts by human rights groups such as the CIIP, Human Rights Watch[8], the Physicians for Human Rights, and Bellevue/NYU School of Medicine Program for Survivors of Torture[9], the NHRC has effectively closed the case, and has not investigated any cremations cases or recorded the testimony of victims' families.

See also

References

  1. ↑ The Punjab Mass Cremations Case: India Burning the Rule of Law. Ensaaf. 01/2007. http://www.ensaaf.org/pdf/reports/cremations.pdf. 
  2. ↑ "Public notice issued by the National Human Rights Commission". The Tribune. 07/15/2004. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040730/nhrc1.htm. Retrieved on 2009-04-27. 
  3. ↑ "Supreme Court of India Record of Proceedings, Writ Petition (Crl.) No 497/95 Paramjit Kaur, Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & ORS, Respondant(s)". 12/12/1996. http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/dec96.php. Retrieved on 2009-04-27. 
  4. ↑ "Supreme Court of India Record of Proceedings, Writ Petition (Crl.) No 497/95 Paramjit Kaur, Petitioner(s) v. State of Punjab & ORS, Respondant(s)". 12/12/1996. http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/dec96.php. Retrieved on 2009-04-27. 
  5. ↑ "National Human Rights Commission: Punjab Mass Cremations Case". Ensaaf. http://www.ensaaf.org/docs/nhrc.php. Retrieved on 2009-04-27. 
  6. ↑ India: Break the Cycle of Impunity and Torture in Punjab. Amnesty International. 01/2003. http://web.amnesty.org/aidoc/aidoc_pdf.nsf/Index/ASA200022003ENGLISH/$File/ASA2000203.pdf. 
  7. ↑ Order of the National Human Rights Commission, Reference Case No. 1/97/NHRC. New Delhi. 10/09/2006. http://nhrc.nic.in/Punjab.htm#Reference%20made%20by%20the%20Supreme%20Court. 
  8. ↑ "Brief to Indian National Human Rights Commission". Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law Student Advocates for Human Rights. 11/14/2003. http://www.hrw.org/pub/amicusbriefs/punjab.pdf. Retrieved on 2009-04-27. 
  9. ↑ Evaluation of Litigants Pertaining to Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 447/95 Committee for Information and Initiative on Punjab vs. State of Punjab. Physicians for Human Rights and the Bellevue/NYU School of Medicine Program for Survivors of Torture. 10/24/2005. http://www.ensaaf.org/pdf/reports/PHR-Bellevue.pdf. 
Retrieved from "https://ideawaza.com/index.php?title=Mass_cremations_in_India&oldid=64015"