Somebody else's problem: Difference between revisions

m Reverting possible vandalism by 2603:8000:BB02:30E2:C8C4:228D:2783:5D1A to version by Monkbot. Report False Positive? Thanks, ClueBot NG. (3915319) (Bot)
→References by others: A use of the phrase "somebody else's problem" which neither predates Adams use of the term nor is an especially notable reference to it isn't notable enough to go here.
Line 31: Line 31:
|access-date = 2015-03-24
|access-date = 2015-03-24
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
* Christopher Negus, writing on the origin of [[Unix]] at [[Bell Labs]] in the 1970s, described Bell Labs at the time as "a think tank where ideas came first and profits were somebody else's problem".<ref name=rhel4bib-2006>{{Cite book
<!-- more cite info at https://www.amazon.com/Fedora-Red-Enterprise-Linux-Bible/dp/0471754919 -->
|last = Negus
|first = Christopher
|title = Fedora 5 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Bible
|chapter =  Linux's roots in Unix (part 1, chapter 1, section 3)
|publisher = Wiley
|location = New York
|via = [[TechTarget]]
|series = Bible (Book 327)
|date = 2006-05-10
|page = 6
|isbn = 978-0-4717-5491-6 <!--|isbn-10 = 0-471-75491-9 -->
|oclc = 69746564
|chapter-url = http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/feature/Linuxs-roots-in-Unix
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20131213203844/http://searchitchannel.techtarget.com/feature/Linuxs-roots-in-Unix
|archive-date = 2013-12-13
|url-status = live
|access-date = 2015-03-25
}}</ref>{{Original research inline|date=November 2018}}
* Adams' description of an SEP field is quoted in an article of "psychological invisibility", where it is compared to other fictional effects such as the [[perception filter]] in ''[[Doctor Who]]'', as well as cognitive biases such as [[inattentional blindness]] and [[change blindness]].<ref>[http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/13/sight-unseen-critic-at-large-kathryn-schulz Sight unseen], Catherine Schulz, [[The New Yorker]], April 13, 2015</ref>
* Adams' description of an SEP field is quoted in an article of "psychological invisibility", where it is compared to other fictional effects such as the [[perception filter]] in ''[[Doctor Who]]'', as well as cognitive biases such as [[inattentional blindness]] and [[change blindness]].<ref>[http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/04/13/sight-unseen-critic-at-large-kathryn-schulz Sight unseen], Catherine Schulz, [[The New Yorker]], April 13, 2015</ref>