Open design cars: Difference between revisions
wikademia>Erkan Yilmaz :intended was: can be open, but must not be. --~~~~ |
wikademia>Dr. Eme No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
why is there no need to be open? [[User:Dr. Eme|Dr. Eme]] | why is there no need to be open? [[User:Dr. Eme|Dr. Eme]] | ||
:intended was: can be open, but must not be. --[[User:Erkan Yilmaz|Erkan Yilmaz]] 06:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC) | :intended was: can be open, but must not be. --[[User:Erkan Yilmaz|Erkan Yilmaz]] 06:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Working specifications== | |||
* 4 wheels | |||
* 4 seats | |||
* Locks | |||
* A trunk | |||
* An engine | |||
* A frame | |||
* Paint | |||
* Windows | |||
* Muffler | |||
===Others=== | |||
* Good control | |||
* Safe | |||
* Good braking | |||
* Can go reasonable fast | |||
* Aesthetically pleasing | |||
* | |||
==See also== | |||
* [[Automotive engineering]] | |||
[[Category:Design]] | [[Category:Design]] | ||
[[Category:Open design]] | [[Category:Open design]] | ||
[[Category:Automotive engineering]] | [[Category:Automotive engineering]] | ||
Revision as of 05:04, 27 October 2009
They've got to look cool. They got to be fast. They got to be efficient.
No labels unless people want brand labels.
Flex fuel capable. Perhaps some battery models....
no need to be open :-)
why is there no need to be open? Dr. Eme
- intended was: can be open, but must not be. --Erkan Yilmaz 06:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
Working specifications
- 4 wheels
- 4 seats
- Locks
- A trunk
- An engine
- A frame
- Paint
- Windows
- Muffler
Others
- Good control
- Safe
- Good braking
- Can go reasonable fast
- Aesthetically pleasing